denstorebog Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Oh shit. Can someone tell me the current time in ET? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manhole Eunuchsbane Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 8 minutes ago, denstorebog said: Oh shit. Can someone tell me the current time in ET? 8:09 pm right now ET. Good stuff. Looking forward to it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
all swedes are racist Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Trump tax returns. not necessarily DJT's. Willing to bet dollars to donuts this will be way less of a big deal than people are expecting. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SkynJay Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 I can't help but feel this will be Al Capone''s vault. We may have our hopes too high here. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
butterbumps! Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 I have a terrible, sinking suspicion these aren't going to be Donald Trump's returns, but another "Trump's" (one of his mouth-breather kids, a Trump organization return, etc etc). Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denstorebog Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 I dunno. That "(Seriously)" seems to imply "yes, it's what you think it is". I agree there's room for interpretation, but it would be a serious breach of trust and damaging to the show's brand if it wasn't what people expected. Would they really do that to their viewers? (On the other hand, it's not on the show's FB page, which is kinda odd. You'd think they'd go all-out.) This user comment pretty much nailed it: "this is either a big let down or the biggest scoop in modern political history" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
all swedes are racist Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 either way, unless they show him writing personal checks out to al nusra or some shit, doubt it will make any tangible difference. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DunderMifflin Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 David Cay Johnston is apparently the journalist that "has the tax returns" but his tweet was far less sensational. Something like - I have a big story about Trump and his taxes. His tweet: On @maddow I'll break a big story about Trump and his taxes - 9PM eastern via @DCReportMedia Ill be on @lawrence, too. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr. Pepper Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 13 minutes ago, butterbumps! said: I have a terrible, sinking suspicion these aren't going to be Donald Trump's returns, but another "Trump's" (one of his mouth-breather kids, a Trump organization return, etc etc). Same. Maddow has been doing some excellent work lately. One of her things is she's no longer covering Trump's tweets as news. She will lose a lot of credibility if she hypes this as something we all hope it will be only to have it turn out to be one of the kids. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denstorebog Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 "What we've got is from 2005... the President's 1040 form... details to come tonight 9PM ET, MSNBC." So not exactly recent stuff, but should be interesting if there's dirt in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Arryn Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 ...the Selected Works? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DunderMifflin Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Is that even legal to publish someones tax returns? I think states are ok but I was under the impression federal is a no no. Maybe it's ok if you just say you have them. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denstorebog Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 2 minutes ago, DunderMifflin said: Is that even legal to publish someones tax returns? I think states are ok but I was under the impression federal is a no no. Maybe it's ok if you just say you have them. In any case, if there's anything good in there, we're about to see a whole new level of Trump vs. the media. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalbear Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 I think it's amusing that this is also the same time he had the pussy grabbing tape, and I for one am waiting to see how he declares his grabbing of pussy. Is it a gift? Did he itemize it? Was it a depreciation? Possibly a dividend? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalbear Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Just now, denstorebog said: In any case, if there's anything good in there, we're about to see a whole new level of Trump vs. the media. It is perfectly legal to comment on found material even if it was obtained illegally, provided that you weren't the one that obtained it illegally. Sources can provide you information. Though with the Gawker ruling, this is somewhat in doubt, it's almost certain that this can be considered a public interest that outweighs the privacy rights of Trump. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
all swedes are racist Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 lol "$38M in taxes on $150M income" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mudguard Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 It would be really big news if there's income coming from Russia. If there isn't a Russia connection, I don't think there'll be anything game changing in there. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denstorebog Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 2 minutes ago, Kalbear said: It is perfectly legal to comment on found material even if it was obtained illegally, provided that you weren't the one that obtained it illegally. Sources can provide you information. Though with the Gawker ruling, this is somewhat in doubt, it's almost certain that this can be considered a public interest that outweighs the privacy rights of Trump. That has very little to do with whether Trump is going to go off on the media again. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalbear Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 Just now, denstorebog said: That has very little to do with whether Trump is going to go off on the media again. He already has. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DunderMifflin Posted March 15, 2017 Share Posted March 15, 2017 5 minutes ago, Mudguard said: It would be really big news if there's income coming from Russia. If there isn't a Russia connection, I don't think there'll be anything game changing in there. It'll be big enough if there are any business ties with a 3rd generation Russian immigrant. People have been so salivating over a Russian connection that anything will do the trick. I wouldnt be surprised if him selling bearskin rugs was a big story Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.