Darth Richard II Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Ha, I feel like I would be cheating if I entered that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madness Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 You're more than welcome, DR. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalbear Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 You could post the ending. That'd be funny. Or you could post the wrong ending and make everyone freak out, and only those who had read it could say otherwise. Now that would be super funny. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Richard II Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 Ha no, I'm not that much of a jackass. Yet. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hello World Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 @Madness are you going to make a secret forum on TSA to discuss the book or not? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Seswatha Jordan Posted May 25, 2017 Share Posted May 25, 2017 13 minutes ago, Hello World said: @Madness are you going to make a secret forum on TSA to discuss the book or not? I'm not madness, but the answer is no. He said it took traffic to the forum to a all-time low when the book was released and there was already pages and pages of threads. And, it don't seem as if that many ARC's are hitting eBay this year. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hello World Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 I guess when we get arcs we can use this one. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Michael Seswatha Jordan Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 10 minutes ago, Hello World said: I guess when we get arcs we can use this one. No. Wert said if the boOKs were discussed before release he would close the thread and there would be reprisals. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalbear Posted May 26, 2017 Share Posted May 26, 2017 There are all of two correct predictions now, though one is correct only on a technicality. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
akh Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 May I ask here whether I'll see my main man Iyokus in TUC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Werthead Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 10 minutes ago, akh said: May I ask here whether I'll see my main man Iyokus in TUC? No. But his presence is felt. He also gets a very, very intriguing mention in the glossary. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hello World Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 Ugh... super disappointing. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuckyCharms Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 Do we finally learn who Anasurimbor Ganrelka II was? Like, specifically how he fits into the Anasurimbor Dynasty tree. Older brother of Nau-Cayuti or a younger brother of Celmomas. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Werthead Posted May 27, 2017 Share Posted May 27, 2017 11 minutes ago, LuckyCharms said: Do we finally learn who Anasurimbor Ganrelka II was? Like, specifically how he fits into the Anasurimbor Dynasty tree. Older brother of Nau-Cayuti or a younger brother of Celmomas. No. Nau-Cayuti is confirmed as Celmomas's youngest song but the relationship with Ganrelka is not specified. He is called "successor" to Celmomas and last reigning King of Kuniuri. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapushiSun Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 Does the TUC shed more light on the White-Luck Warrior and his fate? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kalbear Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 1 hour ago, PapushiSun said: Does the TUC shed more light on the White-Luck Warrior and his fate? Yes, it answers what happened at the end of TGO (though there are a couple different interpretations) and explains largely why WLW ends up failing despite being able to see the entire causal chain. It also explains to a certain extent what the WLW is in a bit more detail. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kuenjato Posted May 28, 2017 Author Share Posted May 28, 2017 Question: there is this section in TGO (Chapter 4, pg 110) where Kellhus has a conversation with "himself" about burning the ground. Is this elaborated on in TUC? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Werthead Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 1 hour ago, kuenjato said: Question: there is this section in TGO (Chapter 4, pg 110) where Kellhus has a conversation with "himself" about burning the ground. Is this elaborated on in TUC? Yes. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LuckyCharms Posted May 28, 2017 Share Posted May 28, 2017 Do Eskeles or Zsoronga do anything of significance, or interact with other POV characters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
PapushiSun Posted May 29, 2017 Share Posted May 29, 2017 11 hours ago, Kalbear said: Yes, it answers what happened at the end of TGO (though there are a couple different interpretations) and explains largely why WLW ends up failing despite being able to see the entire causal chain. It also explains to a certain extent what the WLW is in a bit more detail. Is it a satisfactory explanation? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.