Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0
HouseFrancis93

Would Walder Frey have betrayed Robb if he didn't forget his vow?

5 posts in this topic

Just a quick curiosity i found while re-reading the red wedding. Was Lord Walder Frey's betrayal of Robb actually in reaction to the slight Robb gave him? (we do know Lord Frey is angry, arrogant, petty, and spiteful) or was that just pretense (though we know he cares nothing for reputation in that sense, only in the sense he's considered a great man). So what do you guys  n gals think? Was Robbs marriage to another really why Lord Frey betrayed him in the most profoundly disgusting way, or was it just Lord Frey seizing opportunity? After all it does seem if the Freys made amends they could have beaten the Lannisters 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I would say the Red Wedding was more about self preservation for the Freys than pure revenge or opportunism. 

The Freys took a huge risk by declaring for Robb and beyond the loss of their anticipated royal status, they were left extremely vulnerable if Robb's campaign failed. Recall that Walder was infamous for his flexible allegiances, but was convinced to make a very clear and public declaration. And judging by the amount of concessions he extracted in negotiating with Cat, Walder considered his ambiguous allegiance a valuable position.

In one masterflub, Robb not only voided all the agreements he'd made with Walder, but demonstrated his unworthiness of kingship and his complete political daftness. Even in the best case of Lannister defeat, Walder no longer had a reason to believe that Robb would be a better king. How could Walder let his people act as the first defense between a hostile southern kingdom and it's newly independent northern half if King Robb were unwilling to fulfill his lordly obligations?

Although the Red Wedding is considered in-universe an atrocity by most people, it was an extremely rational move on the part of the Freys. They were left out in the cold. They couldn't trust Robb and faced Lannister wrath if they didn't make some very big overtures to Tywin. 

 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

cgrav that is a very good point. it is curious to me. I just feel an kind of ominous, yet predictable, makes sense, but at the same time? I know Lord Frey cares nothing of honor or tradition, but i also recall the fact that i mean robb brought 3500 men, I know he had the boltons, but if the rest of the north rose up around robb's death as a rally call (wink wink what's coming?) Frey would be fk'd he had to know tywin only wants him to kill robb, and he gets a fancy pardon and a final thats all ya get good luck getting any lions for soldiers

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Robb was about to take both his men and their men up to the North for the purpose of dislodging ~600 Ironborn from three miserable little castles, and leave the Riverlands borderline defenseless and easy pickings for Mace's army. I'm not sure why they wouldn't turn on him at that point. I don't think the marriage pact had much to do with it- they were promised a Lord Paramount marriage (Robb hadn't been declared king by his bannermen at that point), and they got one to a man who's very likely richer than Robb and commands a region just as populous and powerful as Robb's own.

Edited by Nihlus

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Yup - cgrav and Nihlus have the right of it.

Walder was saving his House from the fate of of House Reyne.

In a few generations bards will be singing about the "Noble Lord Frey" who "cast away his honour" to "save his House".  The song will be called a "A Lord's gotta do what a Lord's gotta do".

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this  
Followers 0