Angel Eyes

Why did Viserys son of Daemon, later Viserys II, have his son Aegon marry Naerys, instead of Aemon?

6 posts in this topic

Aegon generally mistreated her, which included raping her, which led to several miscarriages, stillbirths and her death, plus sullied her name as much as he could after she died, and legitimized all his bastards just to spite her and their son Daeron, which led to decades of unrest in the form of the Blackfyre Rebellion.

It doesn’t seem that the eldest son has to marry a daughter; Baelon Targaryen, second son of Jaehaerys I, married his sister Alyssa. Aemon at least cared about her, if not siring Daeron. He would have treated her well, and not raped her, for starters. 

But nooo, it has to be the eldest son.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Viserys married Aegon and Naerys when they were 18 and 15 respectively. At this point, he had no way of knowing how low Aegon IV would fall. At his youth he was described as promising, vigorous and handsome, and only had had a single mistress before marriage (Falena Stokeworth). Not giving him Naerys would have been been a huge slight to him.

The main reason was probably pride. It wasn't likely that his son inherited the throne, but at least he wanted to build a powerful junior Targaryen line. Marrying your eldest son to some minor house (such as the Stokeworths) detracted from that goal. Marrying his eldest son with her daughter consolidated it.

It should also be taken into account that Viserys probably felt guilty about Aegon. It is said that the boy was very close to his mother, and it was a huge blow to him when Lady Logarre left for Lys. Viserys probably had neglected Aegon too, prioritizing his duties as Hand of the King. And he had also forced him to end his two-years relationship with Falena. I can see Viserys seeing himself as responsible for Aegon being a scarred unhappy man.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

I think the more interesting question is why Naerys wasn't married to Daeron I - and the answer to that is likely that the Aegon-Naerys marriage was determined back in the day when Viserys II was still the fourth son of Aegon III.

The age gap helps a little bit with that, but it would have worked better if Naerys had been Viserys' eldest child or at least the middle sibling.

At the time of their marriage Aegon III's children were still very young, and Aegon had only two sons. House Targaryen needed more heirs - one calamity, plague, etc. and the king might be without heirs.

And traditionally it is the duty of the eldest son to continue the line. Aemon was likely already inclined to join the Kingsguard at that point.

2 hours ago, The hairy bear said:

It should also be taken into account that Viserys probably felt guilty about Aegon. It is said that the boy was very close to his mother, and it was a huge blow to him when Lady Logarre left for Lys.

How do we know this? What I know is that Viserys himself was stricken when his wife left him, not his children. Although it may have impacted them, too, even more so when Larra finally died in 145 AC (prior to that they might have visited her occasionally).

2 hours ago, The hairy bear said:

Viserys probably had neglected Aegon too, prioritizing his duties as Hand of the King. And he had also forced him to end his two-years relationship with Falena. I can see Viserys seeing himself as responsible for Aegon being a scarred unhappy man.

I'm pretty sure he shares part of the blame, but I doubt the man he became ever admitted that to Aegon. He would have seen him as a wastrel and a failure. If Aegon truly poisoned his father I'd really like the possibility that Aegon did that because he realized his father had plans to cut him out of the succession and groom and name Daeron his heir - which would have been a very wise choice. Daeron was already a man grown when Baelor the Blessed died, and likely showed all the promised his father was severely lacking. If Viserys II had ruled 10-20 years or so, Daeron II would have been the ideal successor, not the aging Aegon.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Good question. I suppose a more suitable wife for Aegon IV would be Daena, if you take away the age difference?

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
On 1/10/2018 at 9:09 AM, Lord Varys said:

I think the more interesting question is why Naerys wasn't married to Daeron I - and the answer to that is likely that the Aegon-Naerys marriage was determined back in the day when Viserys II was still the fourth son of Aegon III.

The age gap helps a little bit with that, but it would have worked better if Naerys had been Viserys' eldest child or at least the middle sibling.

At the time of their marriage Aegon III's children were still very young, and Aegon had only two sons. House Targaryen needed more heirs - one calamity, plague, etc. and the king might be without heirs.

And traditionally it is the duty of the eldest son to continue the line. Aemon was likely already inclined to join the Kingsguard at that point.

How do we know this? What I know is that Viserys himself was stricken when his wife left him, not his children. Although it may have impacted them, too, even more so when Larra finally died in 145 AC (prior to that they might have visited her occasionally).

I'm pretty sure he shares part of the blame, but I doubt the man he became ever admitted that to Aegon. He would have seen him as a wastrel and a failure. If Aegon truly poisoned his father I'd really like the possibility that Aegon did that because he realized his father had plans to cut him out of the succession and groom and name Daeron his heir - which would have been a very wise choice. Daeron was already a man grown when Baelor the Blessed died, and likely showed all the promised his father was severely lacking. If Viserys II had ruled 10-20 years or so, Daeron II would have been the ideal successor, not the aging Aegon.

You mean fifth son. 

If Viserys saw Aegon as a wastrel and failure and loved his daughter, why give him a wife that Aegon would abuse and drive into her grave? 

As I said in the opening post, it isn't necessarily the eldest son who commits incest. Otherwise, Alyssa, who bore Viserys and Daemon, wouldn't have married Baelon; she would have married the eldest son, Aemon.

Edited by Angel Eyes

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Angel Eyes said:

You mean fifth son. 

No, I mean fourth son. If I remember the old appendix from AGoT correctly, then Viserys II was originally conceived as being the fourth son of Aegon III. He would have had at least four sons, Daeron I, Baelor the Blessed, an unknown third son who likely predeceased Baelor, and Viserys II. That changed when the age of Baelor Breakspear and his brothers, sons, and nephews as given in THK really made it impossible for Viserys II, Aegon IV, and Daeron II to be descendants of Aegon III. And even with the change from Viserys II from a son to a younger brother of Aegon III he still has to have his children at a very early age to make things work.

9 hours ago, Angel Eyes said:

If Viserys saw Aegon as a wastrel and failure and loved his daughter, why give him a wife that Aegon would abuse and drive into her grave? 

In 153 AC Viserys wouldn't have given up hope that Aegon might come around. But the reason why he and Naerys may have less to do with Viserys own obsession to found his own Targaryen cadet branch but simply be a precaution to produce more potential heirs for the Iron Throne. And again, since Aemon might already have voiced his intention/desire to join the Kingsguard at that point, he simply fell out as a potential husband for Naerys. Aemon wouldn't have been close to Naerys in the Kingsguard while Aegon III and his sons sat the Iron Throne, considering that it was hardly a given that those kings would extend KG protection to their nephew/niece and cousins.

And if Aegon and Naerys had ended up settling in a castle of their own then Aemon might have only seen them very infrequently, in any case.

9 hours ago, Angel Eyes said:

As I said in the opening post, it isn't necessarily the eldest son who commits incest. Otherwise, Alyssa, who bore Viserys and Daemon, wouldn't have married Baelon; she would have married the eldest son, Aemon.

The marriage policy of Jaehaerys I seems to be somewhat odd. It is strange that Prince Aemon was married to his half-aunt Jocelyn, the half-sister of Jaehaerys I and Alysanne instead of his full sister Alyssa who ended up marrying her younger brother Baelon.

It is somewhat understandable that Alyssa Velaryon's daughter by Lord Baratheon ended up marrying into the royal family, but it is still odd that she got the Heir Apparent and not the spare Baelon. One could attribute this to the power and influence Alyssa Velaryon and her husband may have had in the early years of Jaehaerys I's reign (the fact that the king's first daughter was named after her grandmother is testament to that influence, too) but I'm not sure if this is enough. Jaehaerys I also married his sister Alysanne, and we seem to get a hint in TSotD as to why Jaehaerys I didn't marry his elder sister Rhaena, too. He surely could have mimicked the Conqueror and Maegor in taking more than one wife. His love for Alysanne apparently explains why he married her, despite the Targaryen tradition that a son marry his eldest sister (that's why Aegon I married both Visenya and Rhaenys) while Rhaena's apparent love for Androw, the second son of Lord Farman, might provide the explanation as to why she did not end up marrying Jaehaerys I. She may have returned to Fair Isle after Maegor's downfall, finally marrying her true love. And if that's true - who knows? Perhaps Androw and Rhaena's descendants eventually inherited Faircastle and Fair Isle? Perhaps even Androw ended up as the Lord of Fair Isle because his elder brother died early and childless? We don't know yet. 

Now, one way to explain this is the simple fact that Aemon wasn't the oldest son of Jaehaerys I and Alysanne. That was Prince Aegon, the eldest child they had, even older than Princess Alyssa. We do know that the five children who died did not live to adulthood. They did not necessarily die in infancy or as toddlers. Prince Aegon may have lived long enough to be betrothed to his sister Alyssa only dying at a time when Aemon was already betrothed to Jocelyn Baratheon - say in his early teens or so. Then it would have made sense that Jaehaerys I and Alysanne could no longer call off the Aemon-Jocelyn marriage in favor of Aemon marrying Alyssa, resulting in them eventually marrying Alyssa to young Baelon.

Going with the traditional sibling marriage for a branch of the family that is imagined to become a cadet branch doesn't make a lot of sense. Baelon and Alyssa's children would be full-blooded Targaryens, inheriting blood claims both from their father and their mother - who happened to be Jaehaerys I's eldest surviving child - whereas Aemon's child(ren) would only inherit a blood claim through their father. Jocelyn Baratheon was also closely related to and connected with the royal family through her mother Alyssa Velaryon, but the Baratheons and Velaryons do not exactly have a strong blood claim of their own.

In that sense, the marriage policy is pretty odd here.

It is difficult to compare it to the situation after the Dance considering that Jaehaerys I and Alysanne really had nine children. They had more than enough heirs. Aegon III and Viserys did not - and might have been haunted by the Dance which nearly led to the extinction of their entire family.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!


Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.


Sign In Now