Jump to content

Did the Tyrells violate guest right?


Varysblackfyre321

Recommended Posts

Not that I recall. 

Maybe guest rights don't apply if you have to pay for the hospitality - in an inn for example. Or if you bring your own food to the table - like Lord Manderly or the Tyrells (who paid for the food served at the Purple Wedding). 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, The Transporter said:

Violations of Guest Rights

  1. Jaime pushing Bran out of the window.
  2. Red wedding.
  3. The Tyrells and Baelish when they killed Joffrey.
  4. Mance Rayder and his women when they killed Roose Bolton's serving men and Big Walder Frey.
  5. Craster's Keep.

It is Little Walder and his killer is either Big Walder or Ramsay.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

great topic VBF321 - thanks, i never thought about this before!

ok, violation of guest right specifics - i like it ...

if we are considering a murder within a family / family person kills a family member, i would contend that this isn't guest violation, it's kinslaying and is probably higer on the level of evil.

[regarding the purple wedding and olena, it could very well be that she didn't eat lannister food, she could have stayed in her own tent or wheelhouse.  she didn't need anything from the lannisters so she didn't have ask for guest right, and since the bedding didn't happen at the wedding, she wasn't kinfolk with the lannister family by law.  worked out great]

regarding jaime though - a question for more information:  was he a guest at winterfell or was he acting as a knight of the kingsguard?  would a knight of the kingsguard get some sort of custom violation exemption consideration?

i would agree with folks who state (in this, my summarization):
- when people come and take over/war with you, there isn't any "invitation" so that doesn't count as a guest/host violation, its like today's insurance clause of 'act of war'.

- if you are in an economic agreement of sorts with someone and then that someone murders you, that would be "murder" and not a guest/host violation.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Yaya said:

[regarding the purple wedding and olena, it could very well be that she didn't eat lannister food, she could have stayed in her own tent or wheelhouse.  she didn't need anything from the lannisters so she didn't have ask for guest right, and since the bedding didn't happen at the wedding, she wasn't kinfolk with the lannister family by law.  worked out great]

regarding jaime though - a question for more information:  was he a guest at winterfell or was he acting as a knight of the kingsguard?  would a knight of the kingsguard get some sort of custom violation exemption consideration?

i would agree with folks who state (in this, my summarization):
- when people come and take over/war with you, there isn't any "invitation" so that doesn't count as a guest/host violation, its like today's insurance clause of 'act of war'.

- if you are in an economic agreement of sorts with someone and then that someone murders you, that would be "murder" and not a guest/host violation.

Hi YaYa--always good to see you!  Would "guest" be extended to anyone in your home, whether they bring their own food or not?  I thought the ideal was safety.  I'm not sure if the deal with giving and taking bread and salt is simply tradition or if it's part of the pact.  Sure would be nitpicky if you don't have protection because you don't eat their food.  Same goes for Jamie's deal, he was part of Robert's entourage and guest right should have included him and Cersei. 

Where in your list do you rate Brienne, Pod, Hyle, Septon Meribald and Dog in this guest right?   They provided the food for everyone at the inn and we know it was a set up to take Brienne.  Should Heddle and Gendry have protected their guests?  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, The Sunland Lord said:

If Theon or Victarion weren't invited nor did ask for hospitality in those castles, it doesn count. They simply took these castles by force. They didn't come "as friends" from the beginning.

 

I see I got a bit carried away with my free association!   Thanks for picking it up and being the voice of clarity.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One important question is, does gust right protect one guest from the other? If there's no such thing than most examples given here aren't actually any violations of it.

From memory, no Bolton is killed in Winterfell, so Mance and Manderly, two decent fellows who adhere to guest right from our earlier encounters with them are still giving it value.

As for Tyrells, "In the eyes of gods and men..." we are often told; Joffrey is a bastard so actually he has no right to be the host, absolving Tyrells.

Roose also has no right to be the host, whether because it is now Ramsay who is Lord of Winterfell or because Boltons have no right to have it, it doesn't matter much.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Corvo the Crow said:

The murder talked of there is the murder of the host.

Yes, but the law quoted there is more general than that.

2 minutes ago, Corvo the Crow said:

We don't see any comments for guest on guest murder.

“There is no crime so foul as for a guest to bring murder into a man’s hall.”

It's about any murder.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/15/2018 at 9:51 PM, Varysblackfyre321 said:

Theon was a prisoner...and he came back to winterfell under the cover of night and seized it by force he was not invited.

Theon was not a guest, he was a hostage, brought to Winterfell to ensure Balon did not revolt again.  Had Theon tried to escape or Balon rebelled again, then Ned would have had the right to punish Theon as he saw fit, including taking his head.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2018-01-16 at 3:39 AM, Agent Orange said:

There will only be consequence if someone has a strong enough motivation to take revenge.  I don't see that happening to the Freys.  The north may hate them but I doubt anybody would be foolish enough to march back down to the Riverlands and start another war. 

This is only true if you exclude BwB and Stoneheart though. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On January 15, 2018 at 4:52 PM, Lyanna<3Rhaegar said:

So I wonder does the guest right protection continue into the next day & the day after as long as the guest has ate & drank? 

And the way I understand it, correct me if I'm wrong, if the guest did not eat or drink whether it was because they refused it or was not offered then there is no guest right correct?

To answer this question; yes. The moment you take a sip of the host's drink and food that has been directly offered (though it appears at least one would suffice), you are privy to guest right.  Based on Mance's conversation with Jon, yes it can last the next day at least. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, Yaya said:

regarding the purple wedding and olena, it could very well be that she didn't eat lannister food, she could have stayed in her own tent or wheelhouse.  she didn't need anything from the lannisters so she didn't have ask for guest right, and since the bedding didn't happen at the wedding, she wasn't kinfolk with the lannister family by law.  worked out great]

She wouldn't need be kinfolk with them to break guest right.

I can't imagine she much cares for the age old superstition surrounding the consequences of violating guest right so I don't see her taking the extreme steps Manderly took to avoid violating it. I mean she's already committing treason and regicide by poisoning Joffery for no apparent reason other than he might be a bad husband to Margary; two f

great sins in it of themselves.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...