The Sunland Lord Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 2 hours ago, Curled Finger said: Hehe he that's just wrong, Man Wrong and cruel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BRANDON GREYSTARK Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 On 1/23/2018 at 0:50 PM, Sea Dragon said: I really hope she does and I wonder where she will find it. I think it was wrong of Viserys to sell it even though people were trying to kill them and they were running. I think this was one of the most important items that proves Daenerys is the rightful ruler of Westeros and not a targaryen lookalike from Essos. I know Daenerys will have dragons and those who do not bow to her will end up as dragon snacks, but I think the crown is important because lost of people follow the crown. Plus Daenerys is the mother of dragons and it would be a nice fit to have the mother crown back. Thank you guys for the great responses. Viserys did the right thing , because starving to death isn't fun . Will she get them back ?No . Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullrout Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 The dragons and her appearance are all the proof needed to prove who she is. A crown can be forged. Documents can be forged. Dragons are authentic and proves her claim to Westeros. Rhaella's crown is touching family heirloom. I've no doubt it will mean something to Dany. I have always seen her arc as moving forward instead of looking at the past. Dany is the storm that brings needed change. Looking back is not what her story arc is about but it is of progress. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Sunland Lord Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 6 minutes ago, Bullrout said: The dragons and her appearance are all the proof needed to prove who she is. A crown can be forged. Documents can be forged. Dragons are authentic and proves her claim to Westeros. Rhaella's crown is touching family heirloom. I've no doubt it will mean something to Dany. I have always seen her arc as moving forward instead of looking at the past. Dany is the storm that brings needed change. Looking back is not what her story arc is about but it is of progress. Exactly. "If I look back I am lost". Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bullrout Posted January 27, 2018 Share Posted January 27, 2018 10 minutes ago, The Sunland Lord said: Exactly. "If I look back I am lost". You're getting the idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Moiraine Sedai Posted January 28, 2018 Share Posted January 28, 2018 On 1/24/2018 at 3:16 PM, Vaedys Targaryen said: I think GRRM used Viserys selling their mother's crown as a way to give Viserys a little bit of a background and won't ever be brought up again. Possible. It is a way to convey the siblings' financial situation. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fattest Leech Posted January 28, 2018 Share Posted January 28, 2018 No. She won’t look back, and if she did, it would be to ruin the Lannisters in a reverse of what happened historically. I’ve never thought this, but beware Tyrion. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bowen Marsh Posted February 1, 2018 Share Posted February 1, 2018 On 1/27/2018 at 6:34 PM, Bullrout said: The dragons and her appearance are all the proof needed to prove who she is. A crown can be forged. Documents can be forged. Dragons are authentic and proves her claim to Westeros. Rhaella's crown is touching family heirloom. I've no doubt it will mean something to Dany. I have always seen her arc as moving forward instead of looking at the past. Dany is the storm that brings needed change. Looking back is not what her story arc is about but it is of progress. But there are powerful forces that wants to turn back the clock and turn the main characters away from moving forward. Qaithe wants Dany to step backwards. Which for Dany means giving up the war with the slavers and instead embrace the role of conqueror. This is the same thing Bloodraven is teaching Bran. Jon has adopted more of the primitive wildling thinking and moved away from the honor code taught by the Starks. Savages have a better chance of surviving the end of civilization. Dany will build her own empire and that calls for a new crown. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sea Dragon Posted February 19, 2018 Author Share Posted February 19, 2018 On January 25, 2018 at 0:30 PM, LiveFirstDieLater said: The point of Rhaella’s crown (I don’t think she was Dany’s Mom) in my opinion is to highlight the discrepancy between Dany’s history as we are first told it and what we later learn... Viserys and Dany were not running from assasins. Illyrio is rich, really really rich, there is no reason they had to beg for years if they were under his care, unless he intended it. Illyrio was planning the Dany-Drogo wedding for years... The servants supposedly stole all Dany and Visery’s valuables... but left the crown? This story has more holes than a cheesmonger’s favorite Swiss Then who do you soppuse is Danaerys's mother? This is a weird idea that Rhaella is not Dany and Viserys mother. It seems pretty clear that her life was troubled from the start, from her birth even. Why would it make sense to have another woman as Danaerys's mother? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiveFirstDieLater Posted February 19, 2018 Share Posted February 19, 2018 11 hours ago, Sea Dragon said: Then who do you soppuse is Danaerys's mother? This is a weird idea that Rhaella is not Dany and Viserys mother. It seems pretty clear that her life was troubled from the start, from her birth even. Why would it make sense to have another woman as Danaerys's mother? Well since you asked... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.