Jump to content

US Politics: Loyalty Oaths for Everyone!


Mexal

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, OldGimletEye said:

And then of course by now, we should know that markets don’t clear leading to aggregate demand failures and the Robert Lucas RBC type models of the world ie “the market will correct itself” are simply wrong, meaning that government action can improve the state of affairs. And certainly we should know by know that super rational homo economicus  doesn’t price assets correctly, though evidently conservatives can’t make their minds up on this issue, seemingly believing it when it’s convenient to blame poor minority people for housing crises, but then switching their opinion when conducting asset mispricing concern trolling when they don’t like monetary policy, but then switching yet back again to super rational homo economicus when attacking Dodd-Frank. Also, I’d be remiss that this year’s winner of the Nobel Prize was Richard Thaler whose work was mainly in behavioral economics, which rejects the model of super rational homo economicus.

Confession: while economics was always my best academic subject in school, I abandoned it after a couple of years at university because I became heartily sick of giving the answer the (right-wing) question wanted, even though I knew full well it was nonsense. The idea of spending the rest of my life rebutting RBC numbskulls did not appeal to me, so I pursued history instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Roose Boltons Pet Leech said:

Confession: while economics was always my best academic subject in school, I abandoned it after a couple of years at university because I became heartily sick of giving the answer the (right-wing) question wanted, even though I knew full well it was nonsense. The idea of spending the rest of my life rebutting RBC numbskulls did not appeal to me, so I pursued history instead.

So now you can spend the rest of your life rebutting Holocaust deniers and all other sorts of whitewashers instead. Good on ya!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This argument could have stopped after "yeah, infant-mortality, but what's a child's life compared to FREEDOM". Freedom, of course, always being directly proportional to one's wealth, but that's the correct definiton of freedom anyway, right?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 hours ago, denstorebog said:

Have you tried actually living in one of the well-functioning Scandinavian socialist countries of today, with their unmatched support for health care, education, parental leave, welfare for the general population, clean environment, etc.? And their record-low rates of crime, political corruption and inequality? Oh, and higher quota of millionaires per citizen, in case you were going to resort to some silly argument about socialism quelling the opportunity for businesses and entrepreneurship.

But they are not purely socialist.  They are a blend of captialism and socialism.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Libertarians think they are the mullet of political philosophy, to wit: They have an economically conservative business front end, but it's a socially liberal party in the back!

Nah, what a joke.

They are mainly guys that like Trump and sit around pissed off about the South losing the Civil War and think Democracy should be replaced with aristocracy or something.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, OldGimletEye said:

Libertarians think they are the mullet of political philosophy, to wit: They have an economically conservative business front end, but it's a socially liberal party in the back!

Nah, what a joke.

They are mainly guys that like Trump and sit around pissed off about the South losing the Civil War and think Democracy should be replaced with aristocracy or something.

I would have defined them as mostly overprivileged bigots who want easier access to drugs and paid sex.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, Ser Scot A Ellison said:

But they are not purely socialist.  They are a blend of captialism and socialism.

Isn't that true of every country? Your government may not provide you with as much as their government does, but no country is truly at either end of that spectrum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ser Scot A Ellison said:

But they are not purely socialist.  They are a blend of captialism and socialism.

:( man, Scandinavia can't catch a break. When something isn't right in the lands of Odin, it's because we're too socialist. When something works, it's because we're actually capitalist

No, but seriously Scot, I'm not really sure what you're saying here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Quote

 

Former Trump campaign adviser Carter Page bragged that he was an adviser to the Kremlin in a letter obtained by TIME that raises new questions about the extent of Page’s contacts with the Russian government over the years.

The letter, dated Aug. 25, 2013, was sent by Page to an academic press during a dispute over edits to an unpublished manuscript he had submitted for publication, according to an editor who worked with Page.

“Over the past half year, I have had the privilege to serve as an informal advisor to the staff of the Kremlin in preparation for their Presidency of the G-20 Summit next month, where energy issues will be a prominent point on the agenda,” the letter reads.

 

Carter Page Touted Kremlin Contacts in 2013 Letter

http://time.com/5132126/carter-page-russia-2013-letter/

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, denstorebog said:

:( man, Scandinavia can't catch a break. When something isn't right in the lands of Odin, it's because we're too socialist. When something works, it's because we're actually capitalist

No, but seriously Scot, I'm not really sure what you're saying here.

The eye of the storm is the worst place to be. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/4/2018 at 8:17 AM, DanteGabriel said:

I would have defined them as mostly overprivileged bigots who want easier access to drugs and paid sex.

Well certainly my way of hatin' on libertarianism isn't the only way to do some hatin' on libertarianism.

People should have the freedom to hate on libertarianism in the way that works best for them. LOL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, denstorebog said:

:( man, Scandinavia can't catch a break. When something isn't right in the lands of Odin, it's because we're too socialist. When something works, it's because we're actually capitalist

It's funny that conservatives would use mass immigration to decry socialism in Scandinavia while conveniently forgetting that they generally view the entire West (including the US) as having the same problem.
It's almost as if they couldn't face the success stories of socialism.

Anyway, socialism and capitalism seem to need/complete each other. At least in our day and age, at this point in our species' evolution.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

48 minutes ago, OldGimletEye said:

Well certainly my way of hatin' on libertarianism isn't the only way to do some hatin' on libertarianism.

People should have the freedom to hate on libertarianism in the way that works best for them. LOL.

Dat's the best kind of freedom.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have always wondered if fascism is the natural outcome of capitalism. Alternatively,  plutocracy and oligarchy. As wealth is concentrated in fewer and fewer hands, aided and abetted by lovely tax cuts that funnel more and more money upwards, fewer people have access to power.

That's the opposite of democracy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...