Tobin Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 Unless he claims that he caught Talbot in a jealous plot as the spurned lover and killed him to protect the king. With the tantrums he threw, it's very plausible that Talbot would take the Queen moving in on his man very badly, despite how gracious he might appear in polite company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imagica Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 I suspect that he'll either collaborate with the Queen or will try to pin the blame on her. There should be a purpose for her being there, after all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AIP Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 I am sure ill get blasted for this but.......1st I am not for or against homosexuals, it's all cool really I am ok with Lafayette and Jesus but come on why does there have to be some gay reference in every show anymore?dream with eric and billthe pam scene where she was you know.....talbot and russell is implyederic and talbotone of the vamps in the 1st season and I am sure there are more.we get it already, thanks.... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alexia Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 Unless he claims that he caught Talbot in a jealous plot as the spurned lover and killed him to protect the king. With the tantrums he threw, it's very plausible that Talbot would take the Queen moving in on his man very badly, despite how gracious he might appear in polite company.There's absolutely no way that Russell would believe this. Talbot's tantrums were part of the dynamic between them - strange to those who don't operate that way, but part of a loving relationship between the two. Talbot was part of the scheme to marry Sophie-Anne and take Louisiana, the two had been together for 700 years and were still very much in love. Eric needs to get the hell out of Dodge and find somebody more powerful who can protect him from Russell or he's screwed.AIP, do you also object to the incessant heterosexual references? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DanteGabriel Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 I am sure ill get blasted for this but.......1st I am not for or against homosexuals, it's all cool really I am ok with Lafayette and Jesus but come on why does there have to be some gay reference in every show anymore?dream with eric and billthe pam scene where she was you know.....talbot and russell is implyederic and talbotone of the vamps in the 1st season and I am sure there are more.we get it already, thanks....If it's all cool, why do you care? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Imagica Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 I think it's to be expected with gay showrunners. Remember Russell T. Davies and the so called "Gay Agenda" on Doctor Who? Well, True Blood is an adult show, so it's more than just references and one male/male kiss :) It actually feels less jarring than on Who, imho. Not to mention there are more than enough heterosexual sex or fanservice. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
awesome possum Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 Yeah, not sure I see a use in complaining about homosexuality in a show where you get to see Anna Paquin naked quite frequently. Or need I remind you of season one's exploration of Lizzy Caplan's fantastic body? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
kungtotte Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 Everybody is fucking all the fucking time in True Blood, why shouldn't there be some gay sex in there as well? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arataniello Posted August 13, 2010 Share Posted August 13, 2010 talbot and russell is implyedI do not think that word means what you think it means. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.