Jump to content

Targaryen madness, Rhaegar and Jon?


Ruby Chevrolet

Recommended Posts

No more than GRRM himself.

Exactly. It's important that it's made clear first what discussions are about: What was the author's idea behind the character vs how do we judge the character objectively.

I think that the numerous discussions about Dany don't come to any conclusion, because one side defends the idea behind her, while the other accuses her based on how she is seen from a rather objective pov, disregarding the author's intent, when actually the latter should be the subject of the discussions instead.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Exactly. It's important that it's made clear first what discussions are about: What was the author's idea behind the character vs how do we judge the character objectively.

I think that the numerous discussions about Dany don't come to any conclusion, because one side defends the idea behind her, while the other accuses her based on how she is seen from a rather objective pov, disregarding the author's intent, when actually the latter should be the subject of the discussions instead.

Partially. GRRM writes on multiple layers simultaneously. We've got to distinguish between the PoV's biases, the in-world objective happenings, the social standards of Planetos, the social standards of Earth, the tropes of literature, the scientific base (as much as somebody with access to a bunch of books, but not a scientist himself would create) and the author's intent.

GRRM loves to show something in the PoV to be true, leave some small clues that it's wrong (pseudo-scientific ones as well) and have it smack somebody in the face three books later.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...