A Horse Named Stranger

Didn't think of you as traditionalist, with me ending up in the modernist camp arguing, the message is whatever you see in it.

Well, GRRM also thought he could deliver it before Season 5 (or was it 6?) of the TV adaption. We all know how that worked out. To be clear, he is entitled to work at his own pace and finish/deliver books as he sees fit, and better shelve it for a year than deliver a bad book. However, that doesn't mean this being the year the book gets published shouldn't be treated as a running gag. Sidenote. Him finishing A Dream of Spring before his 90th birthday gets odds of greater or lower than 1/10.

Shout out to Palace and Glasner for getting 9 points out of what looked like a very tricky run of games on paper. (Liverpool, West Ham and Newcastle)

Not sure if we had this covered, but Xavi reversed his decission and will stay in charge at Barca.

And inability to defend set pieces. Boy that was sorta defending (I guess?) by van Dijk.

The problem wasn't the pass being risky, it was the execution being absolute garbage. It was totally underpowered.

Ah, artist, art, AI. I will try to sum up your point, scot, with a little hyperbole. Art is the product of the work of an artist. What is an artist? Somebody who produces art. So is an AI an artist? If we go by that definition yes. Is it good art or bad art? I am not a critic. If it speaks to you, you enjoy it, then it is art to you, no matter if a machine or a human produced it. Can a machine produce (or generate?) that human experience of art for you? Question of the 21st century. (Wo)Man-machine boundaries. When photography popped up, there was a sorta similar discussion on whether photographers are artists (compared to painters), as they merely point their devilish device at an object and take a snapshot. If you think photography can be art, then by extension you should be able to view AI generations as art, too.

Yeah, but your were moaning about ten Hag being unable to set up a team defensively and you leaking goals left, right and centre. So I felt it was worth pointing out, that this goal was 100% Onana and 0% ten Hag.

Now it was Diaz turn in the inept finisher category at Liverpool. Not as bad as Darwin's miss, but boy Liverpool are back at wasting chances.

Also, that goal in United vs. Sheffield is 100% on Onana and not ten Hag.

Darwin really should've leveled the score there (undeservedly as Everton are better).

You still have to play Spurs. No, I am serious! I've always felt that would be a game you could lose. Again, I am serious!

Now imagine the scoreline if Arsenal had been just a wee bit more clinical with their chances.

But that's your destinaty. You are the chosen one, Anakin.

Somebody start a new thread?