Jump to content

Martyn Bull

Members
  • Content count

    36
  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Martyn Bull

  • Rank
    Freerider

Profile Information

  • Gender
    Male
  • Location
    The North
  1. Martyn Bull

    Bran: a rightful heir?

    Perhaps matrilineal was the wrong word, but Cersei "inherited" the throne from her son. Thus having the throne passing from Baratheon to Lannisters through Joffrey and Tommen. You might think that she has no claim, but what does the realm think? I can't recall anyone really saying that this is questionable. Not even Dany, her major issue with Cersei is that she inherited the throne from the "usurper".
  2. Martyn Bull

    Bran: a rightful heir?

    It wasn't a coincidence I hit this. I think it's quite apparently that GRRM uses this as inspiration for a lot of the conflict in the novels. I didnt know much about the wars in Italy you mention, but the same were true for mist of the monarchies of Europe in the period. In 1066 England was invaded twice by pretenders that meant they had inherited "throne". One of them, William won. Another point is that the Victor wouldn't simply deny anything the King he had deposed had done. The Victor needed the people to believe in the power of "the Crown", so they would rather tell the story where they we were the rightful rulers, and to keep the peace, accept most of the laws the deposed monarch had made. My impression is that GRRM is quite inspired by what happened in Europe from let's say around 1000 to 1700, and a lot of that history are bloody wars, civil wars and conquering based on unclear inheritance rules for the throne. However, each war usually made inheritance a little clearer.
  3. Martyn Bull

    Bran: a rightful heir?

    I would rather say it was because the throne had passed through two underaged Kings with her as the defacto monarch, that it was possible for her to inherit Tommen. But it's kind of made a presedence for that the throne can move outside of the King's House. And, yes - Tyrion for sure has a strong claim inherited from Cersei in this theory.
  4. Martyn Bull

    Bran: a rightful heir?

    But IF he hadn't turned down the throne. Cersei made a presedence that the throne could be inherited the matrilineal way. I agree that the southern Lords wouldn't necessarily allow the same person to be King in the North and of the Iron throne, so the theory would require that Sansa becomes Queen of the North (or if Bran gets that title, Sansa would be his heir).
  5. Martyn Bull

    Bran: a rightful heir?

    Fair enough. There should have been an great IF in the original post. What happens if Jon claims the title after murdering Dany. He certainly has a strong claim. Let's say the council accepts this, who's then his heir if he chooses to abdicate? The thought came to me when I tried to imagine how GRRM might land on Bran (if it's true that this is from him). Although it's true that whoever can take and keep the throne by might is the King/Queen. All the Kings/Queens we have seen have constructed some kind of argument on why they were the rightful heir.
  6. Martyn Bull

    Bran: a rightful heir?

    I think boys are preferred to girls when it comes to inheritance of titles in Westeros. Bran is Robb's heir, not Sansa as Lord of Winterfell. The rules might be different for the Iron throne, in which case, yes, Sansa would be the heiress.
  7. Martyn Bull

    Bran: a rightful heir?

    Dany took the iron throne by force from Cersei, so for a short time, she's Queen of the Seven Kingdoms. Dany's heir would be John, so when he killed her, he was the rightful heir of the iron throne. Wouldn't Bran be Johns heir? So when John "abdicates" the throne should actually have passed to Bran.
  8. Martyn Bull

    Daenerys the Terrible?

    You said: "Dany did nothing that was contrary to the laws of chivalry, in the show." The chivalric oath of the 7 kingdoms is: "In the name of the Warrior I charge you to be brave. In the name of the Father I charge you to be just. In the name of the Mother I charge you to defend the young and innocent. In the name of the Maid I charge you to protect all women." If you think Dany did adhere to this, I think we just must agree that we disagree, because I don't.
  9. Martyn Bull

    Daenerys the Terrible?

    Yes, but you didn't talk about the ethic of warfare, you talked about "the laws of chivalry": In my opinion she did things that was clearly breaking the chivalric code within the fictional world.
  10. Martyn Bull

    Daenerys the Terrible?

    Oath of Knighthood: "In the name of the Warrior I charge you to be brave. In the name of the Father I charge you to be just. In the name of the Mother I charge you to defend the young and innocent. In the name of the Maid I charge you to protect all women." I would say she at least bended it a little? Don't necessarily disagree with you here. However, it would feel less contrived than the "and now let's choose a ruler" - at least to me.
  11. Martyn Bull

    How would you have ended it?

    Again I agree. But when the decided they weren't able to finish both plots at the same time, I would rather have season 7 deal with NK and the WW and FINISH that plotline in a good way. Then have the entire seadson 8 to focus on the "realm of men". That would certainly include getting more out of R+L=J. If not proofs, just people starting to choose sides. To me it's more about that, having the opinions of the lords and people actually matter, not only the claims. I think that would have made it more believable to send Dany off the cliff - Jon won the popularity contest (of course against his will).
  12. Martyn Bull

    Daenerys the Terrible?

    Yes, you are right, he could have executed her for whatever reason, but I don't think he would have. Martin is moving to some kind of "breaking the wheel" as Dany phrases it (at least in my opinion), and I think it's more likely it would be some kind of tribunal or council that would've judged Dany.
  13. Martyn Bull

    How would you have ended it?

    Thanks. Backing you 100% on explanation of NK, but I took the challenge and tried to answer the original post who asked what you would change in the last TWO episodes :-) If you asked me what I'll do with the last two seasons, I'll say, end NK (with explanation) in s07, and spend the entire s08 to finish the game of thrones...
  14. Martyn Bull

    Daenerys the Terrible?

    As I said, my knowledge of Westerosi law isn't good enough to say wether she's broken any laws, but we have seen that it's the within the King's power to judge. In my opinion it would be cool if Jon had to judge Dany, and eventually pick up from S01E01 and have Jona have to do the execution.
  15. Martyn Bull

    Daenerys the Terrible?

    I don't know enough about the juridical system of Westeros to really answer that, but I guess Sam could dig something up ... That wouldn't actually be the worst shortcut they've made, but there is at least two other ways they could have gone around. They could have made Jon to actually act and claim the throne. As a king, he would have the authority (I suppose), or they could have made a kind of tribunal (or perhaps a combination). That could have picked up in a cool way on the "power resides where the people believes it reside", that in the end it is the "people" of Westeros that decides that they are finished with Targaryan dragonlords.
×