Jump to content

The Merling King

  • Posts

  • Joined

  • Last visited

Everything posted by The Merling King

  1. What is your opinion of Vikings Valhalla on Netflix? I personally thought it was subpar compared to The Last Kingdom and even the first couple seasons of the original History channel show Vikings. If I could have changed one thing it would be to make Prince Edmond more like his historical counter part Edmond Ironside, who was more like Rob Stark, a great young military strategist who won victories against overwhelming odds and actually battled Cnut and his army to a stalemate before his death, then what the show depicted as a nicer version of Joffrey, the spoiled and arrogant prince.
  2. I finished episode 8 last night and have been enjoying this season so far. I wish we got more numbers on the sizes of the various armies for example the West Saxon host King Edward brought north, the Mercian guard, Athelhelm and Sytriggers armies etc. Any one have an educated guess or estimate? I can’t remember if in the previous seasons they mention how many men Lord Odda or Lord Athelhelm, the two most powerful Eldorman in Wessex, could raise in there Fyrd.
  3. If Robert Baratheon and Ned Stark were less morally superior, clear-cut heroes and had the more polarizing and unlikable personalities and attitudes of say Borros Baratheon and Creagan Stark, would it change the readers views on Robert’s Rebellion’s or make them more sympathetic to the Targaryen’s if that is even possible?
  4. To eliminate some of those butterflies, I could revise the question too, what if Daemon Blackfyre II was killed at the Whitewalls Tourney and Bittersteel and Haegon Blackfyre invade earlier but I agree the Targaryens would most likely still come out on top.
  5. It sounds like Daemon Blackfyre was similar to Renly Baratheon in his ability to attract the Westerosi warrior class of younger sons, hedge knights and free riders to his cause. Plus even the partial support of house Hightower, Lothstron, Frey, Tarbeck and Oakheart etc, could have produced a substantial levy. I am very curious about what happened in the Stormlands. We are told of fighting in the Vale and Stormlands but not if it was against external or internal houses. The only house in either region that is confirmed to have supported the Blackfyres was the Sunderlands and Sistermen probably could not do much more then raid the coasts of the Vale, which seemed to be heavily loyalist. As for the Stormlands, the only house we know that definitely supported one side prior to the Red Grass field, were the Penrose's and probably the Dondarions because of marriage ties to the Targs. I wonder if the other marchers like Caron’s and Selmys originally backed the Blackfyres and if the Baratheons sat it out like they did durring the Dance until Baelor Breakspear personally showed at Storms End. We know very little about the Targaryen-Baratheon relationship between the dance and the Blackfyre rebellions and the Baratheon’s could have arguably gained more from the Blackfyres.
  6. It does make me wonder why people think the Blackfyres had a legit chance of winning the first or third rebellion with little to no support from the great houses. If you exclude the minor houses and ones that backed both sides, we are basically left with maybe the Peakes, Yronwoods, Brackens and Reynes. King Daeron and Baelor Breakspear and even Bloodraven and Maekar were much stronger and secure then King Aerys and Rhaegar and it took 4 L.P.’s to overthrow the latter. Was Eustace and the other Black dragon supporters just exaggerating and being overly nostalgic, because even if they won the Redgrass Field, there would still be a dozen Targaryens left inside Kingslanding.
  7. What do you think would have happened if Daemon Blackfyre stayed loyal to King Daeron and waited until after the spring sickness to rebel, when the drought and ironborn raiding, would have brought anti-Targaryen sentiment to an all-time high? Could King Aerys, Bloodraven, Prince Meakar & his family defeat Daemon without the leadership of King Daeron II and Prince Baelor Breakspear, assuming the Blackfyres gets the same support in 210ac as he did in 196ac
  8. If Daemon Blackfyre and his descendants stayed in line, I could see them becoming similar to the Beauforts, a legitimized bastard branch of the royal family.
  9. If Whitewalls was not demolished by Bloodraven but confiscated and given/absorbed into the lands of Harrenhall around the Godseye after the second Blackfyre rebellion, do you think the lord (Lothstron or Whents) could avoid the curse by abandoning Harrenhall and ruling the large fief from Whitewalls?
  10. What if there was a legitimate male-line Targaryen cadet branch that still existed at the beginning of Robert’s rebellions? For example if king Aegon V has a fourth son, who is given Summerhall or a Lordship confiscated during one of the Blackfyre rebellions and his son or grandson denounces king Aerys II at the start of the rebellion?
  11. I agree and think it would make more sense if either Viserys claimed another dragon or they kept Balerion alive longer. Instead of Balerion dying, he could have become more lethargic and immobile but still capable of one more nuclear strike if needed. He could eventually die a couple years or right before Viserys. This would better explain why Daemon and the Velaryons never challenged his rule and why the realm was at peace with no Iron born and Dornishman testing the easy going party king.
  12. Aemon and Jocelyn having a son that died young would not change the plot that much but could be used to explain why they didn't/couldn't have more children besides Rhaenys. I think the bigger issue is the succession between Viserys-Rhaenyra/Aegon and the dance in general would have made more sense if below. 1) Viserys did not remarry and one of his sons with Aemma Arryns survived until at least adolescents or became another victim of the red spring in 120AC. This son could have been engaged to Laena Valeryon in place of Rheanyra and the Rhaenyra and Laenor match could have been a last minute replacement to keep the Velaryons happy and ensure Viserys bloodline continues on the iron throne. Damon could have still made the "heir for a day" remark about another son the died with Aemma. 2) Aegon, son of Baelon could have lived and married Alicent Hightower and had Aegon, Helaina, Aemond and Daron, 3) Maybe make Aegon the elder at least a little sympathetic and likable to contrast Rhaenyra. He doesn't have to be as outwardly charismatic and chivalrous as Renly or Damon Blackfyre but I think it would have added more nuance if he started out at least a little decent or even Harrold Hardyingish and was eventually manipulated by his mother and grandfather and then goes downhill after the death of Jaehaerys and the burns/injuries/addiction. Plus Aemond is a big enough asshole for the greens to match Daemon. This would have have made the dance more realistic in my opinion, if Westeros had to choose between the kings chosen heir Rhaenyra (a spoiled woman with supposed bastard children), the kings brother Daemon (who was removed from succession and has made many enemies throughout Westeros) and the kings nephew Aegon (a spoiled son of the kings youngest brother but who has the support of the Hightower's and many other powerful families) as opposed to the king choosing his older legitimate daughter over a younger legitimate son in a medieval aristocracy when said king was chosen over the older female line to begin with...
  13. Jon Hightower was the last hand for Aegon IV and also brought Sereni of Lys to court. I can only imagine that Lord Hightower was not happy to be removed from court with the other sycophants by Daeron ii and replaced by the Dornish….
  14. Dragonstone and Driftmark had more power and prestige during the dance but if you remove the dragons from the equation, I think Rhaenyra would be in a similar situation to Stannis without Mel.
  15. Aemond and Cole leaving KL to hunt Daemon and then Aemond leaving Cole to burn the Riverlands instead of linking up with the Hightower host and his fellow dragon riding brother are arguable the two stupidest decisions the greens make.
  16. Viserys II was made pretty powerful by Aegon III and basically helped rule and keep things together for his brother and nephews. He also might have poisoned his crazy nephew and pretty much skipped over his three nieces to take the iron throne without the need of a great council.
  17. I agree Bloodraven was cautious with Dunk and Egg for fear of upsetting or provoking Maekar to leave Summerhall. I don’t believe Maekar would have rebelled against his older brother and even if Bloodraven took Egg to court as a hostage, I doubt it would come to war because King Aerys would probably just put his foot down on the rare occasion and tell Bryden to send him home like he told them Bittersreel was going to the wall and not the block. I think If king Aerys predeceased Rhaegel or Aelor, Meakar might take issue with bloodraven trying to become regent for his mentally ill brother or minor nephew. Summerhall would give hime a power base but as stated, we don’t know anything about the lands, manpower or defensibility if the castle. Maekar would probably need to make alliances dependent on his military record and the general dislike of Bloodraven.
  18. I’m not sure killing Aegon the younger would have helped Aegon ii in his current situation but if Baella Targaryen had been captured or killed in the beginning, that would mean Sunfyre is not further injured and might be able to heal enough to fly and burn the Lads on the Kingsroad. Would the North and Vale still attack Kingslanding if Aegon II had the Stormlords and a semi-functioning dragon? The only other way I could see the greens winning more then a Pyrrhic victory even if he killed Rhaenyra and Aegon the younger, is if Boris Baratheon and the Stormlords had defeated the Lads and Riverlords, then maybe either Unwin Peake or Lionel Hightower (who refused the blacks peace in OTL but did nothing while Aegon II was still alive or when he heard Rhaenyra was killed or the Greens regained the capital...) reorganized the Oldtown/Reach and maybe Westerland forces to help defend Kingslanding against the Vale and North. Then if the Redwyne fleet could get Aegon II off Dragonstone and he offered general pardons maybe there could have been an uneasy peace between the Blacks and greens. But the greens were so incompetent and meant to lose from the start with so many Reach houses fighting against the Hightowers for no reason, the Redwyne fleet MIA, the Westerlands and Stormlands getting taken out in one or two battles, while the Riverlands are unstoppable and the North and Vale are left largely uninvolved and unharmed until the end. I think Aegon ii burned too many bridges and the Blacks would not bend the knee unless he had a dragon or larger army. Perhaps if Aegon died of his wounds naturally after killing Rhaenyra and Aegon the younger and Prince Daeron or Maelor survived and were propped up by the greens, it would been easier to come to a compromise.
  19. I agree both sides were led by horrible people and did horrible things but I think the blacks take the cake with Blood and cheese and also that Aegon II was the rightful heir by custom and the precedent set forth by the great council. I can’t think of any historical example were a king wants his elder daughter to succeed over a legitimate son. I find it unrealistic and personally think it would make more sense if Alicent Hightower would have married a third brother of Viserys and Daemon instead of Viserys, thus making Rhaenyra and the Targaryen-Hightower children cousins and King Viserys with only one child and no alternative heir of his own blood. That would at least be realistic and closer to the the historical basis of the Anarchy and civil war between Emperess Matilda and her cousins Stephen. With that said, the blacks do have a more likable supporting cast but the greens were written to be unlikable and incompetent from the start, even more so in F&B then TOATQ, like when John Roxton is made to be a rapist and Daeron the Daring is turned into a war criminal at Bitterbridge.
  20. Also because of the immortal family lines of the great houses and the importance of last names in Westeros, it would be hard for someone to become as powerful as say John of Gaunt or even Stephen of Blois, who were of royal blood but got most of there power by marrying a female heiress with wealthy lands and important titles. Its debatable if King Jaehaerys was trying to do this with prince Daemon by marrying him off to Rhea Royce but I assume that if they had any children they would take the Royce name like Joffrey Lynden took the Lannister name. I’m also surprised Alicent Hightower did not try to get a Baratheon marriage earlier for one of her sons in the hopes that Borros would not end up having a male heir and they inherit Stormsend either as lord or consort to the lady. But in general this doesn’t seem possible or very common in Westeros, at least up until recently with Tommen Baratheon having a claim to Kingslanding, Dragonstone, Stormsend and Casterly Rock but he will most likely not live long enough to grant these appendages to any children or favorites. Another recent example would be the Lannister’s taking over Darry and Hayford through marriage to female heirs but going against tradition and using the husbands name to replace the attainted or near extinct name of the female heiress. Also the Frey and Tyrells seem to be using there names to lay claim to the ancestral homes of the attainted Tully’s and Florents. Its interesting that after surviving uninterrupted for several millennia, that so many families seem to be dying out during the war of the five kings and leaving lands and lordships ripe for the taking but there is no mention of this occurring during or after the Conquest, the Dance or Blackfyre rebellions except for the cursed Harrenhal and the Peakes loosing two or there three castles.
  21. I could understand that argument in regards to Stannis and Renly but Baelor was the crown prince, hand of the king and protector of the realm... I think Baelor could have commanded his brother and nephews but was pragmatic enough to know it would open up a can of worms if he straight up pardoned someone for striking a prince of the blood or siding with a hedge Knight over his brother and nephews. I’m sure he was aware Blackfyre sympathizers would take note of any weakness or disfunction in the royal family.
  22. Did any post-dragon Targaryen prince have the power to contest the succession like Stannis and Renly Baratheon did or were none of the past princes as empowered as the Baratheon bros? Obviously a dragon grants you more power than a lordship and dragon riders like prince Maegor, the rogue prince Daemon, the Hightower-Targaryens and the Velaryon-Targaryens could/would contest sussesion but what about Targaryens post dance. Stannis showed off the limited resources of Dragonstone and I assume Summerhall had similar resources, wealth and manpower?
  23. Does House Velaryon and Redwyne have cadet branches and smaller vassals similar to House Harlaw? Harlaw seems more fleshed out and developed then either Driftmark or the Arbor due to the many Ironborn POV's but I was curious what people think. I would understand if Dragonstone is to small and infertile for multiple castles or holdfasts but I would think Driftmark or the Arbor would have just as many vassals or cadet branches as Harlaw. The Velayrons did have at least two castles, Driftmark and Hightide during there peak before the Dance of the Dragons but there was a plethora of uncles, nephews and cousins for Corliss as well as two thriving towns.
  24. If king Daeron II was present at the Tourney of Ashford would there still be a trial by seven? Baelor Breakspear seemed to be aware of his nephew Aerion’s nature and perhaps the king was as well. Baelor was chivalrous and idealistic but was pragmatic enough to know that he could not openly side against his family or completely upend the system and pardon a hedge knight for striking a prince of the blood royal without it potentially having far reaching consequences and it was only when Aerion cowardly invoked the right to trial by seven and he saw that great injustice was about to take place that he decided that he must do what was right despite the consequences. If king Daeron II was at the tourney would he have been more capable of putting an end to the trial or forcing single combat especially after Baelor decides to fight for Dunk? Would it be more embarrassing for the King and Targaryen family to pardon a hedge Knight and punish a secondary prince then see the crown prince fight his brother, nephews and kingsguard over said hedge Knight?
  25. Are you suggesting it would have been possible for Renly to stay neutral or offer token forces to either Joffrey or Stannis and possibly survive longer or until the current post Tywin chaos? I’m not sure Renly would have considered it at the time as he had the largest army and did not believe that Stannis was a legitimate threat with Melisandre or that the Tyrells wouldn’t jump ship to the Lannister’s if he accepted Stannis offer even if Stannis named Renly (and Margery’s potential child) heir to the throne.
  • Create New...