Jump to content

Lilac & Gooseberries

Members
  • Posts

    757
  • Joined

Posts posted by Lilac & Gooseberries

  1. 40 minutes ago, KingAerys_II said:

    The book says he was a skilled warrior, not me, the only battle that injured Robert was against Rhaegar, who was an excellent jouster too

    When was Rhaegar tested as a fighter in a battle? Because as I recall he only participated in one battle and he died. Robert was injured before his battle with Rhaegar and he cleaned off his way to reach him.

  2. 3 hours ago, Lady Stonehearts Simp said:

    Do you think Daenerys will go full villain? Or do you think it’ll be more complicated than that?

    No. Definitely no. For all her faults Dany isn't an evil character and deep down she wants to help. However good intentions don't always have a good result. The havoc she caused in SB is the good example for this.

  3. Fire consumes, but cold preserves. 

    As I have told way too many times before both fire or ice are the villains. Without ice fire will burn everything and without fire ice will freeze everything. It's the balance between fire and ice that will bring the serenity. Both the Others with the Great Other and the dragons with Rhllor need to be exterminated in order for the humanity to survive.

  4. 39 minutes ago, Lady Stonehearts Simp said:

     

    3. Ned and Ashara

    4. Brandon and Ashara

    As much as I would prefer Jon not being Rhaegar's seed but instead Ned's, or Brandon's,  neither of those choice is possible. Brandon died 2 years before Jon's birth and the only time Ned and Ashara were in the same place was even before Brandon's death. I do think that Ned and Ashara had a child. But they had a daughter not a son.

  5. On 4/30/2023 at 9:33 PM, kissdbyfire said:

    I’ve used the same comparison plenty of times to refute some of these crazy and unsupported “theories”! :lol:

    And this as well. And here I’m not even talking only about the mad haters, but many readers who support different theories for Jon’s parentage that would require him to be significantly older than we are led to believe. And not once has anyone been capable of explaining away the fact that Cat fully believes what she is told irt Jon’s age. And there’s just no way in 7 hells anyone could mistake a toddler for a baby. 

    To me this is what makes those discussions so boring. If they tried to make a case for their "theories" then it would had been a little more interesting. 

×
×
  • Create New...