Jump to content


  • Content Count

  • Joined

  • Last visited

About Jo498

  • Rank
    Council Member

Profile Information

  • Gender
  • Location

Previous Fields

  • Name

Recent Profile Visitors

6,929 profile views
  1. Now that I think about it, are there two versions of the Salem story by King (one novel one novella or short story)? Or did King also write a very similar short vampire story? As I seem to recall it, neither was bad but especially the long version didn't live up to the hype as it supposedly was the book that put King on the map but reading it 30+ years later it seemed a fairly "standard" vampire/horror story? And one reason could have been that I had read the other version long before and then remembered common plot elements.
  2. That one is dealing with some kind of vampire is also rather obvious from the actual cases of the vampire's victims, isn't it? While it goes with a certain tradition, to me it seems often very difficult to find a balance between the superpowers of vampires on the one hand and the options of quick and easy defeat. Because daylight or garlic are too easy, some authors simply skip them and they become even more ridiculosuly powerful than before.
  3. But they are loathsome. Seductiveness does not mitigate evil, quite the contrary. If someone is a supernaturally dangerous powerful killer (or rather transformer to a fate worse than death) it doesn't matter that s/he is also an immortal seductively glamourous sexy "rock star". There is simply no way the latter characterization could "balance" the former or somehow make it morally acceptable. This is different from the attraction of pirates or rebels because they often have a just cause, at least to some extent. Despite the ingeniosity of Rice or the woman who wrote the stuff "True Blood" was based on this is an extremely implausible case to make for vampires. Furthermore, to keep it exciting, all these books/movies/series also have obviously evil vampires, so the repulsion humans have is completely justified (because if something is so bloody dangerous and powerful as vampires usually are, one simply needs to err on the side of caution). The best one can do plausibly, I think, is to evoke a certain pity like with a rueful but madly driven serial rapist/killer who cannot master his impulse.
  4. One reason for this is probably that the billionaire today is so sure he has absolutely nothing to fear for his power status from such remarks, so he will not bother. However, I think that in many not quite first world countries, you might end up at the business end of a weapon after a wrong public remark about a powerful billionaire.
  5. The only Powers I read was Anubis Gates and I loved that book. I cannot imagine that he wrote something as horrible as the book on Polidori etc. even granting that Powers might be an author of uneven quality. I suspect that the book I meant could have been "The Merciful Women" (Las Piadosas) by Federico Andahazi because the German title (Lord Byrons Schatten) seems familiar. It wasn't really about vampires at all, now that I think of it, only about the writing of that famous "Vampyre".
  6. One point against the broadly social democrat welfare states is that they are not very stable. Not in the sense of collapsing altogether but they have been gradually yielding to corporations and never got rid of HUGE differentials in wealth, income, personal independence and political power. (One can argue that this was somewhat better for a few decades from the 1950s through the 80s or 90s but this is also true for the US, only it lasted a bit longer in Europe.) Another is that the levels of consumerism, wastefulness and environmental impact of Sweden and the US are clearly in the same ballpark, even if healthcare is organized differently. So if the main point (as for some discutants here) are severe measures to curb enviromental impact/global warming, the track record of the European style social democracies is not that different from e.g. the US, so it is highly doubtful that a bit of social democracy would help a lot here. In fact, Rippounet seems to avoid a crucial point above: "Democratic" control of energy etc. by the majority of the populace in some European country would almost certainly not result in a vote for austerity and a drastically less comfortable lifestyle (which would be necessary for reducing global footprints etc). This could only be achieved by "benevolent" dictators. I doubt that this is a real option. Most countries (except some East Asian, NZ and Australia) are obviously overtaxed by Covid (both by coming up with rational measures and by enforcing them). It's pure fantasy that current administrations could enforce measures reducing the standard of living for most people by 30-50% without creating riots and anarchy. And obviously they wouldn't get democratic majorities for such measures either.
  7. These two options are not exhaustive. I'd bet that Calmet considered and apparently rejected this, but one obvious (and I think traditionally considered) option is that undead are a kind of demonic phenomenon, i.e. some evil spirit somehow animates the dead body. (This also fits with the idea that devils and demons, unable of original creation, mock and ape God's creation/action and what could be a better example of this than undead half-life instead of real eternal life?) I think I have read about 4 vampire books (discounting short stories). "Salem's lot" I found also rather disappointing, nothing special at all. I never read Dracula but I read Polidori's "Vampyre" and a totally weird book about that summer of Byron, Polidori, the Shelleys in Switzerland that also brought some supernatural element into it but its was so bad that I forgot author and title. And the first book of Lukianenko's series "Nochnoi dozor". Fairly original and atmospheric but lengthy and not enthralling enough to keep going with the series. I probably should read "Dracula" at some stage.
  8. They used to be called Aunt Agatha or Honoria Glossop. And once one thinks about it, such clichées seem more damning on the Uncle whatevers and Bertie Woosters of the world because they are so easily intimidated by such females of the species (being deadlier than the male). More seriously, as I understood the meme, gender and age are incidental, the core is mostly someone behaving annoyingly and haughtily towards people in tough and (usually low paid and low status) service jobs. Not sure if younger women or middle aged men do this less frequently than the supposedly typical "Karen". There are certainly cultural and personal differences here as well. I am annoyed easily but absolutely hate complaining and so I usually won't but this can have the effect that when I actually bring myself to complain about something I can tend to be severe and uncompromising but because of my general character I would never be able to raise Hell like Meme Karens do.
  9. The very first Rebus "Knots and crosses" contains a fat title clue the protagonist and colleagues miss for a long time and I have seen a cover that basically resolves it! I totally missed it because as a non-native speaker I wasn't familiar with the name of the game and I am horrible with clues/puns based on (near) homophones because I read/write far more English than I speak and listen to (OTOH there was an anagram clue in "The falls" I saw before the investigators) and I had an omnibus edition with a more neutral cover.
  10. As I read five in English and only one in German, the translation can hardly be the main problem. I liked the atmosphere of the first three books and there is some in "Black and Blue" with the extraordinary places like an oil platform. But I clearly have the impression that Rankin got worse (and also far more "ordinary" and less special/scottish?). The popsong sillyness only popped up later and while drinking as a pastime and vice had a role since the beginning the utterly boring gory details about the precise drinks and snacks of every bloody lunchbreak, or literally every line of trivial banter among the colleagues was not in the early books (or at least not to such an annoying extent). Not every details creates atmosphere or characterises a character, there is a point when it feels like routinely filling up pages. Next recommendations I received are books by John Harvey, Reginald Hill, Tana French and William Brodrick? Any comments on these?
  11. It's also a very bad list for someone starting in the Genre. There is one thing restricting oneself to mainstream mostly english language post-Tolkien fantasy, but even then hugely important classics of the last 60 years are (largely) missing, Vance, Zelazny, Anderson, Wolfe, Moorcock, Brooks, Williams etc.... And then they should also have skipped the two fairy tale collection or old epics. They are also inconsistent wrt "magical realism", including Tutuola but not other better known authors like Marquez.
  12. I liked the first three with Rebus, so I do not want to condemn the whole series, but as I wrote, I was disappointed by all of the later ones I read. The character changed towards a far less interesting type and Siobhan who apparently is to become a major side character is utterly boring in "The falls" where she has already an important rôle. I think he only started the pop song references later. I find them cringeworthy and also that (despite me being usually far from the current woke sensibility in these matters), like Rowling's Cormoran he is shown as a fairly unattractive man both in appearance and manners, Rebus is also workoholic and borderline alcoholic, but has no problems getting laid, although not with supermodel girls like Strike, they are intelligent and attractive women who can hardly be that desperate.
  13. I read two more of the Rebus series and unfortunately, I still find the first three the best of the now six books I read. Black and Blue is a bit too long and way too ambitious with too many cases and persons intricately combined and really stressing plausibility at times. But such are faults easy to overlook as overall it still moved along nicely for the most part. But The Falls (which I read in German translation because I can get these for free from a library) was really bad. The mediocre translation didn't help but this was overlong, convoluted, boring, somewhat predictable, not really exciting at all. I understand that Rankin loves Scotland and Edinburgh but half page or longer infodumps on local stuff are getting tedious (and I can't even know if real or made up, he did make up a historical figure but one cannot tell from the infodumps if they are about a real or made up historical killer, case or doctor). So are the excruciating details about what everyone is eating, drinking and I also came to dislike the "trademark" mentionings of pop songs (I usually don't know being in the wrong age bracket and generally not much interested in popular music). I'll try two more because I already borrowed them ("Resurrection Men" and "A question of blood")
  14. The ridiculous thing is that the German passport did have both spellings even back then. The one with "ö" was in the main body of the personal information, the other with "oe" in some different section at the bottom. But the person at the office that was responsible for giving out state ID cards in Seattle could not be convinced to use "oe" instead of "o". I tried several minutes but when you realize that you are not gaining ground and are beginning to annoy clerk whose service you need you better give up. Fortunately, I don't recall that it ever caused any major trouble later on although it is annoying to have different spellings on ID documents, bank or credit cards etc.
  15. I am surprised as well. As a German with an umlaut in the last name this was a major pain when I studied for one year in the US in the mid-1990s. In effect, my name was spelled in three different ways on different ID documents (German passport, Student ID, WA state ID, I don't remember if the debit card had a name one it and which spelling...) because some people in the US didn't understand that the next best to "ö" was "oe" and insisted on "o" on the ID document.
  • Create New...