Jump to content

RhaenysBee

Members
  • Posts

    4,787
  • Joined

Posts posted by RhaenysBee

  1. I’m watching Bones (still), and I don’t understand why 

    Spoiler

    this bloody show hates Hodgins so much. I’m so pissed about this. Well originally I was absolutely pissed when Hodgins lost his fortune in an insanely idiotic way during the Pelant plot and it was never recovered after Pelant died. And now, after the show made Hodgins self - made in an off camera storyline (so ridiculous) - I could go on and on about how much I dislike this plot event as well-, Hodgins is about to have another kid and bamm, sorry he’s paralyzed. For crying out loud Booth was shot every couple seasons without  repercussions. Wendell healed from the cancer that was introduced as an illness with an 10% survival rate. Aubrey was at an arrest a day after he was in surgery to get shrapnel out of him. But Hodgins was in an explosion so he’s paralyzed. Are you serious? Why couldn’t Hodgins get some less permanent or less disabling consequences?
     

    on a similar note, It’s just so unfair and disheartening that the show gets rid of characters in depressing ways. They get killed (Sweets, the British intern) or they are locked up (Zach), if they do quit they end up drifting back (Daisy, Vaziri) because their career plans outside the Jeffersonian fall through (even though they are supposed to be world class experts or at least trained by one). Nobody quits and rides off into the sunset and lives happily ever after, because neither fulfillment and happiness nor success and financial advancement exist beyond the Jeffersonian. All the while it’s coming up Milhouse  for Brennan who’s happily married, a perfect mother, a best selling author with a huge fortune and somehow still the world’s best forensic anthropologist because days are 36 hours long in her parallel universe. Nobody can be as happy, as healthy, as wealthy, as successful or as fulfilled as Brennan. 

    I really like the whodunnit aspect of this show and I really like Booth and I really like that they try to discuss some social/political/anthropological topic in every episode, and I love that when Bones was written it was still allowed to show both sides of the coin and represent opposite perspectives on the subjects as equal opinions, that’s very refreshing. But man, I have so many issues with the larger story. 


    I also watched The Help on Sunday. It was heartwarmingly lovable. It was slightly oddly paced and the tension didn’t always work out as they intended, some character stories were lacking, but the (main cast) acting was superb  and the effort for nuance was there. Octavia Spencer herself is enough reason to watch this movie. She did have more opportunity to showcase her full acting prowess in the mini series about CJ Walker’s life, but she brought her usual warmth and force of nature to this movie as well. It wasn’t anything mind blowing, but it’s a sweet movie for a chill weekend. I wouldn’t rewatch it, but I do recommend it above mentioned occasions. In fact,  I might rewatch it with my mum, just because I know she would enjoy this movie for its atmosphere and being an Octavia Spencer fan.

  2. Turns out I didn’t even have 2.5 half episodes left, I had only the 0.5 to go. I suppose all seasons have been 8 episodes and I should have remembered that, but why the fck would you cut it off after 5 and release 3 separately? Why not halve it? 

    Anyway. It had potential, but ended up going off the rails and was an eventual train wreck. Referring back to the previous point of discussion, I did have to Google at least three things the show should have made clear to make sense of what turned out to be the final episode. 

    there was a lot I didn’t like and a few things that did work beautifully, so let’s start with those. 
     

    Spoiler

    I sort of expected Ciri’s desert excursion to be glossed over in a 5-10 minute sequence and I was pleasantly surprised to find that they actually adapted that chapter and kept(ish) its structure and arch. Freya Allen did an amazing job, she is cut out for more than the script allows in essential every other scene of the season. Costume continuity was all over the place but let’s not get nitpicky. I appreciate that we actually spent time with Ciri and didn’t let her get out of the desert very easily. I loved the cinematography, I liked that I could at least smell the effort in the script. Not saying it worked out in the end, but there were traces of intention to weave plot and message together. 

    I also very much liked that Fringilla and Francesca ended up divided and were ready to throw each other under the bus because they each had different motivations. This sort of saved the story from descending into good guys vs bad guys, which it’s been edging dangerously close to this past season. 

    Jaskier had a couple good moments when he was allowed to be the bard again in Brokilon with Geralt. The whole Brokilon bit was otherwise a mess but Jaskier did have a flashback to his actual character which was great and showed in Joey Batey’s acting. 

    The Rats introduction was kinda all right. I liked that the Redanian servant was the one to kill Vizimir, that was a good save. I liked Ciri’s song, I really liked those three seconds when Stregobor lived up to his position and swooshed his cloak to hold up the enemy with his fire magic and buy the other mages some time, that was a lovely moment there. I liked the bit when Tissaia did the last resort spell and her hair turned white.

    I think that was about all that I liked. 


    And onto the myriad of problems. 
     

    Spoiler

    The show is incapable of leading a plot or keeping up any sense of consistency. The world building is still atrocious and the characters are still made a joke of. The curious thing is that the show so often provides messages and takeaways I’m not sure they intend at all. 

    There was no transition between the ball episode and the battle episode, it took me half the coup scene to have a faint clue of what’s going on since we left Yennefer and Geralt who just figured out (based on absolutely nothing other than contrivance and wild conclusion jumps) that Vilgefortz was the bad guy. The show never established what the scoiatael was and I don’t really remember either, so it’s pure guesswork why and how this faction is turning up at Thanedd. Filavandrel’s death was as pathetic as everything else about his character. The Vilgefortz v Geralt fight made me laugh out loud, the dude literally beat the Witcher up with an oversized drill bit. What a ludicrous visual. The show didn’t establish Tor Lara’s history and significance and thus none of what went down there landed with the desired impact. 

    The Ciri in the desert sequence had its problems too, mainly the complete lack of establishment of Falka and her link to Ciri and her storyline. The whole breaking the wheel thing is still a fetch that’s never going to happen. Changing the sYsTeM, social justice and complete societal utopia aren’t what the Witcher is about, this isn’t the agenda of the novels you are trying to adapt, don’t put your cuckoo’s egg in a nest someone else built.

    This is a good point to mention that Ciri’s conversation with Geralt on the ship about how peace and equality could or should be forced on the Continent rings Anakin and Padmé at the Naboo picnic and related memes. We all realize how Anakin’s drive to bring peace, freedom and justice to his new empire worked out, right? So careful there.

    Redania, while the only kingdom that’s actually portrayed in any way (kudos for that), is kind of a hot mess. If you can just kill royals every week, what exactly keeps you (as in Philippa and/or Dijkstra and by proxy any other mage) from breaking that wheel the show seems to have made Ciri’s vision to break?  Philippa has no reason to put Radovid (as portrayed in the show) on the throne when he was juxtaposed as the one with a prowess next to Vizimir (poor guy) and thus as someone who wouldn’t likely be a puppet to Phillipa. And that’s the point where the snake bites its own tail for the second time.

    After Thanedd the mages don’t really do anything other than talk and talk and talk and talk. Yennefer is weak and useless, the shadow of her season 1 self. Anyway, she wasn’t the one to have it worst. Tissaia poor woman was turned inside out. She went from turning students into eels for a teachable moment to fond suicide notes with pet names and hugging and mothering Yennefer. I’m not sure why this motherliness in Yennefer and Tissaia was made a focal point of this season and why tough love died out in season 2. For one thing it makes Triss completely redundant and invalidates the two’s former characters. And here’s the ironic and probably unintended part about it: Yennefer and Tissaia both were unapologetically hard and commanding and willful and even unpleasant and brusque in season 1 and now they are nice and sweet and docile and remorseful. The arch in itself implies this as preferable to the hardass personalities they had in previous seasons. And since Geralt and Yennefer basically became happy co-parents and the show has the audacity to have a dialogue about how content and happy Tissaia is with Vilgefortz (not only write her into a relationship with him), what you are basically saying is - well, ladies, all it takes is getting laid, and look how good it is for you to finally have boyfriends! Is that really what you meant to say? I somehow doubt it. 

    So Geralt and Triss got to Brokilon - I don’t know how, if the show established it, it went over my head. And Milva was at some point introduced. Was she? I don’t know. After she kept firing arrows for no reason whatsoever I finally started picking up on the idea that she might be Milva. No clue why she went with Geralt and Jaskier. No clue why she was in Brokilon. Literally no background. And also  no clue why she’s wearing a Tiger Lily costume. 

    Nilfgaard… oh dear. The world building issues. I just wish Emhyr would take his sodding armor off. Aren’t you in the south? Aren’t you at home and not marching to battle? Why are you wearing armor? I have no idea where we left fake Ciri but it doesn’t matter anyway for all the show cares for continuity. Then there were these random people in turbans and robes who captured Ciri. Where are we? What place is this on this bloody continent? Why are they wearing that? Are they a faction? Are they local to the desert? Are they Nilfgaardian? How can you make so little sense? 

    So. If you expect me to follow a plot you need to establish, places, people, motivations and then be consistent. To be consistent, you need to do some world building. I need to be able to recognize places and factions from a single shot. The way they dress, the way their location looks, the way they talk, etc. All this kinda needs to align so it doesn’t look absolutely stupid (Like you know, Milva).   I also need to have at least a vague idea about the backstory of characters, factions, place, etc to understand their significance so your use of them in the story will achieve the desired impact. If you don’t do that, the universe will be empty, shallow and bland and if you don’t have an immersive universe, and you don’t have a strong plot, and you don’t have consistent (or incrementally and reasonably changing) characters, and you don’t even have Henry Cavill, what exactly are you offering to the audience?  

     

  3. 23 hours ago, williamjm said:

    I think to schoolchildren all teachers are automatically classified as 'old' regardless of whether they're in their mid-20s or coming up to retirement.

    I actually remember having “young teachers” who were great favorites with the kids because they were “young”, I think these were the 20 somethings, and early 30something men, anybody who had kids themselves counted as “old” :lol: 

    On 8/5/2023 at 11:43 AM, dog-days said:

    The monsoon problem was fixed. The hot water went off again a couple of days ago, with the lettings agency muttering about a new boiler. Not sure when/if that'll happen. The current one is ancient with the flue conveniently close to my bedroom window. Have applied for a new job, and will keep on applying for jobs, so I hope I won't be living here much longer. 

    Primary/elementary school teachers tend to be very nice people. I'm the offspring of two of them. 

    Not sure if I'd recognise the people I went to primary or secondary school with these days – it's been so long. 

    That sounds like an improvement, fingers crossed for a new boiler. Household troubles that are out of your control are such a pain. I still cringe to remember the gas cutoff in the house from last autumn *shudders*. 
     

    good for you, they must be amazing people! I have a special warm place in my heart for every teach I ever had. Even the ones I didn’t like as a kid. 

  4. On 7/22/2023 at 8:33 PM, dog-days said:

    It's been quiet here for almost a month since a problematic housemate left, having been served with a two-week eviction notice after smashing a neighbour's window with a hammer. 

    Now water is pouring through the kitchen ceiling after someone had a shower in the new bathroom that was finally installed at the start of June. This happened a couple of hours after the hot water was fixed; it had been off for the last five days. As a result, I am an expert in sponge baths, and have another skill to add to my LinkedIn profile. 

    I'm not really bothered about the ceiling...just grateful hammers don't seem to have been involved again. 

    Has this water situation improved at all since? :( 

     

    well well, would you know that going to the grocery store in your hometown at around 9am on a Saturday means running into every second elementary school teacher you had? I’ve got to say, these ladies are looking amazing. I want to be them when I’m…. Well I have no idea how old they are. I suppose at the tender age of 7-10 I didn’t really have a sense of what “old” meant because I remember them as being old when they taught me, but boy 20+ years later they are a little smaller, little grayer but pretty much the same? Really sweet people.
     

    During  this nostalgia week here I also saw at the grocery store: my old hair dresser’s mother and daughter who had the daughter’s baby with them, the lady who used to be the school receptionist and always smoked in her cubicle and later became a postwoman, the lady who used to run the library where I read nearly every YA and children’s book from the selection and donated all my YA and children’s books after the covid clean out. And one of the cashiers is the lady whose mom used to do housework for us when my mom had been ill, and whose daughter I used to take the bus to grammar school with. Oh and I walked past a woman in front of the store, whose sister used to be in my class and whose dad used to be the school janitor. Life is weird and beautiful. 

  5. 14 minutes ago, Zorral said:

    There is nothing about this show that isn't . . . baffling . . . 

    Is it sad that a show feels the need to explain what happened in the show, and seems to expect the viewers are going to be thrilled they are telling us what we didn't get?

    EXPLAINER
    ‘The Witcher’ Season 3 Ending Explainer: What Happens to Geralt?
    Who ended the season in grave danger?
    Who Is Falka? Freya Allan Explains Ciri’s ‘The Witcher’ Journey
    Who Is Emhyr? Explaining the Mysterious Emperor in ‘The Witcher’
    Etc.

    https://www.netflix.com/tudum/articles/witcher-season-3-ending-explainer?

     

    I mean the show is so bad I do need the explanation, I just stand no chance understanding their plot because they spend all the screen time on pretentious monologues instead of building a story…

    they did the same with game of thrones in the later seasons when the writing got to such lows and the scenes were so dark we literally couldn’t follow events… I don’t know, twenty years ago nobody needed aftershow episodes and explainopedia because watching an episode was enough to get it… in series with a tenth of the budget the Witcher had… 

    but what am I moaning about I have 2.5 episodes left, so the benefit of doubt is still kicking. 

  6. I finished Nightshade and it was quite well done. I still love this series and Horowitz certainly delivered something adult in this book that the previous installments lacked. It was open ended, so I’m hoping for more. Or even a segue to an adult Alex novel because the environment was established for it. Very clever work. I do recommend the entire series to any preteen, early teen who enjoys action/thriller/crime genres. Also the Diamond Brothers series which I also read as a preteen and absolutely loved, because they are so funny. 

  7. 11 hours ago, Heartofice said:

    Well I think the message is that people are not really very interested in these political talking points. Studios hid that from all the marketing and I doubt most people had any idea what the movie really was before going on.

    Talking to people who saw it already i think the poltics washed over them and they barely thought about it, they were there for the fun stuff 

    Yep, that’s why most people don’t understand why they keep pushing it, people watch movies for entertainment and the news/documentaries/etc for politics.  Oh the marketing is the worst kind of clickbait :lol: Not even close to the actual product. 

  8. 6 hours ago, Heartofice said:

    knew that conservatives are frothing at the mouth at the politics of this movie, but I've also seen some commentary that suggests they are missing the point and that the movie is in fact far cleverer than the surface level appears. It's hard to say for sure, so much of the messaging is incredibly straightforward and on the nose that there can be no doubt what it wants to say, but as a whole there are so many bits and pieces in there that seem confused and don't gel. So I can't tell whether there is a broader, clever message in there, or there was just a fuckup in the writing and the message is all messed up.

    this is an interesting one because lately we (well really just the media) like to hang on to this misguided and absurd notion that the reception of a movie is entirely dependent on political alignment. No, it’s not, let’s not underestimate the intelligence of the audience like that. I’m sure there’s a correlation because movies are more and more compulsively political. But sadly for the studios, it’s far from that simple. If you fail to build a clear and congruent narrative to get across your clear and congruent message in an adequately subtle and intelligent manner like Barbie failed to do so, your movie is lacking and people will notice it and that has nothing to do with anybody’s political alignment. 

  9. 2 hours ago, Ser Rodrigo Belmonte II said:

    Wash your Palette with Oppenheimer 

    I considered watching Oppenheimer last weekend until I saw it was 3 hours long. Plus it’s new, no telling if I like it, so no, the palette cleaning will happen with… and I want to be fair to Barbie and stay on theme, so Legally Blond or Uptown Girls. 

    Oh when I talked with my mom about the movie we moaned about one thing I wanted to mention. 
     

    Spoiler

    What have horses ever done to Greta Gerwig? 

    I never owned the real thing, only dupes as a kid, but I would have killed for the riding lessons Barbie set or the Barbie stables or the Horse Riding Barbie. I loved horses as much as Barbie, I had fake Barbie horses. My barbies rode their fake Barbie horses in hand sewn Amazon (the mythological warrior) outfits. And then this movie comes along and tells me horses are some nasty macho misogynistic thing and ignores the glorious existence of Horse Riding Barbie and Riding Lesson Instructor Barbie? 

     

  10. 1 hour ago, Veltigar said:

     

      Reveal hidden contents

    Since Ryan Gosling as Ken stole every scene he was in, does that mean that this film ends up promoting the Patriarchy? 

     

    Spoiler

    I don’t like Ryan Gosling in general and I preferred Margot Robbie’s Barbie in this movie as well, but the answer to the existential question is: yes, the movie did end up promoting a hierarchy based on inequality. To use an analogy that failed to work the same way Barbie’s themes did, they didn’t even attempt to “break the wheel”. 

     

  11. I went to see Barbie. I guess I got caught up in the PR way too much, because I went in with positive expectations and looking forward to a fun chick flick. I so desperately wanted to love this movie. I can genuinely tell you, I held out hope up until the very end. When they addressed how things shouldn’t be exactly as they were about 5 minutes before the end, I watched with my fingers crossed and heart rate elevated and waited for the movie to finally be the bigger “person” and fix itself. And it didn’t. I left the theater blue and disappointed. 

    Spoiler

    I loved the props, the costumes, the callbacks to historical barbie releases and models, the set, all the creative details in BarbieLand, I loved Margot Robbie’s performance, I liked the space odyssey Barbie legs (even though the rest of the opening scene was bordering on disturbing), I liked the real Barbara cameo, I liked America Ferrara’s character and Ruth’s character, I kinda liked the cartoon-Esau’s Mattel building chase, I loved Barbie’s malfunctions and I liked the overplayed weird Barbie. I really liked Barbie’s pink Birkenstocks in the end, the actual water in the glass that she spilled on herself, the plastic tie “handcuffs” in the Barbie box, and a ton of fun creative details. sadly that’s just the surface, plastic and fantastic. 

    underneath that, the story and themes are a hodgepodge, the dialogue is insufferable and this kind of “humor” just doesn’t do it for me. I don’t find it funny. I laughed like four times. I felt sad and hollow, like all the washing rubbed a hole into my brain. It was a painful disappointment. 

     

  12. I read printed books and listen to audiobooks too. Both serve different purposes and provide different experiences. Both are enriching and beautiful in their own way. I would encourage everybody to do both to enjoy the different benefits.

    Footnote: I think there’s nothing wrong with bringing up provocative topics and exchanging opposing ideas in a respectful and matter of fact way. It broadens one’s horizon, makes one think and reconsider their view and maybe find at least one new idea one hasn’t yet thought about. And I also think reading isn’t and shouldn’t be luxury. 

  13. Eventually I struggled through the first installment of season 3. With a couple of worthwhile highlights sprinkled on top, I found the first four episodes hot garbage.

    Then the fifth episode rolled around and it was delightful. Not perfect at all and not early game of thrones material, but certainly five times the quality of the first four episodes combined. You can smell the sweat on the cleverness of the episode, but at least that signals the effort and thought that went into writing actually cohesive dialogue, considering cause and effect, having a purpose and direction and using basic writing tools. Maybe I’m imagining it but I could also feel that the actors shined and enjoyed a script with some flow and an actual story to tell, as opposed to having to deliver empty lines that are so disconnected, directionless and fragmented they barely feel like a story. It had an atmosphere, it went from A to B and it was possible to make sense of how and why we landed at B. 

    The problem with the previous 4 episodes was the complete lack of understanding of the world, the terrible storytelling both in terms of plot, dialogue and character.

    Throwaway lines of names and places and weird words littered over a rice paper thin plot isn’t world building. As an audience member (one that even read the novels but kinda forgot them), my reaction is a momentary what/who the fcks that again followed by instantly forgetting the word. There are a myriad ways to do this while building characters and/or plot but of course you would have to think about it and work on it and spend twice the time in the writing room so that you have ample time to develop every aspect of the series without trade offs for one or the other. The result is a tiny, empty, lackluster universe in which no borrowed element from the novels work for either plot, or character (eg my ugly one, lilac and gooseberries, etc). 

    Characters are generally soft and lack gumption, the main characters lost themselves (well the writers rewrote them) and the supporting ones are tropes rather than anything else. Yennefer is Yen now. Just like that, because… well, you tell me. “Yen” used to be a thing in Yennfer’s story because Geralt called her that while Istredd called her Yenna. That was a thing between each duo and a source of jealousy and tension in the love triangle. But now Yennefer is generally Yen, to the council and to Ciri (rather than Madam Yennefer). I think I have said all there is to say about her. 
    The last time I have seen the semblance of light in Joey Batey’s face when playing Jaskier was back in season 1. The guy looks like he would rather be anywhere else in the world and there’s nothing but anguish in his eyes in any scene he’s put in. Which also says everything that needs to be said about Jaskier. 
    Henry Cavill is trying really hard to breathe life into the shell Geralt is with limited screen time and a small supporting role in the events of the story. And Ciri… ah it’s too exhausting. Let’s hope the second installment will remind her that it takes more than a childlike sense of justice and morality to make a good leader. Though tough love has pretty much evaporated from the series.

    The dialogue is for the most part painful to listen to and probably equally painful to deliver for the actors. The main cast is doing the best they can, most supporting characters fail to take their lines and characters seriously. Most of the dialogue says absolutely nothing, it’s just word salad out of context. 

    Overall it’s a 4/10 for me. 3ish scores for the first 4 episodes and a solid 7 for the 5th. I will watch the next installment because of Henry’s Geralt and then I’m out. And I don’t think I said anything that counts as spoiler but do correct me in case I did. 

  14. 9 hours ago, Zorral said:

    Wasn't he in Spartacus as somebody or other?  :dunno:

    One of the better known actors who were in Spartacus is Manu Bennett (who was in the Hobbit and that dreadful D list fantasy, Shannara chronicles), maybe you’re mixing him up with Henry Cavill? 

×
×
  • Create New...