Jô Maltese

Love is the enemy of Duty - the treason for love will be by Jon, it is known.

The silent consensus is that none of your theories is worth arguing for or against. They are usually based on your wishful thinking, usually obsolete (unproven years ago) and are never based on text evidence, but on confirmation biased demonstrations. And yes, I do mean to sound condescending.

The good news is that Jon may well end up with Val after all. “She would be worthy of a king”... Beyond the Wall.

So... Sansa and Tyrion end up ruling, although not exactly the way I saw it. And Jon is likely to be king as well... the King beyond the wall. I am actually ok with the conclusion of the series. Oh, and Jon's real name must be Aemon Targaryen.

Why would Bran ever need a Master of Whisperers???

Am I the only one who thinks that everything is pointing at Sansa and Tyrion to win it all ?

“3 fires you must light”, “the pale mare”... Some things do make sense!

Can't you see it's now written QUEEN SANSA WINS THE GAME OF THRONES?

Then ask the question directly to GRRM then. And I bet he doesn't know. Because it's irrelevant.

Ok, let's be crystal clear: your question is stupid. Move on. EDIT: On a second thought: no question is ever stupid. Please accept my apologies @mzso

@mzso, don't ask questions in this thread if you're not going to like the answers. Just start a new topic with your theory on "Tyrion and the poisons". And for the record, your question is irrelevant, because the QoT poisoned Joffrey, not Tyrion : the narrative does not require an answer.

^^ Fair enough, but again, then there was not point in having Tyrion stealing some more poison story wise...

Just from a narrative point of view, GRRM would have had Tyrion keep some poison instead of picking up mushrooms if he had meant that Tyrion stole more than the laxative?

He probably didn’t, otherwise he wouldn’t have taken Illyrio’s mushrooms?