Conflicting Thought

ok, you are delussional thats funny

and states that already have them? what are they? what is the usa to the rest of the world? i know that you dont care how the rest of the world views the usa, as long as you can do as you want, you can keep sending drones and keep killing women and children, and be happy about it. and the thing is that people like you are the reason why people should fight against US supremacy, you guys are fucking bloodthirsty, havent you got your fill allready? jesus

now thats an american! damn you guys and gals are brave people of action! who cares about long term, it has worked so well for you, maybe not so well for us people outside of the usa, but who fucking cares! drone that bitch away i say! weare the kids skulls as necklases and use them as ashtrays, fucking savages deserve it.

Yeah, that also caught my eyes, but decided to not say anything, glad to see someone call it out

Sure, i just think your questions are leading and not in good faith. Time and time again you do this and to tell you the truh im a little tiered of it. Like with the chomsky thing, as larry told you, chomski questioned and then came to the conclution that it was in fact a genocide. And i for sure dont think that whatever conclusion chomsky (or anyone else)got to, has something to do with anti colonialist thought going into some kind of dark path or some such nonsense

Cuz im not talking about what chomsky thinks or doesnt think on any particular subject

Thats just the reallity of the conflict, you can choose to cover your eyes and be a passive expectator of a genocide. You seem to be an a path of your own.

So are we aloud now to speak on the genocide taking place in gaza and the west bank?

Dont give a fuck. Actions taken by the usa goverment and military could and should be viewed as terrorist in nature

Now thats fucking funny

You might not belive it, but for many the usa soldiers ARE the terrorists, just ask the survivors of us drone bombings, and a long long list of simillar or worse "terrorists" attacks

i really didnt know where to put this article, it could be on the USA thread but, didnt want to keep deraling it, but it has to do wiht international news i think. https://mondoweiss.net/2024/02/extraordinary-charges-of-bias-emerge-against-nytimes-reporter-anat-schwartz/ https://theintercept.com/2024/02/28/new-york-times-anat-schwartz-october-7/ this is a better article but you can only read two of them if you are not subscribed, a workaround for this is to see the article in incognito

No, are all gazan civilians legitimate targets for violence in your opinion?

Sorry, i agree with you with you here, but, why is being radicalized bad in itself? I can think of many instanses where radicalization is good and necesary

Is being against the genocide of palestinians an extreme leftwing viewpoint?

what is? he send a mail to anarchist news websites, is that the major red flag? anarchism? jfc

maybe he wasnt depressed and he wasnt disturned or mentally ill, maybe he did what he did for what he said he did it for. he had very strong convictions and he did what he thought was best to further a just cause

No, your arguments aro so basic that its very funny (infuiriating, really) to say to kal that he enjoys losing, when you havent said one worthwhile thing on this topic, lying and just constructing a fantasy world for yourself. You should really think about your propossed tacticts to protest, online protesting is nothing, like you really are not informed, stealing kids and calling it adoptions does nothing but to further the ethnic cleansing. You ignore history and for what? Because your liberal sensitivities are hurt when someone is brave enough to sacrifice himself for something he belived in.

Its a protest, a very extreme form of protest, its not supposed to fix anything, its to get attention to a situation, and it is very effective at doing that. That goal was achieved.

Shouldnt be so comfortable saying that, its an effective way of getting attention, and speaks of the commitment of the person, im sure you have a problem in this case cuz you dont agree with what is being protested. But i mean you can look at thich quang duc and see that its not a dumb form of protest, wich, by the way, is a very dumb and insensitive thing to say.

In my experience there is allot of people that belive the things that karaddin in saying, they conflate big farma with pills that make you lethargic or submissive to the system, and these are left wing people, at leats in chile, conspiracies are just as common (if not more, cuz of distrust of mass media, and goverments, specially anything comming out of the USA), they are increasignly believing in "alternative" medicine

I think this video by rebbeca watson is pertinent to this discussion

think this video by rebbeca watson is very pertinent I

meh this is a typical anti communist argument, very lazy, very reductive. though the propaganda against communism is very strong as seen here, and i guess i agree that mentioning communism does garner anthipaty, but less with time, marxism and his work having a resurgence gives me hope. for the time being im happy with calling it socialism if that makes some liberals more accepting of change. edited to add a question; what ideas of communism do you think suck?

What is human nature?is it just one thing, has it always being the same? Is human nature just the "bad things" is greed the main component to human nature? I think capitalism feeds on greed and it nurtures it and awards greed, but thats the capitalist myth that everyone now belives, and uses as an argument for why you cant have communism or socialism or something other than capitalism.