Jump to content

IheartIheartTesla

Members
  • Posts

    3,561
  • Joined

  • Last visited

Posts posted by IheartIheartTesla

  1. No, its a mental one for me, but I always run through it before leaving the house and before checking out at a hotel.

    For non-Americans, everything else indeed can be purchased, but not prescription medication. There are some emergency vacation supplies you might be able to wrangle at the holiday destination, but I want never to be in that position.

  2. This is all very boring and jejune for a dating thread, but here goes anyway. I have a checklist for travel always, usually its meds, electronics (like chargers, very important), toiletries and clothing. 

    Everything else indeed is a want. For instance, protection and sex toys can and should be purchased on site. No need to give the fascist goons manning security any reason to stop you or judge you.

  3. Yes, and I think the statistics bear that out in that most successful relationships tend to be with partners in the same socioeconomic class. Also, in terms of preference its fairly common, which most people have internalized.

    Although I have to point out one of my favorite Onion headlines "Woman Relieved Soulmate Turned Out To Be In Same Socioeconomic Bracket"

  4. Funnily enough, Canada provided India with a nuclear reactor (CIRUS) that eventually generated enough plutonium for the latter's first nuclear test in 1974. Mostly without the knowledge of the former of course, but they had their suspicions. There are other nations using Canadian nuclear technology mostly for power production, I think safeguards were put in place to prevent use for other stuff.

    I grew up...about 2 miles from where the CIRUS reactor was.

  5. For those of you thinking the ballot measures will make Florida competitive, I just saw a recent Emerson College poll (and they are decent pollsters if I remember Silver's ratings from last cycle) that had Trump up +13 (1000 RV). Still early days, but my prognosis at this time is that Florida will flatter only to deceive come election day.

  6. The less you vote, the more you back Trump - ABC News (go.com)

    538 has a recent article about some of the things we've talked about here, namely the impact of turnout and frequency of voter participation in elections.

    Quote

    And when we broke out respondents by their voting history, we found dramatic differences in whom they support for president in 2024. President Joe Biden performed much better among frequent voters, while Trump had a large lead among people who haven't voted recently. Specifically, among respondents who voted in the 2018, 2020 and 2022 general elections, Biden outpaced Trump 50 percent to 39 percent. But among respondents who were old enough to vote but voted in none of those three elections, Trump crushed Biden 44 percent to 26 percent.

    Quote

    The fact that Trump did better among less frequent voters sheds light on another widely discussed trend: the declining levels of support for Democrats among Black and Hispanic Americans. Our NORC poll suggests that erosion is especially pronounced among less frequent voters. For instance, Biden led among Black respondents who voted in 2020 by 64 points, but he led among those who were registered but didn't vote by just 11 points. Biden's margin over Trump among Black citizens who don't appear to be registered to vote*** was also just 16 points. So it's not that Biden is uniformly underperforming with Black Americans — it's that he is underperforming specifically with Black citizens who don't consistently vote.

    Well, who knows what turnout will look like in November. But still, interesting to see how high turnout for minorities who infrequently vote will be.

  7. 1 hour ago, Ser Scot A Ellison said:

    The precence of an abortion rights question on the Florida Ballot has made the Presidential election in Florida that much more… interesting.  Trump is trying to split the baby.  

    The Arizona SC just upheld an 1864 law basically banning nearly all abortions, and I think there is a move there from pro-choice proponents to get a prop on the ballots in November. 

  8. In more poll news. hearing things about Biden's position improving in the swing states, possibly coinciding with post SoTU and general better feeling about the state of the economy. Good news, he has plenty of time to keep gaining momentum. Not so good news, everything is on a knife edge so any downturn in the economy will kill his chances.

  9. I've seen some opinion articles on my feed that Biden is slowly 'edging ahead' of Trump in the polls. I dont see it myself in the data (its pretty much statistically tied with Biden slightly worse in swing states). So I have to wonder if this is Democrats changing the algorithm through seeded articles to mitigate some of the doom and gloom permeating the left. 

    Another thing to watch out for is how many third parties actually make the ballots. The Libertarians and Greens are solid, but RFK may not be on that many states choices. He's the one I'm most worried about though.

  10. 15 hours ago, DMC said:

    In terms of demos, one thing I'll say I don't buy is the (comparatively) porous numbers Biden is getting among Black voters.  Again, I don't think the polls are "wrong" in this regard, it's just important to keep in mind polls are snapshots at a certain point in time.  I think push comes to shove, Black voters will come back to Biden come November.  

    That's what I think too, or at least I hope thats the truth. Biden needs those large Black turnout numbers in cities like Atlanta and Philly to stand a chance in those states. At the same time, ignoring troubling signs among some sections of Hispanic voters is what resulted in the Miami-Dade disaster, and I wouldnt want his team to ignore those signs. I hope some outreach is planned to the communities comprising members of his 2020 coalition.

  11. 538 wrote an article today about how polls in this stage didnt correlate all that well with general election results, but if was mostly unconvincing (not sure historical data from the 70s has much relevance in this cycle - we need in-cycle explanations). Still, the point they made about the Biden campaign publicly dissing polls was a good one, there is still time to turn this around as long as the problem is recognized. I hope the internal discussions are different.

    One thing that is concerning is two cycles now where Trump numbers were underestimated. Is that being overcorrected for this cycle? Hard to say, but the average of polls can still be biased because of some hidden variable. Or it could be the underestimation is true this cycle too, in which case ....Biden is in some trouble.

×
×
  • Create New...