StepStark

Actually you're lying right now because I didn't say that Lovely Lyanna is pathetic but that congratulating yourself in anonymous threads is pathetic. There is difference between criticizing someone's actions and insulting someone ad hominem. I did the former and you did the later.

Yes father. Sorry for disturbing your D&D fanboyism. It was my intention but now when I see how disturbed you actually are I really feel sorry. Don't worry, I'll go back to my reservation and leave the rest of internet to you. It's only fair, right?

Congratulating yourself for saying something anonymously on internet is definitely pathetic. "There! I have said it!" Well good for you but it doesn't mean that what you said make any sense. And to be honestly it doesn't. As first, the book maybe was boring to you which is probably logical if you think that the show is good, but to say that characters are doing nothing is ridiculous. The way you show lovers keep parroting that as fact it really doesn't mean there is any truth in that. Now AFFC is possibly weaker then other four books because some important characters and arcs were missing but it still very good book on its own. Lot happens in Cersei's chapters and Jaime's too and also in Ironborn chapters that are brilliant. I also liked Brienne's chapters but even if you didn't I don't see how can you say that they are repetitive. Please tell me what is repetitive about them. It looks likes one of those things that people keep repeating without thinking what it actually means. Dorne is obviously set-up for what is to come in next books so I didn't have problem with that either. And Sansa's chapters are also set-up and by the way far more logical then the nonsense that we're watching in the show. And please tell me do you think that nothing happens in Arya's chapters too. You can dislike book, that is fine and your right of course, but to say that nothing happens or that there was no plot progression that is simply ridiculous because its inaccurate. And one more thing: what D&D left out from AFFC is maybe better than what they left in. As many suggested it was much better to leave Arianne and cut Sand Snakes for example. And also Tywin's death was enormous event in that book but in the show they were done with it in no time. Also Kettleblacks and Cersei's plots with them are much more interesting than her verbal sparing with Margaery or Ollivar the mail whore. And so on.

Or Brienne because her story makes so much more sense in the show than in the books! And her dialogues with Pod! And his sexual power! What writing!

But what is your point than? That Martin is guilty because he didn't finish story in fifth book of the series that is planned to have seven books? Can you please explain me that logic than?

Are you serious? You're saying that man who ended War of the Five Kings with Red Wedding is bad at concluding stories? Can we be not infantile please? As first, what you're saying is not bad writing. If you were right it would be bad structuring. But luckily you are not right at all. There is nothing repetitive in Brienne chapters for example. Please find me one repetitive motif in those chapters. As second Cersei is really not cartoonishly incompetent for no good reason. There is very good reason for her incompetence and that is that she never was competent at all and she is obsessed with being equal to Jaime but I guess you missed that too. As third Jaime's adventures don't amount to anything simply because his storyline is still not finished. But his AFFC chapters in Riverlands are thematically rich but to tell you the truth I just wrote about that yesterday in some thread and I'm sick of repeating that. Just because you didn't understand about what are those chapters it doesn't mean there is nothing of important in those chapters. But anyway have fun watching this stupid show if you like it that much.

How can book purist be offensive? How can sane person not be book purist after this crap on screen?

I forgot: it is not editor who pushed climaxes for TWOW but publisher. Editor's job is something else.

Please teach me: what is poorly written in AFFC? No no, even better: what is very poorly written? Please?

Don't you love it when show apologists come and say that the books are poorly written? LOL that is priceless. This show is one of the poorest written shows in recent memory and its embarrassing as far as writing goes. On the other side someone may dislike the books but to say that they are written poorly is ridiculous. Nothing in the books doesn't come even close to crap from the show in terms of poor writing.

It is unbelievable that reading person can think like this. Doing absolutely nothing? Really? Congratulation on missing everything from the book that you say that you read. By the way, Martin's editor is doing a much better job than you would because at least Martin's editor looks like able to understand what she reads.

You're priceless, did you know that? Issue is changing for no reason but you obviously don't have enough will to address that issue. So go on, play your stupid games some more and pretend that it's about changes required by adaptation.

Oops I didn't saw tat you changed your post. Well it looks like I have to repeat: if someone is changing things just for the sake of changing then he definitely doesn't have respect for the source material. That is like basic logic. I think that even you should understand that. And yes, GRRM made mistake by trusting D&D, but I don't know how does that help your "argument" because he made that mistake before he could see how disrespectful they actually are.

Your arguments are too mute, really! Mute! My nephew says hello by the way.

Thanks for this contribution! I didn't even notice how ridiculous he is. And he complains about my grammar? LOL!

Thanks but I advise you not to waste your time on arguing with this guy because he's so blinded and shallow it is unheard of. And he proves that again in his reply to you LOL. I'm like stuck here with him because he keeps replying to me with his nonsensical "arguments" but you don't have to suffer.

Mate you should read again how all this started. It is you who look like he came out of Monty Python sketch. It is you who confuse contradiction with arguments. Just read this thread again and you'll see. Oh and this is fact not opinion!

Well actually I don't because I don't have any kind of crush on works of art. However it is much worse that you have serious crush on D&D's nonsense. Referring to Martin won't hide your crush LOL.

If you think GRRM is closer to Rowling than to Shakespeare then it is impossible to take your opinion seriously. It is you who is fundamentalist in his poor attempt at relativism like "it is just opinion" but then even stranger you state something like "GRRM is not even close to Shakespeare and he's closer to Rowling" as if that is some kind of fact. Let me tell you it is not fact but your opinion which is as ridiculous as one would expect from someone who doesn't see any difference between show and books. For your information before you brought them up I wasn't even talking about books but I was just saying the show is stupid. It is you who are constantly bringing the books instead of answering to all those stupidities in the show. You can go on thinking whatever you like but from your so called "arguments" it is clear you are not fit to judge anything and let alone Shakespeare and Martin. I doubt you're even fit to see Rowling for who she. But it's all just opinions anyway right? LOL!

You are not D&D fanboy for liking the show, you are their fanboy because you're arguing with me without bringing anything into discussion other than pure fanboyism and some abstract absurdity like "Shakespeare is not really better than Rowling it is just opinion and not facts".

I'm happy to leave all dolls to you D&D fanboys. I have my books and you have your dolls. And everyone's happy.

You're getting better and better with every post mate. As first, by your logic nothing should ever be compared right? Because there is no quantifiable way to prove that Shakespeare is better than Rowling right? LOL! Man if you think opinions can only be validated with something that is quantifiable then you are in much bigger problem than I thought. For your information if something is quantifiable proven then it is not opinion any more but fact. Opinion is something else entirely. You'll learn as you grow up I guess. As second, it really isn't about control LOL but as someone already said it is like watching trainwreck because it is in human nature to keep eyes on it. But don't worry D&D are doing great job in making me stop. As third you are delusional if you think HBO owns Martin's world. I can see why someone like you who obviously doesn't belong among ASOIAF readers could think like that but for us who are able to comprehend what we read it is clear that Martin's is still in charge of his world. HBO bought rights to make the show out of it and they made the show that happens to be ridiculous and that's it. As Martin himself said they can't mess with his books so I will always have books to read and cleanse my brain from the stupidity of the show. But don't worry I get what you are saying, that is what you D&D fanboys always say: it is not Martin's world any more, it is the show world and it should be looked as the separate entity. Well it is more and more true with every episode and that is why I won't stay with the show for long.

I watch it just because of the source material. It is the same as Elio and Linda said in their last video when they said that it is still Martin's world and therefore it is hard to resist. But don't worry I will stop soon because the show is so ridiculous it is unbelievable. But you didn't answer my question about opinions and facts. What does it mean to pass opinions as facts? You keep repeating that but it doesn't mean anything as far as I can see. Oh and by the way I'm not confusing anything. I just clearly see that you are blind for D&D's stupidity but that is nothing new with you fanboys. Just because your "opinions" doesn't have any reason and logic in them it doesn't mean the rest of us should also get rid of reason and logic LOL.

Oh boy this is brilliant. Yeah neither is perfect but what matters is that one is brilliant and other is ridiculous. And please don't think your crusade against opinions do you any good. As first I don't even know what does it mean that I state opinions as facts. As second, I don't care to who my opinions mean, all I care is that my opinions are logical and I'm afraid that is something you can't say for your "opinions".

Well English is my second language so if that is your best shot then fine. Now about reason he is much better than D&D and their fanboys which is most important here I suppose.