Cold Crashing Waves Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 Aside from the obvious Meereen relation, Breaker of Chains refers to.. - The Hound breaking Arya's moral 'chains' - Tywin breaking Cersei's chains to Tommen - Tyrion breaking his chains to Podrick, and to a degree, Bronn Anything else? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
ejhawman Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 LF breaking the chains holding Sansa to KL. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Kinkslayer Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 Ser Piggy dumping his ball and chain in Mole's town Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kevoncox Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 Necklace is a type of chain... LF broke that chain. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ilúvatar Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 Jaime broke the chains of sexual frustration. Tywin broke a human chain in order to speak to Oberyn. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onna Lewyys Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 Grenn said they were in chains at Craster's. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonCon's Red Beard Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 Tywin broke a human chain in order to speak to Oberyn. :lol: Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waylin Stark Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 You're all reaching.Unlike some episodes where the episode title has multiple meanings, this one only referred to Dany for being a slave liberator. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Arya Targaryen Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 You're all reaching. Unlike some episodes where the episode title has multiple meanings, this one only referred to Dany for being a slave liberator.For me the Grenn and Edd "chain-breaking" was the other (obvious) meaning. Like, I immediately thought that they needed them in chains only because it will match the ep. title. (it would be OOC from the other Watchmen to put them in chains instead of killing them on the spot) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Desmond Wine's Bane Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 You're all reaching. Unlike some episodes where the episode title has multiple meanings, this one only referred to Dany for being a slave liberator. You're reaching This one clearly referenced Sansa because Dany broke no chains this episode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Waylin Stark Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 You're reaching This one clearly referenced Sansa because Dany broke no chains this episode. Okay, it may have referred to Sansa and Dolorous Edd and Grenn, but it definitely referenced Dany primarily. Not for breaking any chains in this episode, but for having done so before. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cold Crashing Waves Posted April 21, 2014 Author Share Posted April 21, 2014 It's not reaching. A major theme of the episode was breaking away... From a person, a place, or an idea. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Desmond Wine's Bane Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 Okay, it may have referred to Sansa and Dolorous Edd and Grenn, but it definitely referenced Dany primarily. Not for breaking any chains in this episode, but for having done so before. I know it was referencing Dany. I was just refuting your absolutist claim. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
jons nissa Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 You're all reaching. Unlike some episodes where the episode title has multiple meanings, this one only referred to Dany for being a slave liberator. i really disagree with this. there are a lot of literal and metaphorical breaking of chains in this episode. it's a great name for the episode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
AzorAhai42 Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 Some others in this thread mentioned it too, but other than Dany (the main and obvious reason for the episode name), I think the only other obvious meaning of the episode title was Grenn and Ed breaking their chains at Craster's Keep. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GHOSTSTARK Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 didnt think of it like that, just thought of Dany at the end. but all the ones i read above are great. didnt even think about Grenn and Edd being chained up and Jaime breaking that sexual tension hes had building up since hes gotten back. also Sansa breaking her crain from KL and Tyrion and Pod Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
WinterisAlwaysComing Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 Cersei +Hound +Arya +Ian White +Natalie Dormer += CHAIN Bingo. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Duckfield Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 I'm pretty sure that the boy who survived the massacre at the village is the one who'll kill Ygritte when they get to Castle Black Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Onna Lewyys Posted April 21, 2014 Share Posted April 21, 2014 For me the Grenn and Edd "chain-breaking" was the other (obvious) meaning. Like, I immediately thought that they needed them in chains only because it will match the ep. title. (it would be OOC from the other Watchmen to put them in chains instead of killing them on the spot)I know, right. Why would Karl & co. keep them in chains? And then how the hell did they escape? But I suppose they had to put something in to explain how Sam, Gilly & a freaking baby got back to the Wall so much sooner than they did. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.