Happy Ent Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Bakker XXXIII: The Thing Called A ThreadBakker XXXIII: That which precedes everythingBakker XXXIII: Love is lust made meaningfulBakker XXXIII: Love is for lesser soulsBakker XXXIII: The truth of nothingBakker XXXIII: Truth shines Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hello World Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 When one thread dies one must learn to love another Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Drizztos Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Bakker XXXIII: The Thing Called A Thread Bakker XXXIII: That which precedes everything Bakker XXXIII: Love is lust made meaningful Bakker XXXIII: Love is for lesser souls Bakker XXXIII: The truth of nothing Bakker XXXIII: Truth shines Bakker XXXIII: The Thread for Lovers Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
SilentRoamer Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 The Thread of Many Thoughts - ties in nicely with the new short :) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andrew Gilfellon Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 The unholy thread?The thread of black semen Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Ent Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 When one thread dies one must learn to love another I vote for that. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sologdin Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 this discussion is derailing the thread. y'all need a separate thread dedicated to RSB thread-naming. because four active RSB threads on the front page is not enough. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Madness Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 Maybe my thread title isn't actually optional :P. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hello World Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 I vote for that. I second this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hello World Posted January 28, 2015 Share Posted January 28, 2015 I'd asked him over the summer if he might consider joining us for an episode (at that point we'd literally done TSACast #1). He didn't say no but he also didn't respond affirmatively. I think our best bet is to keep legitimizing the Cast by participating in more regular content-creation Such conceit! Have you tried offering him a gold coin? What better way to legitimize it than by having the author appear? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Callan S. Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Bakker XXXIII: The self naming thread Bakker XXXIII: [To Be Determinism] Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hello World Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Maybe this is the thread where the title should be discussed and the we can have another proper Bakker thread? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gasp of Many Reeds Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 The Space Between the Threads. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gasp of Many Reeds Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 From the New Bakker Story Thread: That was some time ago though, so we don't know that that hasn't been pushed into TSTSNBN. I assume Eänna will play some role in the future of the series, but mainly in the sense that that Xiuhianni, like the rest of humanity, pose a problem if the Consult want to solve the 144,000 problem. I therefore assume the Consult have in some way been active in Eänna, but I think if they'd exterminated the Xiuhianni there we'd have heard about it, so I assume they've made use of them or that they are not numerous enough to be useful. It's possible there ruled by the consult and will pour over the mountains like Shara in WoT. It’s better to have this discussion in the regular thread. Any further thoughts? I think Darzin is right and Eanna may well play the role of a Chekhov's Continent a lá Shara in WoT. I also wanted to make an enquiry regarding Chorae. I noted that Plato refers to the khora (originally referring to the territory of a Greek polis outside the city proper) as being spaces enfolded between being and non-being which act as receptacles for the Forms. If Bakker's chorae references Plato's khora, can we think of the chorae as being receptacles for the objective (i.e. the God), which 'correct' any woundings to the onta in their vicinity (so the salting of sorcerors is really a healing of their Mark). http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Kh%C3%B4ra Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Ent Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Great find! I didn’t know that. […] a way of evading the allegedly phallocentric character of symbolic activity (signification through language),[…] You can’t make that up. If this appears in Derrida, Lacan, and Heidegger then Bakker is sure to know this. So is solo? Have I just not been paying attention? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Ent Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 Bakker XXXIII: the phallocentric character of symbolic activity Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hello World Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 “Bakker XXXIII: Neither present nor absent, active or passive, good nor evil, living nor nonliving - but rather atheological and nonhuman” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
sologdin Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 nifty. if chorae evade the phallogocentric character of signification, that explains why they bust up sorcery and why mimi turns them into preggerbombs. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Borque Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 On another note, just noticed that "sologdin" is an anagram of "No-God Sil". Coincidence? Ha. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happy Ent Posted January 29, 2015 Share Posted January 29, 2015 This can be turned into a perfectly Ximenean cryptic clue! No-God with Sil excited denizen of Westeros. (8) Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.