Jump to content

Small Questions v. 10097


Rhaenys_Targaryen

Recommended Posts

Yandel claims that Aerys II after Battle of the Trident, disinherited Rhaegar's children as he belived that prince Lewyn betrayed him

But that's only Yandel's point of view and actually we don't know the truth...

Why wouldn't we believe Yandel?
Link to comment
Share on other sites

The book is written for Robert.

Also, Yandel wasn't there and Pycelle ( as a Lannister supporter ) isn't 100% belivable.

So Pycelle lies? What good would that do? Saying that Aegon, who wasnt heir, died a gruesome death.. while it wasn't necessary, because he wasn't heir...?

Why say such a thing unless Viserys was actually named heir?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So Pycelle lies? What good would that do? Saying that Aegon, who wasnt heir, died a gruesome death.. while it wasn't necessary, because he wasn't heir...?

Why say such a thing unless Viserys was actually named heir?

I wasn't talking exactly about this case, but more about the whole Yandel's testimony. I will never belive 100% in book that is dedicated to Tommen Lannister ;)

There are parts of TWOIAF that are truth mixed with lies to show Lannister - Baratheon as the best.

( Aerys' reign, Targaryens as bunch of madmen and idiots, wealth of Lannisters praised even in Asshai, sack of King's Landing, Aerys' ordering Rhaenys and Aegon killed)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...