Jump to content

Why did Rhaella crown Viserys?


Recommended Posts

I saw it mentioned that Rhaella crowned Viserys as soon as she received word that Rhaegar had died. I'm having some trouble understanding why.



I fully understand why Aerys would want to name Viserys his heir, of course. Aerys was deeply suspicious of Rhaegar and hated Elia and her kids who he considered filthy halfbreeds. But Rhaella? She should have hated Aerys. She never liked him, according to Barristan. Furthermore, he raped and abused her, and called her a whore in front of court. Why would she be loyal to Aerys' wishes rather than the wishes of her son the Crown Prince and the rules of succession? Was it because Viserys was older than Aegon?



What if the rebellion had turned out differently, and all of the Targaryens had survived except Aerys and Rhaegar. Would Rhaella still support Viserys as king over Aegon?



Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhaella only crowned Viserys after Aerys' death which happened to coincide with Aegon's (presumed) death. But more importantly, he was her son, too, and with her on Dragonstone. Even if Aegon had survived there is no reason to assume that she would have preferred her grandson over her son, especially with Aerys already naming Viserys his heir.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

I saw it mentioned that Rhaella crowned Viserys as soon as she received word that Rhaegar had died. I'm having some trouble understanding why.

I fully understand why Aerys would want to name Viserys his heir, of course. Aerys was deeply suspicious of Rhaegar and hated Elia and her kids who he considered filthy halfbreeds. But Rhaella? She should have hated Aerys. She never liked him, according to Barristan. Furthermore, he raped and abused her, and called her a whore in front of court. Why would she be loyal to Aerys' wishes rather than the wishes of her son the Crown Prince and the rules of succession? Was it because Viserys was older than Aegon?

What if the rebellion had turned out differently, and all of the Targaryens had survived except Aerys and Rhaegar. Would Rhaella still support Viserys as king over Aegon?

probably.

Rhaella had a very close relationship with viserys.

it is said that Rhaella would do her at most to shelter viserys from aerys madness.

and another thing to look at is the fact that dany has stated "when viserys sold his mother's crown all joy had left him".

no you have to ask your self why did it leave him?

viserys had been begging, insulted and disrespected his entire life.

why would selling a golden trinket for money be the thing to make him snap?

unless you look at it for a different angle,

that the reason it made viserys go mad was not because it he had to sink so low.

but because that crown was the last remnant of his dead mother.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Rhaella only crowned Viserys after Aerys' death which happened to coincide with Aegon's (presumed) death. But more importantly, he was her son, too, and with her on Dragonstone. Even if Aegon had survived there is no reason to assume that she would have preferred her grandson over her son, especially with Aerys already naming Viserys his heir.

Hm, I thought I read that Rhaella crowned Viserys after Rhaegar died, not after Aerys/Aegon died. I don't have a source, however.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I always thought Rhaella crowned Viserys shortly before her death in childbirth and before Jon Darry was forced to flee with the children. Even if she hated Aerys, for her to crown Viserys before the current king dies makes no sense nor would it be recognized as anything by anyone. That holds true, even if the principle heir predeceased the king. That said, even if she was the type to throw over Aegon in favor of Viserys, which I don't personally buy, Aerys and Aegon died so closely together, so, in theory, she would only have Viserys to crown anyway.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I thought that she had named Viserys heir before Aegon was dead. Guess I was wrong?

Aerys named Viserys heir after Rhaegars death. Rhaella and Viserys were send to Dragonstone after news of Rhaegars death reached KL, and on Dragonstone, they would learn of the Sack, and the deaths of Aerys and supposedly Aegon. We don't exactly how much time passed after learning that news until Rhaella crowned him, IIRC, but it wasn't long (see quote in post below). As far as she was aware, Viserys was the last male Targaryen left, and the loyalists, would they still be willing to fight, would need someone to fight for.
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well, that explains it. Don't suppose you could provide the quote or at least a little context? She probably wouldn't have known about the pisswater prince switcheroo anyway.

I have it in my notes:

Following the Sack of King's Landing and the deaths of Aerys, Princess Elia Martell, and the presumed deaths of Rhaegar's children Aegon and Rhaenys, Viserys was declared king on Dragonstone. Nine turns of the moon later, however, the royal fleet was smashed in a storm, and at the same time Rhaella died while giving birth to Daenerys Targaryen, who was known thereafter as Daenerys Stormborn.

Thus, also shows it happened quite fast after Aerys' death.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I have it in my notes:

Following the Sack of King's Landing and the deaths of Aerys, Princess Elia Martell, and the presumed deaths of Rhaegar's children Aegon and Rhaenys, Viserys was declared king on Dragonstone. Nine turns of the moon later, however, the royal fleet was smashed in a storm, and at the same time Rhaella died while giving birth to Daenerys Targaryen, who was known thereafter as Daenerys Stormborn.

Thus, also shows it happened quite fast after Aerys' death.

The king is dead. Long live the king!
Link to comment
Share on other sites

For a queen who must have been shrewd and self-aware enough to survive a husband like Aerys, I am somewhat baffled by Rhaella's rashness in crowning Viserys on Dragonstone so soon after the Sack. Doing that was basically a siren drawing attention to her family when they were at their most vulnerable. A better move would have been to leave Dragonstone with Viserys and loyal retainers as soon as possible, then going to Braavos, Pentos, or Volantis and setting up a court-in-exile where she could give birth to Daenerys safely, get in contact with sellswords, and plan against the Baratheons as far away from King's Landing as possible. Or, hide innocuously in the Free Cities and renounce the Iron Throne completely, buying her children life.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Dragonstone was essentially pretty much impregnable until the storm completely destroyed the Targaryen fleet. There was no reason for Rhaella to abandon the ancient stronghold of her family. And we don't really know how much time passed between Dany's birth and Stannis' arrival/Darry's escape with the children.


Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...