Jump to content

What does the title mean?(Possible Spoilers)


IsleOfFaces

Recommended Posts

The Nights King was also supposedly an Oathbreaker, betrayed the Watch over an Other woman. This could also relate to Jon, betraying the Watch over the Wildlings.

Jamie is the no 1 Oathbreaker. Bran will have to have a Jamie flashback at some stage - travel to that window he was pushed out of and discover who took away his ability to walk. I think this will be the turning point at which Bran goes over to some kind of dark side, vowing to destroy the Lannisters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was just reading the description of Episode 4, which I won't talk about here. But there is a detail in it that, when combined with the title of Episode 3 "Oathbreaker", makes me think the title is referring to Jamie Lannister. I have a feeling the High Sparrow and the Faith Militant will try to arrest Jamie Lannister for the "crimes/sins" he confessed to the High Sparrow last week. Whether they succeed or not, I don't know. Or I could be completely wrong and nothing of the sort happens.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/4/2016 at 4:41 PM, Lady Snowsand said:

Yes, but we are getting the ToJ, so if R+L=J is confirmed, there also has to be a scene or dialogue about how Ned decides to break his honor and oath to always be true to his wife.

I agree with this. Not that Ned will break his vow but he will make the world think that he has to protect his nephew. 

Bringing Rickon and the Umbers in now would be odd as there has been little of them for several seasons now but it does make sense in a way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi everyone, first-time poster here (I've been trying to get onto the forum for 2 weeks now, it only just let me in ha ha!)

 

For me, whilst the episode titles can be ambiguous, what immediately jumped out at me was Brienne, who until now has always behaved with nauseatingly impeccable integrity.  I would love the plot to go something like this: Jaime heads to the Riverlands to arbitrate between the Freys and Tullys to lift the siege. Brienne escorts Sansa to join her only known surviving relatives, her mother's family. An actual book-plot will be introduced, Brienne being accosted by the BWBs and brought to ..... LSH. LSH will order her to kill Jaime, hence 'Oathbreaker'.

Good or not? :ph34r:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I doubt Brienne would take Sansa anywhere near the Lannisters. I would assume Riverrun was under siege since the Red Wedding so Brienne would have heard about it before heading north. I would say Sansa get dropped off at a friendly house like the Mormonts, maybe via Jon. Now i will agree that Brienne will head to the Riverlands. The preview for the episode show her tell Sansa about Arya so one could assume Sansa sends her on a mission to find her sister.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, House Cambodia said:

Do you think Brienne would separate from Sansa having just united with her and pledged to be the shield to her back? I don't see that.

That does seem unlikely, but doesn't Sansa have to stay up north and reunite with Jon while Brienne has to go south to reunite with Jaime?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CrypticWeirwood said:

That does seem unlikely, but doesn't Sansa have to stay up north and reunite with Jon while Brienne has to go south to reunite with Jaime?

Brienne, Sansa and theon all heading off in different directions? Seems implausible to me but to D&D? Well, we'll find out in a few hours!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think Brienne will ever leave Sana's side again. Not unless Sansa commands her to. And I can't see her doing that any time within the next few episodes, not until she meets up with Jon and they decide to make their way to Winterfell. Then she may send Brienne and Pod as an envoy to the Riverlands, where she could then be reunited with Jamie and/or the BWB. This may be where we see pictures of Pod possibly being kidnapped. I am still leaning toward thinking the show will not introduce us to lady Stoneheart.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The showrunners like to choose titles can be applied to multiple elements in that episode.

Clearly when Ned tells the Kingsguard that their brother Jaime slew Aerys, that makes Jaime an oathbreaker.

The mutineers are oathbreakers.

There should be two or three other candidates here.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
5 minutes ago, GuusofhouseStark said:

Could it be that Gilly is pregnant and thats why she called Sam the father of her son which references to the title by him breaking his oath when he slept with Gilly and fathering her children?

I like that!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...