GAROVORKIN Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 He was in favor single payer Healthcare system and higher taxes and free college education for everyone. On the issue of immigration it seems unlikely that he would have taken a similar approach to Trump. What do you think an America under Berne Sanders would be like? How would he do on jobs creation and economics? What would his foreign policy be like ? Who would be the biggest winners and losers in America under a Sander Presidency? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Seli Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Nothing would be happening, GOP would still control congress and many states. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Arryn Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 9 minutes ago, Seli said: Nothing would be happening. That has never sounded as appealing as it does now. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowleper Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 I think a Sanders presidency would have been interesting. Even if very little happened congressionally, I'm certain Sanders would have been very good at using the office to bring his appeals directly to the American people in a palatable and coherent manner. Which I think would have resonated a lot better with a broader demographic than the current administration's self-promotional incoherency is. 1 hour ago, Leap said: I suppose you could make the argument that the (theoretical) swing left in a Post-Trump world is preferable to a Sanders presidency immobilised by a Republican led Congress. I'm glad that we've established that losing is in many ways somehow preferable to winning. Unless of course - winning is preferable. With a theoretical swing left with a sanders win, followed by a slow dip left via a sanders presidency. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Week Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 It would be totally dope bro. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Tiger Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 I always thought that Bernie Sanders would just be Jimmy Carter 2.0, only with better speaking skills. 4 hours ago, James Arryn said: That has never sounded as appealing as it does now. Basically this. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowleper Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 I think it is cynical to overstate the partisan opportunities of the trump presidency. And particularly naïve when there is more than a good chance that these opportunities might not even pan out. Personally -- I just can't swallow the initial statement I quoted, that a trump presidency could theoretically in any way or form be seen as preferable to a Sanders presidency. This is very different from saying that there are now opportunities open to us that are in some ways beneficial. That's not a hard argument to make. But instead the argument seems to be that a loss now might be better with a chance of a slightly bigger win in 2-4 years. I really just don't like that new milepost. It frames a loss as a pseudo-win via potential electoral lottery. And I'm not the sort who even buys scratch-its. I'm fairly certain we are in near complete agreement here. And I know that you are framing this in very speculative terms. But it still leaves a very bad taste in my mouth, and I'm not really willing to forgive you for it unless you first buy me a beer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowleper Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Yeah, I think it's optimistic to think that we might get much of anything without at the same time taking too much damage. But I think it is cynical if after all the damage is done -- all we have to show for it is a slightly better electoral victory, or a house and senate that is slightly more even than it currently is. Even if we get everything you said -- but at the cost of thousands of human lives (possibly through the engineered failure of obamacare), are we really ready to call that a victory? Much less if millions die via American interventionism in Venezuela or north Korea (or the continued occupation of the middle east). Hell. Would you say that the Bush administration was worth it since we got Obama afterwards? (I'd assume not). It's fair to say that opportunities exist, or that there is a silver lining somewhere in all of this. But if we look at it as cost vs. benefit -- it's hard for me to see enough benefit to cancel out all the likely awful we're headed for... So yeah - I'll take any beer you give me. The world is too grim not to enjoy the momentary respite of friendly company. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Larry of the Lawn Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 Who is bernie sanders? The chicken guy? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Marquis de Leech Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 6 hours ago, Red Tiger said: I always thought that Bernie Sanders would just be Jimmy Carter 2.0, only with better speaking skills. Except that Jimmy belonged to the centrist wing of the party (in some respects, foreshadowing Reagan-era deregulation). Bernie's a different kettle of fish. Anyway, to answer the question, nothing would be happening, due to congressional obstructionism. The one vital exception though - court appointments. That was why 2016 was so critical. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
denstorebog Posted August 13, 2017 Share Posted August 13, 2017 I can't tell you what the world would look like today if Sanders had one. But I do know one thing for certain. Trump would be holding rallies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
snowleper Posted August 14, 2017 Share Posted August 14, 2017 32 minutes ago, denstorebog said: I can't tell you what the world would look like today if Sanders had one. But I do know one thing for certain. Trump would be holding rallies. He would be selling trump jerky while he pushed for an apprentice reboot. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Red Tiger Posted August 14, 2017 Share Posted August 14, 2017 1 hour ago, Roose Boltons Pet Leech said: Except that Jimmy belonged to the centrist wing of the party (in some respects, foreshadowing Reagan-era deregulation). Bernie's a different kettle of fish. Doesn't matter. My point was that Bernie seemed like a guy who woudln't have gotten much done while in office. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
GAROVORKIN Posted August 14, 2017 Author Share Posted August 14, 2017 14 minutes ago, Red Tiger said: Doesn't matter. My point was that Bernie seemed like a guy who woudln't have gotten much done while in office. There would have been some serious opposition to him lead by the Conservative wing the Republican party and there is the possibility that conservative Democrats would not have been on board with him either. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Impmk2 Posted August 14, 2017 Share Posted August 14, 2017 1 hour ago, Roose Boltons Pet Leech said: Anyway, to answer the question, nothing would be happening, due to congressional obstructionism. The one vital exception though - court appointments. That was why 2016 was so critical. The nothing would also include not defunding the EPA and state department. And the US wouldn't be set to pull out of Paris. And then repubs would just be back to pushing through pointless Obamacare repeals with the cover of the veto. It'd look pretty similar to a Clinton presidency on the domestic front imo. Foreign policy would probably be more isolationist than Trump (or a hypothetical Clinton admin). No bombing Syria. Less sabre rattling with North Korea. Probably still would've pulled out of the TPP. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.