Prince Yourwetdream Aeryn Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 After Targaryen conquest, Tyrells and Baratheons managed to rule their kingdoms but Tullys didn't. Tullys conspired against Iron Throne for two times and the last one caused their downfall. Apparently Littlefinger doesn't have wish to rule Riverlands and Emmon Frey isn't a man to be trusted. Should Lord of the Crossing rule Riverlands or this kingdom should be abolished and given to Greyjoys (if they sworn allegiance)? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Universal Sword Donor Posted August 22, 2017 Share Posted August 22, 2017 No Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apoplexy Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 Not an Ironborn fan, so I would hope not. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
averde Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 Emmon is married to a strong Lannister woman from the main branch of the Lannister family, making the riverland rulers a Lannister/ riverland combination. It's acceptable to the people of the riverlands and binds the region to the crown and the westerlands. By far a wise decision for the current Baratheon-Lannister rulers of kings landing. Beyond that, Edmure Tully is the rightful lord, and seemed to be if nothing else in touch with and caring of his people. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graydon Hicks Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 i would ahve to saem edmure, but if he and his child are dead, or the child is a girl, then maybe it falls to arya? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Mountain That Flies Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 The Riverlands should awnser directly to King's Landing. Due to the geography and the quarrelsome nature of its Lords, the region is difficult to keep in order by just a Lord Paramount (or for that matter a king seen as too foreign like the Storm and Island Kings of old). Incorporating the entire region into the domain of King's Landing would give the River Lords sufficient placating to keep them in order, and would give the Iron Throne far greater resources to directly call upon as needed. Turning Harrenhall into a permanent military fortification for a standing Royalist force would be a good way to utilize what should be all rights be some the strongest holdings in Westeros. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
redtree Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 Just merge Riverlands and Crownlands, that'll be a huge advantage to whoever the king/queen in the future Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Graydon Hicks Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 thats an interesting idea. and with crown control of the territory, they control the flow of land trade through it. a massive boost for royal income. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Northman Reborn Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 Once Edmure and his son die, Bran is heir to Riverrun. And if he is a tree, then Rickon becomes heir. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Prince Yourwetdream Aeryn Posted August 23, 2017 Author Share Posted August 23, 2017 Edmure has great chance since he is five main characters' uncle. Rickon and Sansa will take North and Vale. Then happy ending. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
norwaywolf123 Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 Help: Do anyone know how i can add a picture to a comment? I am not sure if it is possible. Answear: - The trident and its tributaries should be founded as a new sub region of the riverlands to be ruled by House Frey or House Tully. This region could be called the Trident. - The parts of the riverlands that are not a part of the trident or its tributaries should be incorporated into the crownlands. Including the entire black water rush and its tributaries falling inside the territory of the riverlands. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
desire Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 Previously on the howbasic show to we watch Harren the black build a castle. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
velo-knight Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 If one realm: the Riverlands should answer to King's Landing directly, and further connections between the Crownlands and the Riverlands should be made. If the realms are separate: neighboring kingdoms should annex, or create suzerain vassal states in the portion of the Riverlands close to them - so the Starks to around Seagard, the Lannisters to past Riverrun, the Vale and Crownlands and Reach to various other portions. That leaves a rump kingdom which we can call the Kingdom of Harrenhal or something. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LordImp Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 12 hours ago, Free Northman Reborn said: Edmure and his son die, Why are you so sure Edmure dies? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Free Northman Reborn Posted August 23, 2017 Share Posted August 23, 2017 27 minutes ago, LordImp said: Why are you so sure Edmure dies? So as to make use of the extraordinairy coincidence that the Stark kids are the heirs to two kingdoms, something which has been exceedingly rare, and infact may never have been the case before in the history of Westeros, as far as we are aware. Joffrey might have been the first, except that we know he was not really the Baratheon heir. There may have been rare such instances before, but I can't think of one right now. Surely there must be a purpose behind Martin setting that up. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Fattest Leech Posted August 24, 2017 Share Posted August 24, 2017 3 hours ago, Free Northman Reborn said: So as to make use of the extraordinairy coincidence that the Stark kids are the heirs to two kingdoms, something which has been exceedingly rare, and infact may never have been the case before in the history of Westeros, as far as we are aware. Joffrey might have been the first, except that we know he was not really the Baratheon heir. There may have been rare such instances before, but I can't think of one right now. Surely there must be a purpose behind Martin setting that up. So who do you see taking the Riverlands if Edmure dies? Sorry if I missed that part. *nevermind... I found after my battle with my phone Bran or Rickon. So, if for some reason Sansa gets the Vale, then the north really expands? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
John Doe Posted August 24, 2017 Share Posted August 24, 2017 The Tullys. I could get behind the Mudds getting them if they aren't frauds though. And please stop calling people traitors for rebelling against Aerys, Aerys was a Madman and a terrible king, he provoced the rebellion himself by his unjust and cruel behaviour. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.