Daenerys is Azor Ahai.

[Darth Sidious]

On 1/1/2019 at 4:37 PM, James Fenimore Cooper XXII said:

Aemon realized the truth but it was too late.  He didn't make it to Meereen.  Too bad.  Maybe Marwyn will arrive safely.

There is still hope he might make it through the masters' blockade.  Marwyn and Moqorro in the same room would make for an awesome scene.  

[Quoth the raven,]

On 1/1/2019 at 5:09 AM, Free Northman Reborn said:

The Dragon has three heads and therefore Azor Ahai is three people.

Daenerys was the first, manifesting through the sacrifice of her son.

Tyrion was the second, manifesting through the sacrifice of his father.

And Jon will be the third, and will manifest through the sacrifice that will resurrect him from death. Not sure yet whose sacrifice that will be.

I don't think Azor Ahai is three people.  Daenerys is Azor Ahai.  The others are supporting characters perhaps.  

[Rose of Red Lake]

Is everyone on this website in the fire cult?

How do you know Azor Ahai is a hero?

How do you know Dany's success in bringing back dragons will actually save anyone? 

How do you know that she won't turn Westeros into one big Summerhall?

How do you know that "dawn"/ "lights" / "fire" are positive signs? The dragon pit burning down was described as a "false dawn." Whatever catastrophe happened in Hardhome was described as the same way. Yaaaay! Dawn! Sounds good right? But Harrenhal and the Tower of the Hand looked pretty candles and Dany and Selyse and Cersei all think fire is just *so* beautiful! We should too right? 

Wrong.

Stannis is a false Azor Ahai that leads Melisandre astray but Dany is likely the true Azor Ahai who leads readers astray. The text introduces dragons as an easy solution. She simply melts the Others away like dew in her dream? A dream in which she exults and feels triumphant about winning (never a good sign) and ends with a nod to "waking the dragon?" (Viserys! Yaaay!)

I'm not falling for it.

[Finley McLeod]

On 1/10/2019 at 8:48 PM, Quoth the raven, said:

I don't think Azor Ahai is three people.  Daenerys is Azor Ahai.  The others are supporting characters perhaps.  

 

[867-5309]

On 2/28/2018 at 12:05 AM, Here's Looking At You, Kid said:

The swords of pale fire baffled me.  Pale fire looks like electric light.  Light that does not come from a flame, which is yellow fire.  The glass candles may not be lanterns at all but weapons.  If the original story was inspired by the lord of rings then why not a weapon that glows when the enemy is nearby.  In this case, when the enemy is stirring.  Dany is Azor Ahai and she will end up owning a glass candle before the end of this story.  Think about this.  A sword that drives away the darkness.  The darkness fled before the sword.  The glass candles are burning bright and only light drives away the darkness.  It is not a sword but to the ancients, anything long, pointed, and used against an enemy is a sword.  I think George Martin is being cute here.   Maybe he's a Star Wars fan.  Glass Candle = Light + Sword = Lightsaber = lights the darkness = Lightbringer.  Or think of it as a big flashlight.  Dany is not a swordsman but she can wield a glass candle to light the darkness ahead.

 

On 3/4/2018 at 8:14 AM, Princess Daenerys said:

You may be right.  Dany fits the criteria to be Azor Ahai.  Drogo was her Nissa Nissa and the sacrifice led to the birth of the dragons.

If a sword can light up when orcs are near why not a sword that lights up when the others are coming.  I agree and it's not an actual sword that cuts flesh but one that cuts through the darkness like a blade of sunlight. 

This.  It's a light source that drove away the darkness.  The darkness fled before the lantern of light.  

[Black Dragons]

Rhaegar Targaryen is Azor Ahai in the books version he trying bring the 3 riders in his sigil.

[James Fenimore Cooper XXII]

2 minutes ago, Sophia [email protected] said:

Rhaegar Targaryen is Azor Ahai in the books version he trying bring the 3 riders in his sigil.

Hi there.  Rhaegar is long gone.  He was not the one who hatched the dragons.  The old kings in the vision referenced on this topic made no mention of Rhaegar.  They were encouraging Daenerys to wake the dragons.  They were each the Azor Ahai of the past.  For one, Rhaegar was never a king.  He was never close to becoming king of westeros.  Viserys was a king but he never got the chance to rule.  Only Daenerys has a the chance among the three children of Aerys and Rhaella to rule.  She is already a ruler among the Dothraki and the Ghiscari.  I believe Daenerys is Azor Ahai.

[Megorova]

58 minutes ago, James Fenimore Cooper XXII said:

The old kings in the vision referenced on this topic made no mention of Rhaegar.  They were encouraging Daenerys to wake the dragons.  They were each the Azor Ahai of the past.  For one, Rhaegar was never a king.  He was never close to becoming king of westeros.  Viserys was a king but he never got the chance to rule. 

Just because someone is wearing, what is described as "faded raiment of kings", doesn't mean, that this people/person are/were/is actual kings. Look at the way it's written, not "ghosts of kings", just ghosts in raiment of kings. And it's not the same thing.

"Ghosts lined the hallway, dressed in the faded raiment of kings. In their hands were swords of pale fire. They had hair of silver and hair of gold and hair of platinum white, and their eyes were opal and amethyst, tourmaline and jade. "Faster," they cried, "faster, faster." She raced, her feet melting the stone wherever they touched. "Faster!" the ghosts cried as one, and she screamed and threw herself forward."

For example, if someone is wearing black and red clothes, traditional coloring of Targaryens, then this clothes could be considered as "raiment of kings".