Jump to content

Ned wasn’t a true Stark


Canon Claude

Recommended Posts

6 hours ago, Ylath's Snout said:

Yes, southern matches aren't the same thing as declaring open rebelion, despite what I have seen some people say.

Those matches would put Rickard Stark in a powerful position to oppose his king if he wanted to and he should know that the Targaryens could never allow that to happen.  A monarch who allows his vassals to become more powerful that he is loses his power.  Aerys knew it.  Rickard knew it.  Robert knew it.  Aegon Frey knew it.   So while he may not be plotting to overthrow the Targaryens he had to know he was threatening their rule.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Anck Su Namun said:

Those matches would put Rickard Stark in a powerful position to oppose his king if he wanted to and he should know that the Targaryens could never allow that to happen.

Aerys did nothing about those matches and they were known for year so he could have done all sorts non-violent lawful of thing insure his power base.

But this is getting pretty off-topic

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The Northerners are more harsh.  Doubtful it's a family trait.  Rather it is a cultural trait.  The Boltons and the Starks have a lot more in common than they realize.  They just show it in different ways.  This Rickon looks like he's Theon the hungry wolf all over again.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The ways of the old gods are savage.  Remember the vision from Bran.  The early Starks fed human blood to their weirwood tree.  I would not be surprised if this practice continued in secret until Ned's generation.  Ned and Benjen may be different from their forefathers.  The Andal and its Seven diluted the extreme among the worshippers of the old gods.  The sharp edges slowly got rounder as the centuries moved on and the influence of the Seven affected the north.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Anck Su Namun said:

Those matches would put Rickard Stark in a powerful position to oppose his king if he wanted to and he should know that the Targaryens could never allow that to happen.  A monarch who allows his vassals to become more powerful that he is loses his power.  Aerys knew it.  Rickard knew it.  Robert knew it.  Aegon Frey knew it.   So while he may not be plotting to overthrow the Targaryens he had to know he was threatening their rule.  

More likely Varys was the orchestrator. I think Arys's mind wouldn't handle the implications. If Varys was part of Blackfyre rebellion #6 and working to weaken the Targ main line he might well have persuaded Aerys that Rickard was plotting a takeover to goad Aerys into acts what would foment a rebellion. It wouldn't matter which side won; it would weaken the realm to make the takeover easier for the Blackfyres.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 5/18/2018 at 7:43 PM, Canon Claude said:

Robb inherits Ned’s sense of honour and marries Jeyne Westerling, ignoring the warning of his direwolf when he rises to the Freys.

If Robb had inherited his father's sense of honour he would have married lord Frey's daughter. He didn't, because he didn't actually understand his father.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Geddus said:

If Robb had inherited his father's sense of honour he would have married lord Frey's daughter.

"Taking" a woman's virginity without marrying her is dishonorable, breaking a marriage-pact is dishonorable. Once he lay with Jenya he was in a no-win scenario. He just didn't understand how bad he screwed up until it was too late.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Ylath's Snout said:

"Taking" a woman's virginity without marrying her is dishonorable, breaking a marriage-pact is dishonorable. Once he lay with Jenya he was in a no-win scenario. He just didn't understand how bad he screwed up until it was too late.

I don't think that was a no-win scenario because the two options are not comparable: dishonoring a woman is one thing, breaking his word to one of his bannermen is something else entirely.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Geddus said:

I don't think that was a no-win scenario because the two options are not comparable: dishonoring a woman is one thing, breaking his word to one of his bannermen is something else entirely.

From a strikt "honor" point-of-view he'd tarnish himself either way. Jeyne is "ruined" in Westerosi society with very diminished opportunities for marriage after her and Robb took a tumble and Robb feels responsible for that. Politics is something else.

Also it could be argued that the bannerman in question was pretty much extorting him so... ehh the Later Walder Frey isn't really one to call foul on not delivering on feudal obligations.

However is this getting very off-topic, so agree to disagree?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Ylath's Snout said:

"Taking" a woman's virginity without marrying her is dishonorable, breaking a marriage-pact is dishonorable. Once he lay with Jenya he was in a no-win scenario. He just didn't understand how bad he screwed up until it was too late.

Robb lacked discipline.  He lacked honor.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...