Jump to content
Sign in to follow this  

Adbridged or unadbridged version of the history of the decline and fall of the Roman Empire?

Recommended Posts

On 6/25/2018 at 4:06 AM, Mwm said:

Which one and why?

It depends on why you would want to read it.  Personally I have a history degree and am very interested in history including reading the classics even though the information in them are now outdated.  So naturally I read the unabridged version.

If you're just reading Gibbon as a general reader then I say abridged.  If you're a history nut like I might be called then I recommend the unabridged.

On 6/26/2018 at 4:15 PM, Switzeran said:

Follow it up with Norwich's A Short History of Byzantium

I actually read this book a few years before I finally got Gibbon, so I could see the definite bias of Gibbon and centuries of further research as shown by Norwich when comparing the two.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
Sign in to follow this