Charlie Hustle Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Am i the only one who noticed that the next episode will be the end of Jamie? Bran said he didnt snitch because he would have been killed and they need as many able bodies to defend WF. When Jamie asked what about after the war, Bran states that somebody is going to die. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
btfu806 Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 So, do we know if Bran can see or predict the future? Or does he just truly know the scope of the WW army right now and doesn't think they will survive? It was an interesting comment though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nerevanin Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 I don't think that Bran sees the future and imo his comment was only an expression of doubts that they'll win. That being said, I think Jaime will die sooner or later. Bran, not so sure, especially as he just mentioned he is the memory of humankind and Sam said right after that losing Bran would be like losing the history and it would be lilke the ultimate dead. Because of that comment I think that Bran will survive, or he'll give the 3EC powers to someone else and then die. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ser Yorick Ampersand Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 I got worried about Jamie. I wouldn't want him to die. I hope he is the one who survives it all. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinscS2 Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Jamie: What about afterwards? Bran: How do you know there is an afterwards? Jamie ... ? This was chilling. It felt like this was Bran's way of saying "don't bother about it, you'll be dead anyway". Sadly, as much as I (really) like Jamie post S3, I do think he's one of the safer bets in the deadpool. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kajjo Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 2 hours ago, Charlie Hustle said: hen Jamie asked what about after the war, Bran states that somebody is going to die. No, he doesn't. Don't twist Bran's world, just state what he really said: "Who says there is an afterwards?" The battle is not won yet. All might die. Or at least Bran and Jamie might die. Brans statement could mean, one of them dies, but this could also simply mean he should focus on the present, because they don't know whether they will win the battle. My personal guess is indeed, that Jamie will probably die heroically, but I don't really think Bran is foreshadowing here. Jamie and Cersei is still a valid theory for the endgame. As far as we know, Bran cannot see the future. He states so himself in E2. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
a girl knows nothing Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Although I do think Jaime has a good chance of dying by the end of the season, I am not expecting it to happen in this battle. I am still holding out hope that he is the one to end Cersei. Also Bronn hasn't made it to Winterfell yet, and I think there will be some interaction between him, Tyrion, and Jaime. I think Bran's statement to Jaime was just emphasizing the uncertainty of how this will turn out. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
A Time for Starks Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 I posted this in the Jaime kills Night King post, but it also fits here... I believe Jaime is destined to kill the Night King (therefore becoming the Night King Slayer) and does it in episode 3. Even though Bran can't see the future, Bran does recognize that Jaime is very important in the battle against the dead. My guess: The battle will seem lost, with the Night King just about to get to and kill Bran. I can envision Jaime charging the Night King in the same manner he charges Dany in the Field of Fire. But this time he hits his mark and kills the Night King, and also becomes mortally wounded in the process. He'll probably die in Brienne's arms, possibly confessing his love for her. It will have the symmetry as he was the one to push Bran out the window in the beginning, but now he is the one to save Bran from the Night King. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Runaway Penguin Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 That is the problem with cryptic statements: They can mean anything "Who says there is an afterwards?" Bran thinks everyone dies. Bran thinks Jaime dies. Bran thinks Bran dies. Bran wants to observe Jaime during the battle to see if he deserves his silence. Bran thinks there will be no Bran left after the encounter, just three eyed raven all over and as such it is immaterial... Or it is just a reminder "Make sure tomorrow happens!" or a lot of other meanings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Winter Rose Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 When Bran says he wants to be the bait, I thought it's given he dies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Cambodia Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 It took Bran to mean he knows Jamie will die. For me the only question is next week will Jamie die in Brienne's arms or will Brienne die in Jamie's arms? There'll be more tears than anything since The Door, either way. Jamie definitely has to die a hero's death at some point, and I do think Bran's death will be key to the demise of the NK. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Hustle Posted April 22, 2019 Author Share Posted April 22, 2019 2 hours ago, Kajjo said: No, he doesn't. Don't twist Bran's world, just state what he really said: "Who says there is an afterwards?" The battle is not won yet. All might die. Or at least Bran and Jamie might die. Brans statement could mean, one of them dies, but this could also simply mean he should focus on the present, because they don't know whether they will win the battle. My personal guess is indeed, that Jamie will probably die heroically, but I don't really think Bran is foreshadowing here. Jamie and Cersei is still a valid theory for the endgame. As far as we know, Bran cannot see the future. He states so himself in E2. Dont have time to find the exact quote. Thats semantics. But i noticed that is or could be a foreshadowing of Jamie's demise. I predict the next episode is his last. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kajjo Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 2 minutes ago, Charlie Hustle said: I predict the next episode is his last. Well, of course there is the chance that Jamie dies. It even is somehow likely. No matter what Bran said. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlie Hustle Posted April 22, 2019 Author Share Posted April 22, 2019 Dang! that means they are saving Cerscei for the endgame. Do you think the WW will be a factor after ep3? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Every Last Chicken Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 I think @MinscS2 quoted the exact line which was "How do you know there is an afterwards?" which can mean quite a bit. If Bran can see or have premonitions of events in the future, maybe he is genuinely dumbfounded and believes Jamie is saying something that is true but otherwise has no way of knowing it (that there is an afterwards). Or Jamie is dead... Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LyrnaSnowBunnyAvenger Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Until Jaime kills Cersei, I think he's safe. Now, of course that could happen in the next episode with the magic teleportation devices they have between King's Landing and Winterfell, but I find it unlikely. Yeah, I know there is debate as to who the younger brother actually is but Tyrion would be a boring option. Jaime would be awesome. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinscS2 Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 4 minutes ago, LyrnaSnowBunnyAvenger said: Until Jaime kills Cersei, I think he's safe. If the Valonquar-prohecy had been prominent, or even mentioned in the show, I'd be willing to agree, but it isn't. I'll be very afraid for Jamies sake in the next episode, that's for sure, especially given how much screen time he and Tyrion got together in this episode. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
LyrnaSnowBunnyAvenger Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 1 minute ago, MinscS2 said: If the Valonquar-prohecy had been prominent, or even mentioned in the show, I'd be willing to agree, but it isn't. I'll be very afraid for Jamies sake in the next episode, that's for sure, especially given how much screen time he and Tyrion got together in this episode. Unless I'm completely off my rocker (which would not be surprising), I'm around 98% sure it was mentioned in the show. It was not prominent, but it was mentioned both in the Maggy the Frog scene and Cersei said something about being killed by her little brother. I do not think I'm making this up, but I certainly could be wrong. That happens. If I am wrong, then yes I'd agree he certainly is in danger of being killed. If it was though, I still think he's going to be safe until he kills her. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
MinscS2 Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 Just now, LyrnaSnowBunnyAvenger said: Unless I'm completely off my rocker (which would not be surprising), I'm around 98% sure it was mentioned in the show. It was not prominent, but it was mentioned both in the Maggy the Frog scene and Cersei said something about being killed by her little brother. I do not think I'm making this up, but I certainly could be wrong. That happens. If I am wrong, then yes I'd agree he certainly is in danger of being killed. If it was though, I still think he's going to be safe until he kills her. Honestly, I could be wrong too. Wouldn't be the first time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
no_one_... Posted April 22, 2019 Share Posted April 22, 2019 1 hour ago, Every Last Chicken said: I think @MinscS2 quoted the exact line which was "How do you know there is an afterwards?" which can mean quite a bit. If Bran can see or have premonitions of events in the future, maybe he is genuinely dumbfounded and believes Jamie is saying something that is true but otherwise has no way of knowing it (that there is an afterwards). Or Jamie is dead... Bran has had visions of the future in the form of imagery since season 1, eg the sea flooding Winterfell. Going with episode 1 mirroring s1e1 theory , then everyone Jon touched will die,ie Bran and Sansa will die. I'm guessing Jamie will die, but not before killing the mad queen. OT, why haven't Bran and Sam worked to figure out how the NK was defeated the 1st time around,and told everyone. Seems they should have far more intel. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.