Jump to content

Is Young Griffs invasion filler?


Tyrion1991

Recommended Posts

 
 
 
2
12 hours ago, The Hoare said:

Yes, he was lying about the tyroshi mother. It was just a excuse to explain the blue hair

 

Yep, reached that line in the books as well, thank you :)

Another thing I noticed in the JonCon POV-Chapter is that he says Aegon is a lad of 18. Is this consistent with the timeline? 

When the dead bodies of Rhaegar's children were laid down, if I remember correctly, Aegon was described as a 'baby', which I would consider a child of max 1 year. According to Robert and Ned, Robert's rebellion took place 15 years ago. Since Robert's and Ned's death round about a year has passed.

Shouldn't Aegon be maximally 17? Or am I too strict on the whole age thing?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...