Jump to content

Is Young Griffs invasion filler?

Recommended Posts

12 hours ago, The Hoare said:

Yes, he was lying about the tyroshi mother. It was just a excuse to explain the blue hair


Yep, reached that line in the books as well, thank you :)

Another thing I noticed in the JonCon POV-Chapter is that he says Aegon is a lad of 18. Is this consistent with the timeline? 

When the dead bodies of Rhaegar's children were laid down, if I remember correctly, Aegon was described as a 'baby', which I would consider a child of max 1 year. According to Robert and Ned, Robert's rebellion took place 15 years ago. Since Robert's and Ned's death round about a year has passed.

Shouldn't Aegon be maximally 17? Or am I too strict on the whole age thing?

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Griff is the right age.  Judging age based on appearance is not precise.  Boys develop at different rates.

Share this post

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now