LadyOfCastamere Posted June 5, 2019 Share Posted June 5, 2019 2 12 hours ago, The Hoare said: Yes, he was lying about the tyroshi mother. It was just a excuse to explain the blue hair Yep, reached that line in the books as well, thank you Another thing I noticed in the JonCon POV-Chapter is that he says Aegon is a lad of 18. Is this consistent with the timeline? When the dead bodies of Rhaegar's children were laid down, if I remember correctly, Aegon was described as a 'baby', which I would consider a child of max 1 year. According to Robert and Ned, Robert's rebellion took place 15 years ago. Since Robert's and Ned's death round about a year has passed. Shouldn't Aegon be maximally 17? Or am I too strict on the whole age thing? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Valicious Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 The real Aegon was born early 282, we're in 300 so he is 18... At least that's what Jon Connington thinks. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Commentator Posted June 6, 2019 Share Posted June 6, 2019 Griff is the right age. Judging age based on appearance is not precise. Boys develop at different rates. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.