Jump to content
Jace, Basilissa

U.S. Politics: You Didn't Think It Would Be So Easy, Did You?

Recommended Posts

Hey guys, if any of you need a good pair of running shoes, time is running out. A $150 pair is going to be $210 or $220 after the tariffs hit. I understand good work boots go up even more.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
9 minutes ago, Fragile Bird said:

Hey guys, if any of you need a good pair of running shoes, time is running out. A $150 pair is going to be $210 or $220 after the tariffs hit. I understand good work boots go up even more.

Sounds like China is digging in for the long haul, too.

The trade war is forcing China to ‘rethink economic ties’ to the US

https://www.cnbc.com/2019/05/22/trade-war-forcing-china-to-rethink-economic-ties-with-the-us.html

Quote

 

While China is open to resuming trade talks, “government advisers are now highlighting the risk of sourcing critical supplies from an increasingly hostile US...and are exploring ways for the country to cut its exposure to the US,” the paper said, citing Chinese researchers. The article was titled, “Donald Trump’s trade war and Huawei ban push China to rethink economic ties with US.”

And China is considering cutting natural gas purchases from the U.S. as part of this movement, the paper said.

“The idea that China should buy large amounts of natural gas from the U.S. must be revisited,” Wang Yongzhong, a senior fellow at the Chinese Academy of Social Sciences, a governmental think tank, told the Hong Kong-based newspaper Monday.

The move came after President Donald Trump’s latest action to blacklist Huawei, effectively halting its ability to buy American-made parts and components. China is now threatening to stop funding an industry that the two countries have done sizable deals in. In 2017, China agreed to fund a natural gas project in Alaska worth $43 billion, the South China Morning Post said.

 

 

Edited by Martell Spy

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fragile Bird said:

Hey guys, if any of you need a good pair of running shoes, time is running out. A $150 pair is going to be $210 or $220 after the tariffs hit. I understand good work boots go up even more.

Though the cost to import, including tariffs is still only $15.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Not like I'm Paul Krugman or anything, but I have been very surprised that the economy on the main indicators has stayed so solid given all of the trade bluster.  But perhaps it's only just beginning to really come home to roost.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, The Anti-Targ said:

Though the cost to import, including tariffs is still only $15.

Well, apparently a Nike running shoe that retails for $100 on average costs Nike $28.50. They sell the shoe to the retailer for $50.00 and the retailer sells it for $100.

Factory fob cost is $25 + $1.00 sea freight and insurance + $2.50 in duty = $28.50.

 

Edited by Fragile Bird

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Fragile Bird said:

Well, apparently a Nike running shoe that retails for $100 on average costs Nike $28.50. They sell the shoe to the retailer for $50.00 and the retailer sells it for $100.

Factory fob cost is $25 + $1.00 sea freight and insurance + $2.50 in duty = $28.50.

 

Wow, so my total guess was not that far off. $150 Nikes probably cost $30, and $200 Nikes $35. Or may even have the same wholesale cost.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 hours ago, Fragile Bird said:

Hey guys, if any of you need a good pair of running shoes, time is running out. A $150 pair is going to be $210 or $220 after the tariffs hit. I understand good work boots go up even more.

The best work boots are made in Canada. Terras. 

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
17 hours ago, Zorral said:

Why is the media not even mentioning the total staged temper tantrum?

It seems you got what you wanted. Every media source I frequent has panned Trump for his obviously staged performance.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)
12 hours ago, Fragile Bird said:

Hey guys, if any of you need a good pair of running shoes, time is running out. A $150 pair is going to be $210 or $220 after the tariffs hit. I understand good work boots go up even more.

Say what now BIRD!? I’m going to have to pay even more for my sweatshop Jordans? This is absurd!

This is America damn it! Tell those other kids with them pumped up kicks that they better run, out run my gun! 

Edited by Tywin et al.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
2 hours ago, Tywin et al. said:

It seems you got what you wanted. Every media source I frequent has panned Trump for his obviously staged performance.

But not one of those I frequent even mentioned it was totally staged.  And still aren't doing so.

But then, I don't do twitter, so .... :dunno:

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
4 hours ago, Tywin et al. said:

Say what now BIRD!? I’m going to have to pay even more for my sweatshop Jordans? This is absurd!

This is America damn it! Tell those other kids with them pumped up kicks that they better run, out run my gun! 

Talking about guns is dangerous.

You should be careful.

You can't change the 2nd Amendment. 

It can never be changed.

Don't make us change you.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Posted (edited)

"Crazy Nancy" (guess who calls her that ....) -- crazy like a fox?

Strategy, They / Some Suggest, is to get him to reveal constantly how deranged he is:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/23/us/politics/impeaching-trump-nancy-pelosi.html?

Quote

 

.... Mr. Trump had “another temper tantrum,” she told reporters at her weekly news conference at the Capitol. “Again, I pray for the president of the United States. I wish that his family or his administration or his staff would have an intervention for the good of the country.”

Her remarks — intended to belittle Mr. Trump in the same way he denigrates his political opponents — are part of a calculated campaign by the speaker to pair public comments with private calls for House Democrats to avoid being goaded into impeachment.

His response just hours later suggested that it was working.

Ms. Pelosi faced down calls from about 25 House Democrats who want her to move immediately on impeachment during a meeting with her caucus on Wednesday. Instead she urged them to “follow the facts” by allowing court cases to play out before passing final judgment.

Since then, a federal court on Wednesday affirmed the House’s right to obtain Mr. Trump’s financial records, the second such ruling this week.

“What really got to him,” Ms. Pelosi said, was “these court cases and the fact that the House Democratic caucus is not on a path to impeachment.”

“That’s where he wants us to be,” she told reporters, adding, “The White House is just crying out for impeachment” to divide Democrats and take the focus off the president’s failures and policy inaction.

Earlier Thursday, during a closed-door session with her caucus, Ms. Pelosi made the case more explicitly, arguing that the president hoped to provoke impeachment in order to achieve public exoneration by the Republican-controlled  Senate, which acts as the final arbiter on impeachment hearings....

 

But ... I'm not sure.  It's impossible to strategize anything concerning a deranged person.  He's deranged and there is simply no way a non-deranged person can get inside of that head. You cannot predict what someone like him will do, or manipulate someone like him either, because you are not deranged and he will never behave like anybody else, even other evil persons.

 

Edited by Zorral

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
9 minutes ago, Zorral said:

"Crazy Nancy" (guess who calls her that ....) -- crazy like a fox?

Strategy, They / Some Suggest, is to get him to reveal constantly how deranged he is:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/23/us/politics/impeaching-trump-nancy-pelosi.html?

But ... I'm not sure.  It's impossible to strategize anything concerning a deranged person.  He's deranged and there is simply no way a non-deranged person can get inside of that head. You cannot predict what someone like him will do, or manipulate someone like him either, because you are not deranged and he will never behave like anybody else, even other evil persons.

 

Actually it's the best strategy I've seen employed. Emasculation is the only thing that would make Daddy unappetizing to his followers. 

And highlighting his insanity is exactly what you wanna do. Intelligent people who are just Republican for the tax cuts and deregulation actually do get put off by him at his most gibbering. I've seen it myself. Whether you can push him enough to get those people to actually flip is a question that needs an answer.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
6 hours ago, Zorral said:

But not one of those I frequent even mentioned it was totally staged.  And still aren't doing so.

But then, I don't do twitter, so .... :dunno:

Twitter is a cesspool. I mainly rely on NPR, NBS, CNN and a number of online publications like the NYT, WaPo and especially The Guardian. And from what I'm seeing, that narrative has basically been in all of those places in one way or another.

54 minutes ago, Jace, Basilissa said:

Actually it's the best strategy I've seen employed. Emasculation is the only thing that would make Daddy unappetizing to his followers. 

And highlighting his insanity is exactly what you wanna do. Intelligent people who are just Republican for the tax cuts and deregulation actually do get put off by him at his most gibbering. I've seen it myself. Whether you can push him enough to get those people to actually flip is a question that needs an answer.

Agreed. Angry Trump is likely to say whatever is on the top of mind. However, there is the risk of this causing him to do something insane. I thought I heard something like he mentioned in passing that he's considered deputizing the military. WTF would that actually mean?  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Tywin et al. said:

 

Agreed. Angry Trump is likely to say whatever is on the top of mind. However, there is the risk of this causing him to do something insane. I thought I heard something like he mentioned in passing that he's considered deputizing the military. WTF would that actually mean?  

Let's find out.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 minute ago, Jace, Basilissa said:

Let's find out.

Given your title, you shouldn't test the unknown, like seeing what happens when you fight a silly Caucasian girl who likes to play with Samurai swords.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
1 hour ago, Zorral said:

"Crazy Nancy" (guess who calls her that ....) -- crazy like a fox?

Strategy, They / Some Suggest, is to get him to reveal constantly how deranged he is:

https://www.nytimes.com/2019/05/23/us/politics/impeaching-trump-nancy-pelosi.html?

But ... I'm not sure.  It's impossible to strategize anything concerning a deranged person.  He's deranged and there is simply no way a non-deranged person can get inside of that head. You cannot predict what someone like him will do, or manipulate someone like him either, because you are not deranged and he will never behave like anybody else, even other evil persons.

 

When people say "he wants the democrats to do this" what they really mean is his handlers who do understand the strategic value of the House rabidly going after impeachment while there is a Republican majority in the senate. For a Republican senate to convict Trump they would have to see Trump's base evaporate, and their individual electoral fortunes be placed at great risk, and then they might act. Though voting to convict based on a Democratic House impeachment would still need them to calculate whether they would lose more by convicting or by not convicting. Agreeing with or cooperating with Democrats is pretty much the king of all sins.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching Trump in action is like seeing a Toddler with poopie pants deny that he needs changing, and then flings his faeces.

NP has a great strategy. I do hope dems stick together even more than last time so that the people can fire the orange menace. Go Nona Nancy!

Keep the legal pressure up. Let’s uncover his criminality, as that is the other civilized method of treating treasonous, cheating, unprofessional, immature and fraudulent behavior.

Any Republicans think that extortion and a TT  to do avoid doing the job he was elected for is worth supporting? But no he can’t, because NP used a forbidden word. Cover up. Let’s count up all the times Trump has baselessly insulted people.

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

So now, we find ourselves in a situation where families and companies are paying billions of dollars in extra taxes each year, part of which are being funneled to farmers who can no longer sell their soybeans, because Beijing decided to slap retaliatory tariffs on their crops. According to the White House, $14.5 billion of the bailout fund will be paid directly to farm owners; most of the rest will be used to buy some of the commodities piling up in lots so they can be sent to schools, food banks, and programs for the poor. This is all on top of a $12 billion package Trump announced last year. The grand total, $28 billion, is about what the U.S. spent last school year on Pell grants for college students. It’s not a small amount of money.

Politically, this makes obvious sense. Rural voters are a key constituency for Trump. And angry farmers could create enough political pressure to force him to back down in his conflict with Beijing. Your typical middle-class shopper, meanwhile, probably isn’t going to notice the price bump from tariffs on her Walmart receipt. By keeping soy and corn growers happy, Trump is making it possible to keep waging his trade fight. He’s deflecting the blow to people who won’t necessarily feel it.

I, for One, Am Displeased About Having to Pay for Trump’s New $16 Billion Farmer Bailout

https://slate.com/business/2019/05/trumps-usd16-billion-farmer-bailout-for-tariffs-what-the-heck.html

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites

Can you imagine if the situation was reversed and a Dem president was going for a government bailout for a sector destroyed by the market as it is?  Of course, in this reality, Dems will likely not start attacking the farmers receiving this bailout as handout seekers or special interest as would have been the case in the alternate reality.  

Share this post


Link to post
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.

×