Jump to content

Who was the best hand of the king?


King17

Recommended Posts

For me it would be Baelor Targaryen. His actions in the Ashford tourney made it clear that he was a really just and brave man.

2 hours ago, Putin said:

Tywin Lannister

He was certainly competent, and his most awful actions (the massacre of Castamere, the sack of KL and the murder of Elia and her kids) happened when he was no longer a Hand.

However, I'd say he is far from the ideal hand. It seems that he was not content with keeping a low profile, and let Aerys take the credit. He allowed his captain of the guards to boast that he was more powerful than the king. He tried to manipulate him to marry her daughter to the heir of the crown. And probably he could have made more to ensure the king's safe release during the Defiance.

Admitedly Aerys was mad as nuts and Tywin is an able administrator, but his extreme methods and his blind spots (mainly his pride and his kids) are huge downsides.

1 hour ago, James Steller said:

Septon Barth. 

Barth appears to be a great Hand with plenty of accomplishments. My only issue with him is that he may be partly responsible for Jaehaerys' most misogynistic tendencies. Also, I think that he should have put some work in leaving a written succession law to avoid the chaotic later years of rule and the Dance of Dragons. IMO, choosing Baelon over Rhaenys was not the greatest decision, but once that was decided, it should have been accompanied with a clear and defined rule of succession.

 

1 hour ago, Floki of the Ironborn said:

Viserys Targaryen II

I'm not sure about him. He certainly wasn't able to control the excesses of his nephews, and there are theories that suggest that he was involved in their deaths. It's also debatable whether he usurped the throne from Daena.

I'm very interested in reading more about him in FIB 2, but seeing how his wife left him, he forced the marriage of Aegon and Naerys, and was in at least some ways responsible of how Aegon the Unworthy turned up, I have my doubts about how good a hand he really was.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, The hairy bear said:

Barth appears to be a great Hand with plenty of accomplishments. My only issue with him is that he may be partly responsible for Jaehaerys' most misogynistic tendencies. Also, I think that he should have put some work in leaving a written succession law to avoid the chaotic later years of rule and the Dance of Dragons. IMO, choosing Baelon over Rhaenys was not the greatest decision, but once that was decided, it should have been accompanied with a clear and defined rule of succession.

I don't know how much can be blamed on him. Jaeharys was how he was and Baelon was a great choice, morality aside. 

The Dance can't be pinned on him, he himself died before Baelon and the Kings.

 

 

3 hours ago, The hairy bear said:

I'm not sure about him. He certainly wasn't able to control the excesses of his nephews, and there are theories that suggest that he was involved in their deaths. It's also debatable whether he usurped the throne from Daena.

I'm very interested in reading more about him in FIB 2, but seeing how his wife left him, he forced the marriage of Aegon and Naerys, and was in at least some ways responsible of how Aegon the Unworthy turned up, I have my doubts about how good a hand he really was

He was able to keep the Realm together even with his nephews decided  to tear  the Realm apart. When the King has almost all power, what you can do is often limited to what the King let you to do.

He ruled  with his brother and keep things quiet  while Daeron and Baelor did their things and whereas  I do think he def usurped his nieces, that has nothing to do with his tenure as Hand.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, frenin said:

He was able to keep the Realm together even with his nephews decided  to tear  the Realm apart. When the King has almost all power, what you can do is often limited to what the King let you to do.

He ruled  with his brother and keep things quiet  while Daeron and Baelor did their things and whereas  I do think he def usurped his nieces, that has nothing to do with his tenure as Hand.

Are you kidding? It was clearly Aegon IV who offed his cousin, and then his father. I'm looking forward to that reveal in "Fire & Blood Part II".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Floki of the Ironborn said:

Are you kidding? It was clearly Aegon IV who offed his cousin, and then his father. I'm looking forward to that reveal in "Fire & Blood Part II".

I did not say, he killed his nephew, I said he usurped his nieces.

And Baelor didn't need help to die, extreme fasting already does the job for anyone interested.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frenin said:

I did not say, he killed his nephew, I said he usurped his nieces.

And Baelor didn't need help to die, extreme fasting already does the job for anyone interested.

My mistake. And if we're going to accuse Viserys of snubbing women, we might as well say that for most of the Targaryen kings. They all got where they were because women didn't have a fair shake at the throne.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Floki of the Ironborn said:

My mistake. And if we're going to accuse Viserys of snubbing women, we might as well say that for most of the Targaryen kings. They all got where they were because women didn't have a fair shake at the throne.

Well, the only one who actually made a very good use of that precedent were Viserys and Jaeharys.

At least Viserys 1 was elected via Great Council.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frenin said:

Well, the only one who actually made a very good use of that precedent were Viserys and Jaeharys.

At least Viserys 1 was elected via Great Council.

 

You can't just include Viserys and Jaeharys, you have to include all their descendants who sat on the Iron Throne. They all benefited from their ancestor benefitting from sexism. If one of them didn't become king, none of the later ones would become king either, they might not even have been born, who knows what else changes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 3/12/2020 at 4:52 AM, King17 said:

So out of all the hands the realm has had which one was the best? And why?

Septon Barth or Tywin Lannister. Pretty simple as no other Hand of The King comes close - and don't say Bloodraven because he wasn't even close to them in terms of ability at keeping peace and prosperity.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brandon Ice-Eyes said:

Septon Barth or Tywin Lannister. Pretty simple as no other Hand of The King comes close - and don't say Bloodraven because he wasn't even close to them in terms of ability at keeping peace and prosperity.

Viserys II does come pretty close and his task was way harder. The fact that the Realm didn't fall apart during the tenure of father and sons can be attributed in great part to him.

 

@Floki of the Ironborn

I know that but still, the ones directly affected by said decrees, were only two. Rogar crowned Jaeharys and Viserys was crowned by the Council.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...