Jump to content

The Locked Tomb Trilogy by Tamsyn Muir


Werthead
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, karaddin said:

I'm not even convinced that true FTL travel is good enough to explain the spread of non-Nine Houses humans in 10k years, I get the impression their populations are significant and they are *very* spread out, so its going to need to be a lot more than just FTL but its clear from As Yet Unsent

  Hide contents

That whatever they have is still inferior to travel via Stele, which itself is dramatically worse than non-local/linear travel through the River. Which at the very least implies that both BoE and Stele travel doesn't let them just blip from one place to another

Where I'm going with this is that given what John says about it in Ht9 I won't be surprised if it turns out that BoE FTL, at least the initial version, threw them back in time and humanity has actually been spreading for a lot longer than just 10k years. Or something else along these lines.

Also (Nona spoiler)

  Hide contents

Nice point regarding it being worth sacrificing the Dominicus system to get rid of John. At the end of Ht9 I thought they were cracked from 10k years and their value system was broken, but knowing how small the population of the NIne Houses actually is compared to the human diaspora elsewhere, and just how monstrous John actually is its absolutely worth that trade. 

 

Yeah what I thought from the quotation was that they'd been spread across time and space by whatever jank FTL method was first discovered and used back then.

Regarding the current methods it seems that Stele travel is implied to be instant but only goes to pre-made anchor points (there's a comment about this in Harrow about setting up these being an important Lyctor job since they can go wherever through the river), and yeah it does feel like there must be some slow but useable method for BoE to get around under the noses of the houses. I get the impression that most of the time that human populations are moved it is by the forces of Jod forcibly relocating them after the planets they were on were killed and reached the point of uninhabitability though, but BoE feels too widespread and organised to be just hiding amongst those populations.

To your other point: 

Spoiler

I don't think it'd ever be... Right I guess? To plan to sacrifice the population of Dominicus and in fairness to them Mercy and Augustine did, in Harrow, talk about having plans for an evacuation, but obviously couldn't go through with then because of the circumstances of their assassination opportunity. As a kinda "double effect" of removing a terrible evil from the universe I think it was one they were (perhaps rightly) willing to have on their consciences though when push came to shove, and they were both ready to sacrifice themselves in the attempt or die afterwards so yeah I think they were being as rational and ethical as a ten thousand year old horror realising the enormity of the evil of their boss/god/ex-friend can be. 

All that said I am wondering how much information we lack given the crazy shit going on with the river and those undead things. Is it all him and his existence and power and all the evil planet killing and soul manipulation/eating he's doing that's creating these problems? Did killing him however temporarily start some kind of chain reaction / release some of this evil that's been building up? So when/if death finally sticks to him how many more problems will there be to deal with? Is necromancy the only solution? Is there a better way? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

One thing that's been bugging me in Nona:

Spoiler

We see that the ecosystem of the planet they're on has been ravaged. Characters have to wear masks outside, it's implied that they're going through their own global climate catastrophe (too hot during the day), the sea walls can't open and the harbor is clogged with venomous stinging jellyfish, etc. How TF did that happen? How much of the population is living in poverty? And what does that say about humanity as a whole that they keep having to get evacuated off of planets after they destroy them? (that alone suggests to me that the timeline is much longer than 10K years.) What is Tasmyn trying to say about humanity in general? 

I mean, like, John sucks. But honestly it sounds like humanity is destroying as many planets (with the consequent human misery) as the Lyctors are, they just aren't creating RBs when they do it. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Poobah said:

Regarding the current methods it seems that Stele travel is implied to be instant but only goes to pre-made anchor points (there's a comment about this in Harrow about setting up these being an important Lyctor job since they can go wherever through the river), and yeah it does feel like there must be some slow but useable method for BoE to get around under the noses of the houses.

  Hide contents

All that said I am wondering how much information we lack given the crazy shit going on with the river and those undead things. Is it all him and his existence and power and all the evil planet killing and soul manipulation/eating he's doing that's creating these problems? Did killing him however temporarily start some kind of chain reaction / release some of this evil that's been building up? So when/if death finally sticks to him how many more problems will there be to deal with? Is necromancy the only solution? Is there a better way? 

I can't remember if it was here or on Reddit, but I did see someone say

Spoiler

A holy Trinity (given all the catholicism) of Gideon, Harrow and Alecto might be the end state. Given John dying doesn't seem like it's going to make the RB problem go away I do think they're going to need some ability to address issues going forward that purely tech humans don't have access to.

On the Stele travel front, I thought when Ianthe freaks out about how useful river travel would be to the cohort there's an implication it's better than Stele travel due to more reasons than just not needing the infrastructure already in place. Although she does talk about fuel so maybe those two advantages were all.

1 hour ago, Xray the Enforcer said:

One thing that's been bugging me in Nona:

  Hide contents

We see that the ecosystem of the planet they're on has been ravaged. Characters have to wear masks outside, it's implied that they're going through their own global climate catastrophe (too hot during the day), the sea walls can't open and the harbor is clogged with venomous stinging jellyfish, etc. How TF did that happen? How much of the population is living in poverty? And what does that say about humanity as a whole that they keep having to get evacuated off of planets after they destroy them? (that alone suggests to me that the timeline is much longer than 10K years.) What is Tasmyn trying to say about humanity in general? 

I mean, like, John sucks. But honestly it sounds like humanity is destroying as many planets (with the consequent human misery) as the Lyctors are, they just aren't creating RBs when they do it. 

 

You've just made me realize

Spoiler

I read the entire book assuming it was so bad because Lyctors had killed the planet already and this is what that gradual death looks like before the population hits the point of needing to be evacuated, but now I'm unsure that's actually stated or it was entirely an assumption.

Varun the Eater doesn't eat the planet though, although Alecto's presence is sufficient to explain that without another reason.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 9/26/2022 at 4:29 PM, karaddin said:
  Hide contents

On the things at the Ninth, I saw a a theory that the drill shaft of Drearburh is paired with or the mirror reverse of the tower in the river. Or, and I'm just trying to think it through now - the two are in the same place, one in the river and one in the physical world.

Spoiler

It seems unlikely they're in exactly the same location (that would make getting into Drearburh impossible, surely?) but I wouldn't be surprised if that's where the tower came from. Though at least the opening of the shaft is square, not round.

On 9/26/2022 at 4:29 PM, karaddin said:
  Hide contents

I've been intrigued with the theory that Drearburh is actually on the moon, not Pluto, ever since I first saw it...

All the other issues with cold and lack of light can be due to it being at the bottom of the drill shaft and close to a pole.

Spoiler

"The bright bead of Dominicus winked benignly down the mouth of the long vertical tunnel" implies it's not the Moon; that's describing a star much further away. And the shaft is obviously not at the pole, either. Whatever planet it is, I suspect it's tidally locked to the sun. But if you ignore that, the depth of the shaft would insulate Drearburh from the Moon's surface temperature changes, and the average temperature is substantially colder than Earth's. Hmm... I suppose there could be a lens or curved mirror at the top of the shaft that keeps Dominicus constantly visible but looking smaller than it should?

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just to be clear I think the obvious location is the most likely one, this alternate theory is a crackpot that I think has some potential but a long way from being sure its right haha.

2 hours ago, felice said:
  Hide contents

It seems unlikely they're in exactly the same location (that would make getting into Drearburh impossible, surely?) but I wouldn't be surprised if that's where the tower came from. Though at least the opening of the shaft is square, not round.

 

I'm not doing a good job of describing it because I'm not sure how to even conceptualize what I mean

Spoiler

They're not literally in the same location, in part because I don't think the River has geography in that sense anyway. I think they are....spiritually? a pair, two halves of the same coin, mirrors of each other...that sort of thing. As much as they can be when one is a concrete physical place and the other is a materialized concept inside an abstract dimension. Perhaps a terrible ASCII diagram would help!

Physical reality ------------------        --------------

The drill shaft                                |        |

Dreadburh                                     |_____|

The tower                                      |        |

The river           ----------------- |        |

                                                       |        |

River bottom / hell --------------|        |

                                                       |        |

This isn't perfect though, then enter into the tower then rise out of the river and they're in the shuttle fields which are halfway down the shaft rather than at the top or bottom lol. But yeah, some abstract spiritual same location

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, karaddin said:

Just to be clear I think the obvious location is the most likely one, this alternate theory is a crackpot that I think has some potential but a long way from being sure its right haha.

It would make a lot of sense; the Moon's internal temperature near the surface is apparently around -30 to -40 degrees C, and I think you'd have to go a loooong way down (dozens of km at least) to get above freezing, which seems like a good fit for Drearburh. While Pluto's crust is made of frozen nitrogen on top of frozen water below -200 degrees C - good luck drilling a habitable shaft in that! It's only the view of Dominicus that doesn't fit, and a transparent dome at the top of the shaft would be very reasonable - I'm not sure what sort of curvature or refractive index it would need, though.

19 hours ago, karaddin said:
  Hide contents

As much as they can be when one is a concrete physical place and the other is a materialized concept inside an abstract dimension.

Spoiler

My guess is the tower is a real physical object that was transported into the abstract dimension, rather than being a materialized concept. But we don't have much hard info to go on yet...

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

There was some discussion of the moon idea on Reddit as well with someone bringing up some passages from the start of Gt9 talking about Drearburh/the drill shaft. The main bits I remember were that the atmosphere inside the shaft varies in thickness and visibly so, the atmosphere is pumped in so it's not a natural feature of the celestial body it's on, and I think the atmosphere was giving the sky a non black colour.

I'd taken the atmosphere thinning to imply that the shaft isn't actually sealed, but the atmosphere is kept in the shaft by gravity which felt... Unsafe lol. But with your suggestion of a dome at the top causing lensing it makes a lot more sense, the shaft does not have an adequate amount of atmosphere to fill it so you get thicker atmosphere at the bottom and where the vents are blowing it out and thinner at the top.

I'd also been inaccurately picturing the prison facility above Drearburh as being hovering or low orbital, but these same passages also makes it sound much more likely that it's about half way down the shaft and is where the atmosphere starts to really thin.

I'm really liking your idea that it's lensing from a dome that's making Dominicus look further away.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Actually on the subject of the prison, we have absolutely no idea who is imprisoned there which seems a bit weird. John refers to it as a decoy facility in Ht9, but no one from the other houses has ever indicated knowledge its even there. 

Spoiler

Makes me wonder if its a long shot as another source of the 'damned'. Early in Gt9 when Gideon is reflecting on her mother there's a comment about checking with the facility to make sure no one had escaped from there, so on the one hand that makes it less likely since there are actual regular mortal guards there. On the other hand the idea of escapees getting down the shaft has already been primed so who knows.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 11 months later...
4 hours ago, Jaxom 1974 said:

Resurrecting...heh...this thread as I have finally begun a journey reading the second book...and it's kinda bonkers. Am I going to feel lost the entire time I'm reading...? 

Probably yes, it has (tagged as I can’t remember how early in the book this comes up) the

Spoiler

most unreliable narrator ever

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Maltaran said:

Probably yes, it has (tagged as I can’t remember how early in the book this comes up) the

  Hide contents

most unreliable narrator ever

Don't sweat too many spoilers on this one with me. This Nissan the kind of story I stay up to date on discussion with regardless. When it's twisty and complicated, I find I can still enjoy and be surprised even when I'm on to something early...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Jaxom 1974 said:

Resurrecting...heh...this thread as I have finally begun a journey reading the second book...and it's kinda bonkers. Am I going to feel lost the entire time I'm reading...? 

For a large portion it is a very confusing book to read. I think it does start to make some sort of sense towards the final section (at least by the standards of the series).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/2/2023 at 8:45 AM, Jaxom 1974 said:

Resurrecting...heh...this thread as I have finally begun a journey reading the second book...and it's kinda bonkers. Am I going to feel lost the entire time I'm reading...? 

Pretty much, yes. In retrospect it's an interesting approach once you find out what's going on but it's one that I think lacked execution in such a way as it would render it an enjoyable read.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 10/2/2023 at 8:45 AM, Jaxom 1974 said:

Resurrecting...heh...this thread as I have finally begun a journey reading the second book...and it's kinda bonkers. Am I going to feel lost the entire time I'm reading...? 

I've felt this way through both books 2 and 3 and I enjoyed them, though not as much as Gideon The Ninth. Honestly, "kinda bonkers" really undersells book 2.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Always interesting to see how others relate to things.

 

I found book 3 much easier to follow than book 2. I'm still certain I missed all sorts of stuff but the too-palpable feelings of absolute confusion and consternation from book 2 were gone.

Edited by Ser Not Appearing
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Ser Not Appearing said:

I found book 3 much easier to follow than book 2. I'm still certain I missed all sorts of stuff but the too-palpable feelings of absolute confusion and consternation from book 2 were gone.

I think Nona is a lot easier to read than Harrow, although there's still plenty of weird inexplicable stuff going on. I did enjoy it more as well, although Harrow does have some great scenes in it (the dinner party is very memorable).

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Ser Not Appearing said:

Always interesting to see how others relate to things.

 

I found book 3 much easier to follow than book 2. I'm still certain I missed all sorts of stuff but the too-palpable feelings of absolute confusion and consternation from book 2 were gone.

Oh yeah, definitely, though book 3 does have a lot of "wtf is going on???" towards the very end, but maybe that's me.

Many parts of Harrow are still inexplicable to me. I get what the hell was happening but many of the finer details are blurry. Need to reread it apparently.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...