Jump to content

US Politics: Burning Down the Country


ThinkerX

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Ser Scot A Ellison said:

You know, Adam, you should try to search for the same article on the internet and link it, instead of linking the article from Facebook itself. I discovered that's why there's such a ginormous link.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Ormond said:

The National Security Advisor is a position appointed by the President to be his personal advisor and does NOT require Senate confirmation. So why should anyone be surprised someone appointed by Trump and solely beholden to him is spouting off idiocy?

Why do you think he likes people in acting roles?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Ormond said:

The National Security Advisor is a position appointed by the President to be his personal advisor and does NOT require Senate confirmation. So why should anyone be surprised someone appointed by Trump and solely beholden to him is spouting off idiocy?

I'm just thinking about what a weird string of National Security Advisers Trump has had: Michael Flynn, for 24 days, Acting Secretary Keith Kellog, for 7 days, H.R. McMaster, a real one, for 412 days, John Bolton, for 520 days (that surprised me, really?), Acting Secretary Charles Kupperman, 8 days, and now O'Brien, for 253 days already.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Tywin et al. said:

Why do you think he likes people in acting roles?

The NSA has absolutely no reason to be designated as "acting."  Or the Chief of Staff.  Why he does that?  I don't know, he still thinks he's hosting the Apprentice.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, DMC said:

The NSA has absolutely no reason to be designated as "acting."  Or the Chief of Staff.  Why he does that?  I don't know, he still thinks he's hosting the Apprentice.

That's the problem. It's still just a reality T.V. show to him. 

But that's what you get with a President who is in the WWE HoF.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Tywin et al. said:

But that's what you get with a President who is in the WWE HoF.

Hey!  There's plenty of admirable people in the WWE's Hall of Fame.  Well, some.  Well, a few.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, Fragile Bird said:

You know, Adam, you should try to search for the same article on the internet and link it, instead of linking the article from Facebook itself. I discovered that's why there's such a ginormous link.

That’s from Safari.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, ThinkerX said:

I read, linked to, and quoted what seemed to be a legit news story from a legit outlet.  Something weird is going on.

 

I'm starting to wonder - just who are these 'outside agitators' causing massive damage and inciting violence?

 

They appear to come prepared - dark clothing, weapons of sorts, even gas masks.  They're organized.  They seem camera shy.

 

ANTIFA?  My understanding is that bunch lacks this degree of organization, and their violence tends to be defensively oriented.  There may be exceptions...but...

 

Black Block or whatever they're calling themselves now?  A violently inclined anarchist group, somewhat organized, that broke a bunch of windows back in the day...but are they even around anymore?  (I'd thought them mostly a west coast thing)

 

White Supremacists of one stripe or another?  Problem here is these folks tend to be gun nuts.  If they were involved in large numbers, than at least some would be toting heat - and given their extreme hatred, probably attacking minorities among the 'legitimate' protesters.  

 

I'm almost starting to wonder if they're foreign operatives of some sort....except that's utterly ludicrous.

 

Maybe Trump or somebody connected with him is sponsoring these people - a sort of corps of agent provocateurs?  Also ludicrous.  Not to mention impossible to keep under wraps, especially with a blabbermouth like Trump.  

Whoever they are, what level of force would be legal for a citizen to use to stop them when they are seen in the act of inciting a riot?  Saw the video going around facebook of the guy with a gas mask and umbrella calmly and deliberately smashing windows while protestors asked him to stop.  My first thought on that kit was antifa( maybe that's my bias).  The white supremacists these days seem to come with more of an incel/tiki-torch vibe.   If those guys, whoever they are, happened to start being on the receiving end of a vigorous counter protest then they could be unmasked and identified.  And at least get one asshole at a time off the board until a pattern emerges. 

Not sure if it's true beyond Atlanta, but the protests and gatherings there that were arranged as strictly peaceful seemed to get suborned pretty quickly.  So there may coordination at some level there, and a lot of well intentioned people getting used cynically.

If I thought that law enforcement and or the Guard could do it without shit spirally beyond that, I'd suggest they shoot on sight any white looking person who is dressed for a riot right now.  Must be some sort of clear and present danger allowance for use of force that applies here.  Whichever side guys dressed in gas masks, hoods, and all black, who go around inciting riots are on, it's not mine.  Take them out, they're assholes and using legitimate protesters with legitimate grievances as cover.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, mcbigski said:

Whoever they are, what level of force would be legal for a citizen to use to stop them when they are seen in the act of inciting a riot?  Saw the video going around facebook of the guy with a gas mask and umbrella calmly and deliberately smashing windows while protestors asked him to stop.  My first thought on that kit was antifa( maybe that's my bias).

If his actions amount to a felony (as opposed to a misdemeanor), the people have the right to make a citizen's arrest. And if he resists this arrest, they have the right to use force in self defense.

This would apply equally if he was an undercover cop, but as we have seen, the legal system is corrupt and does not care about the law when cops are the ones breaking it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mcbigski said:

Whoever they are, what level of force would be legal for a citizen to use to stop them when they are seen in the act of inciting a riot?  Saw the video going around facebook of the guy with a gas mask and umbrella calmly and deliberately smashing windows while protestors asked him to stop.  My first thought on that kit was antifa( maybe that's my bias).  The white supremacists these days seem to come with more of an incel/tiki-torch vibe.   If those guys, whoever they are, happened to start being on the receiving end of a vigorous counter protest then they could be unmasked and identified.  And at least get one asshole at a time off the board until a pattern emerges. 

Not sure if it's true beyond Atlanta, but the protests and gatherings there that were arranged as strictly peaceful seemed to get suborned pretty quickly.  So there may coordination at some level there, and a lot of well intentioned people getting used cynically.

If I thought that law enforcement and or the Guard could do it without shit spirally beyond that, I'd suggest they shoot on sight any white looking person who is dressed for a riot right now.  Must be some sort of clear and present danger allowance for use of force that applies here.  Whichever side guys dressed in gas masks, hoods, and all black, who go around inciting riots are on, it's not mine.  Take them out, they're assholes and using legitimate protesters with legitimate grievances as cover.

I thought he looked like “black bloc” Antifa.  But it is so easy to “look” that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Ser Scot A Ellison said:

I thought he looked like “black bloc” Antifa.  But it is so easy to “look” that way.

I cannot say for sure, but the reporting here is he seems to have been a cop. From St. Paul.

And in 2008 the St. Paul police pretty clearly started and/or intensified the riots around the RNC Convention. 

No one trusts them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Tywin et al. said:

I cannot say for sure, but the reporting here is he seems to have been a cop. From St. Paul.

And in 2008 the St. Paul police pretty clearly started and/or intensified the riots around the RNC Convention. 

No one trusts them. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Tywin et al. said:

He's a cake eater. Edina scum! 

And he went to the U of MN. 

Claiming Flair for Minnesota because of the college he went to or that we worked for Gagne is insanely stupid.  If you want me to tell you why, take it to the appropriate thread.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, Tywin et al. said:

I cannot say for sure, but the reporting here is he seems to have been a cop. From St. Paul.

And in 2008 the St. Paul police pretty clearly started and/or intensified the riots around the RNC Convention. 

No one trusts them. 

Sorry for the double posts.  I’ve seen refutations and “unconfirmed” from Snopes on this allegation.  We need more proof.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Ser Scot A Ellison said:

Sorry for the double posts.  I’ve seen refutations and “unconfirmed” from Snopes on this allegation.  We need more proof.

There were significant protests during the 2008 RNC convention.  Were they more significant than the 2004 RNC convention?  Hard to say.  Point is, it was not something like the 1968 DNC.  Or anything close to it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, DMC said:

Claiming Flair for Minnesota because of the college he went to or that we worked for Gagne is insanely stupid.  If you want me to tell you why, take it to the appropriate thread.

He literally grew up here. Who cares if he washed out quickly from the university. 

Are you in a cranky mood or something? 

17 minutes ago, Ser Scot A Ellison said:

Sorry for the double posts.  I’ve seen refutations and “unconfirmed” from Snopes on this allegation.  We need more proof.

You're never going to get more proof. Not on 2008. But I did have friends just chilling at a park nearby and the cops rushed them. It was a pretty common thing to hear in the area. People at the protest swore it was a cop that broke the windows that sparked everything. And that's what it looked like with the white dude with the umbrella. 

And the world is starting to burn because we saw a video worse than Rodney King's. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tywin et al. said:

He literally grew up here.

Ric Flair is North Carolina through and through.  I grew up in Rochester, I honestly would be happy if nobody knew that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...