Jump to content

Is Tywin's role in the Red Wedding morally reprehensible?


Alyn Oakenfist

Recommended Posts

18 hours ago, SeanF said:

Northern independence was a pretty hare-brained idea.  It made an enemy out of every potential ally.

Nah the idea is fine, timing was bad. And speaking of making enemies, the House who killed the North's leaders in the worst way possible, twice, is great at that. 

Tywin's actions were the same as Joffrey's, just more calculating. It only causes people to rise up against you again. Actions like that mean alliances arent built on anything lasting. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Of course it is.

Guess right is sacred on Westeros, when he planed and allowed it to be carried under his supervision he is just as bad as the Walder and Roose.

And it is clear as day that there is a diference betwen killing someone in the battlefield and killing them in the dinner hall or even in their prison cell as we saw with Karstark.

What Tywin allowed to happen ended any kind of limit and boundry of violence.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 7/3/2020 at 5:05 PM, The Young Maester said:

As long as no westerlander soldier dies. He is probably happy as long as he gets results. 

He realised that robb was going to lose the war. 

More. Jaime knew more than that. He knew Roose was committed to betraying Robb Stark. He knew, Robb Stark must die in order for Roose to be safe. Jaime knew Roose was planning to kill Robb.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
2 hours ago, sexyprinceviserys said:

No, The Starks where the bad guys. They started a war that killed thousands.

I mean not really. War was inevitable the moment Stannis discovered the truth about the incest kids. One of the things with GRRM is that while it is clear that war is wrong, he never really blames just one side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Alyn Oakenfist said:

I mean not really. War was inevitable the moment Stannis discovered the truth about the incest kids. One of the things with GRRM is that while it is clear that war is wrong, he never really blames just one side.

Ned Stark and Robb were villain. This is why he got them killed. A villain is a hero from the other side.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Universal Sword Donor said:

I seem to recall the Mountain pillaging, burning, and murdering in the RL well before Robb called his banners

Catelyn kidnapped Tyrion, and took him to be executed.

Imagine someone kidnaps your family member. God forbid. You won’t serve them milk and cookies.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, sexyprinceviserys said:

Tywin did nothing wrong

Yes absolutely......... He did nothing without calculating the merits and demerits of his actions............ But those calculations led to him being killed by his son while taking a shit..........:D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, sexyprinceviserys said:

Ned Stark and Robb were villain. This is why he got them killed. A villain is a hero from the other side.

That's a very misunderstood comment.

Martin is absolutely not saying that there's no moral distinction to be drawn between combatants.  There are people who are rotten to the core in this story like Littlefinger, Tywin, Ser Gregor Clegane, Vargo Hoat, Ramsay Bolton, Kraznys Mo Nakloz, etc.  These are not people who are heroes from anyone's point of view.

But, relatively sympathetic characters can come into conflict with each other, such as Tyrion and Davos, at the Battle of Blackwater.  Stannis is in the right, but if he wins, there's a real risk that innocents like Sansa might be raped or murdered.  In that case, readers are invited to see the battle from more than one point of view.  Likewise, people who we might see as heroic (such as Robb, Ned, Jon, Dany) are flawed,  and some people who we might see as villainous (like Ser Jaime) can have some decent qualities. 

But, Martin is not arguing that good and evil don't exist.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Orm said:

Yes absolutely......... He did nothing without calculating the merits and demerits of his actions............ But those calculations led to him being killed by his son while taking a shit..........:D

You are right Tywin should have drowned Tyrion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 hours ago, SeanF said:

That's a very misunderstood comment.

Martin is absolutely not saying that there's no moral distinction to be drawn between combatants.  There are people who are rotten to the core in this story like Littlefinger, Tywin, Ser Gregor Clegane, Vargo Hoat, Ramsay Bolton, Kraznys Mo Nakloz, etc.  These are not people who are heroes from anyone's point of view.

But, relatively sympathetic characters can come into conflict with each other, such as Tyrion and Davos, at the Battle of Blackwater.  Stannis is in the right, but if he wins, there's a real risk that innocents like Sansa might be raped or murdered.  In that case, readers are invited to see the battle from more than one point of view.  Likewise, people who we might see as heroic (such as Robb, Ned, Jon, Dany) are flawed,  and some people who we might see as villainous (like Ser Jaime) can have some decent qualities. 

But, Martin is not arguing that good and evil don't exist.

George said a villain is a hero from the other side, so you are right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...