Jump to content

UK Politics - You can't correct a mistake, if you don't admit it was a mistake


Which Tyler

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Spockydog said:

If it wasn't so tragic it would be fucking hilarious.

 

There are unintended consequences and intended consequences. Complaining about the intended consequences is fucking hilarious. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Spockydog said:

If it wasn't so tragic it would be fucking hilarious.

 

I read that and had what may or may not be a deeply cynical reaction - the meaning of giving geographically closer nations preference actually means “keep the Poles out”.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Heartofice said:

Weatherspoons dude is a moron but being able to differentiate between controlled and uncontrolled immigration is surely the point here. 2021 and people still don’t get Brexit.

It’s hard to “get” something when so many different people think it means different things, especially when some of the people who negotiated it don’t seem to understand it (see Lord Frost’s latest comments on the Northern Ireland protocol)

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, Spockydog said:

If it wasn't so tragic it would be fucking hilarious.

 

As we keep repeating the only people more stupid than these are the rethugs right here in the numero uno for stupid USA.  But we're better because we are cantering ever more rapidly to force people to work in the restaurants for negligible no pay at gunpoint so we can eat w/o cooking and washing dishes.  They have entirely forgotten that the restaurants have long run on cheating immigrants, and they were labor short already, with tRump's closing of borders, deportation, etc.  So what is left but literally coercing labor like they did in the good old days with servers mass forced to bring us beer by violence. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Fragile Bird said:

I read that and had what may or may not be a deeply cynical reaction - the meaning of giving geographically closer nations preference actually means “keep the Poles out”.

I think the Poles are a bit more acceptable, because they basically look like us and fix things for cheap. The real danger, according to Farage, was the Albanians and Romanians, who were going to move in next door and put donkeys in their front gardens. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Heartofice said:

Weatherspoons dude is a moron but being able to differentiate between controlled and uncontrolled immigration is surely the point here. 2021 and people still don’t get Brexit.

Not sure barstaff at shitterspoons are exactly the highly qualified immigrants we were told the government wanted.

Might as well have kept the original freedom of movement since there were already controls that the government just couldnt be arsed to enforce

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Maltaran said:

It’s hard to “get” something when so many different people think it means different things, especially when some of the people who negotiated it don’t seem to understand it (see Lord Frost’s latest comments on the Northern Ireland protocol)

Think control of our own immigration policy was well understood 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Meghan and Harry are so full of shit. There is no such thing as institutional racism in the royal family. Oh no. Definitely not. Nothing to see here, move along. 

Buckingham Palace banned ethnic minorities from office roles, papers reveal

Quote

The Queen’s courtiers banned “coloured immigrants or foreigners” from serving in clerical roles in the royal household until at least the late 1960s, according to newly discovered documents that will reignite the debate over the British royal family and race.

The documents also shed light on how Buckingham Palace negotiated controversial clauses – that remain in place to this day – exempting the Queen and her household from laws that prevent race and sex discrimination.

The papers were discovered at the National Archives as part of the Guardian’s ongoing investigation into the royal family’s use of an arcane parliamentary procedure, known as Queen’s consent, to secretly influence the content of British laws.

They reveal how in 1968, the Queen’s chief financial manager informed civil servants that “it was not, in fact, the practice to appoint coloured immigrants or foreigners” to clerical roles in the royal household, although they were permitted to work as domestic servants.

It is unclear when the practice ended. Buckingham Palace refused to answer questions about the ban and when it was revoked.

So, probably still in place today. 

This will likely not be reported anywhere other than the Guardian. Can you imagine the noise if the BBC was exposed for having such a policy?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Spockydog said:

Meghan and Harry are so full of shit. There is no such thing as institutional racism in the royal family. Oh no. Definitely not. Nothing to see here, move along. 

Buckingham Palace banned ethnic minorities from office roles, papers reveal

So, probably still in place today. 

This will likely not be reported anywhere other than the Guardian. Can you imagine the noise if the BBC was exposed for having such a policy?

The article says that the practice had ended at least from the 90s

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Heartofice said:

The article says that the practice had ended at least from the 90s

*trumpet blast* Pwarp pwar pwar pwarp.

RACISTS NEED DEFENDING. RACISTS NEED DEFENDING. 

 

The article actually says it is unclear when the practice ended because the palace refused to discuss it. 

The article also says that the Palace said their records show ethnic minorities being employed in the 90s.

Nobody else has seen these 'records'. So here's an idea - let's just take them at their word, shall we. As has been repeatedly demonstrated, the Royals are the paragons of honesty and integrity. Not a paedo or racist amongst them. 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Spockydog said:

The article actually says it is unclear when the practice ended because the palace refused to discuss it. 

The article also says that the Palace said their records show ethnic minorities being employed in the 90s.

Nobody else has seen these 'records'. So here's an idea - let's just take them at their word, shall we. As has been repeatedly demonstrated, the Royals are the paragons of honesty and integrity. Not a paedo or racist amongst them. 

 

 

One person from Northern Ireland and one person from Wales?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Spockydog said:

*trumpet blast* Pwarp pwar pwar pwarp.

RACISTS NEED DEFENDING. RACISTS NEED DEFENDING. 

 

The article actually says it is unclear when the practice ended because the palace refused to discuss it. 

The article also says that the Palace said their records show ethnic minorities being employed in the 90s.

Nobody else has seen these 'records'. So here's an idea - let's just take them at their word, shall we. As has been repeatedly demonstrated, the Royals are the paragons of honesty and integrity. Not a paedo or racist amongst them. 

 

 

Well at least we agree that Harry and Megan are full of shit.:P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...