Jump to content

"The Others take him" Who are The Others?


Falcon2909

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Tucu said:

I like the little threads that GRRM leaves in the legends. If a wildling lays with an Other, is the half-human child still an Other?

If the Others are demons made of ice and snow as Stannis says here:

who was Sam praying to before the WW showed up:

He prayed to the gods of the snows (or demons too) and a demon made of snow and ice showed up.

I always saw these types of lines as a quite literal attempt at othering, like how nan describes wildings as beasts more than men. Mel does have a predilection to call all other gods demons, and if the temple of r'hllor is based on Zoroastrianism its not exactly strange for her to espouse such given the dogma of the religion. rather than demons I think their supposed to be some aes sídhe / fairy species similar to the children and their brothers the giants. 

death is often referred to as a mercy as well, so it seems Sams prayer is being answered in a way.

demon though is an interesting term and brings up an essential question, are the others evil? they seem to have laws and intelligence at least given their relation with craster. so far they have mostly just chased the wildlings and watch out of the north of the wall, which may be justified. the attack on Mormont inside the wall however...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, Targaryeninkingslanding said:

I always saw these types of lines as a quite literal attempt at othering, like how nan describes wildings as beasts more than men. Mel does have a predilection to call all other gods demons, and if the temple of r'hllor is based on Zoroastrianism its not exactly strange for her to espouse such given the dogma of the religion. rather than demons I think their supposed to be some aes sídhe / fairy species similar to the children and their brothers the giants. 

death is often referred to as a mercy as well, so it seems Sams prayer is being answered in a way.

demon though is an interesting term and brings up an essential question, are the others evil? they seem to have laws and intelligence at least given their relation with craster. so far they have mostly just chased the wildlings and watch out of the north of the wall, which may be justified. the attack on Mormont inside the wall however...

 

36 minutes ago, Aejohn the Conqueroo said:

Great passage. He specifically prayed for 'mercy' and an other showed up to kill him - or as an FM may say, grant him the gift of mercy.

My take is also that Sam prayed for the gift of mercy. The passage continues with this before getting into the flashback of the fight in the Fist:

Quote

Maslyn screamed for mercy. Why had he suddenly remembered that? It was nothing he wanted to remember.

Getting into the question if they are evil; without knowing who they are and what actions were theirs I can't tell.  As Targaryeninkingslanding mentioned, the legend of the Others is probably a process of othering; groups of beings were isolated and attributed all the worst evils of mankind. For example we have seen that the Weeper takes people's eyes, Ramsay hunts maids through frozen forests, we have seen necromancy-like magic done by Thoros of Myr, Qyburn and in some ways the FM.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Daenerysthegreat said:

Now that's intresting. I'm wondering if I keep writing posts like this maybe the author will let me write a few books in the universe

Elio and and Linda's job was to go through GRRM's books and notes, compile all this information and point out things which had to be fleshed out (and then GRRM himself wrote more stuff). In a few cases they came up with some own thoughts and proposed them to GRRM, who then decided to go with it or not. So GRRM won't let you "write a few books in the universe" for sure, but if you manage to convince him that you are a two-legged Ice and Fire encyclopaedia, he may allow you to write down the stuff he comes up with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 hours ago, Megorova said:

@John Suburbs I see a reason why the wights/zombies/corpses could be called white walkers, though why the Others are referred with that term -_- weird. Because they are riding ice-spiders or dead horses, they're not walking :) so they shouldn't be walkers, white or otherwise.

They walk too. Or more precisely, they glide across the top of the snow. Frankly, I don't see why they would want to ride dead horses, since that just slows them down. And we have yet to see these ice spiders or anything even remotely similar.

Sorry, but I don't think there is any reason for humans to call a wight anything other than a wight. They are dead humans reanimated, which is a wight. The Others, however, are unknown, so it's logical that they would be called by many different names, Others, wight walkers, cold gods, white shadows . . .

And Ran pretty much settled the argument, yes?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think the words had to be changed for the HBO show.  "Other" is a common word; and when you're listening to dialog, you can't hear the capital "O."  And "wight" sounds the same as "white."  So these names that worked fine in the books would have been confusing on TV. So D&D went with "white walkers" as a generic term for both types of  villains, and didn't really spell out the difference between them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This is further proof that the White Walkers accept the offering of babies from humans. YouTube celebrity Preston Jacobs proposed that one of the gates at the wall served as a passage through to the other side. Undesired babies are taken through and left for the White Walkers to take.

Just who are these inconvenient babies? The high lords like Tywin and Walder do not leave unwanted children out to die. Are these bastards of lords who the married peasant couple do not want? Northern lords doing the right of the first night to every bride would produce babies. The peasant fathers resent this baby. They are not going to get excited about raising and supporting this baby. The socially accepted way in the north is to leave the baby at the other side of the wall and let nature take its course. They have a system in place to deal with the issue of unwanted noble bastards. It would create an awkward family without this system.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

53 minutes ago, Moiraine Sedai said:

This is further proof that the White Walkers accept the offering of babies from humans. YouTube celebrity Preston Jacobs proposed that one of the gates at the wall served as a passage through to the other side. Undesired babies are taken through and left for the White Walkers to take.

Cool. Where's the further proof you're talking about though?  you can't mean PG's theory is proof, can you?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Aejohn the Conqueroo said:

Cool. Where's the further proof you're talking about though?  you can't mean PG's theory is proof, can you?

Preston Jacobs.  We know the Others were taking Craster’s boys. We have Gilly’s word. 
There is no proof of a “bastard gate” at the wall. But it would mean a gate or an underground passage is needed to get the baby to the opposite side. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

×
×
  • Create New...