Nathan Stark Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 1 hour ago, Odej said: He seems to lose consciousness the moment he was hit by the fourth time. He may have just passed out instead of dying, but we don't know if the blows stopped there. Hm, I don't know. To be honest, I think the possibility that he was only injured would be an act of cowardice on the part of the writer. I would argue killing Jon, only to ressurect him, would be an act of authorial cowardice. Especially since we already have another pov brought back from the dead. If you kill a popular character off, it should mean something. Jon dying, and then coming back, makes his death rather pointless. Morte and TheNecromancerofMirkwood 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odej Posted January 9 Author Share Posted January 9 18 minutes ago, Apoplexy said: Why do you say its bad writing if Jon was just injured? Getting life threatening wounds, but surviving them seems just like a cliffhanger put in for dramatic effect and to keep the readers hooked. For a number of reasons, but the main one is: Martin has complained more than once about how common in fiction it is for characters to be often placed in life-threatening situations, but we never really fear for them because they are heroes and heroes always get saved. He wants his story to be different, he wants us to fear for his characters, and he wants his characters suffer the consequences for their actions. Even if Martin doesn't always do it - cough cough Tyrion cough cough. And while leaving a seriously injured character at the end of a play to continue to reveal that he survived is a recurring cliffhanger, he's not always consistent. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odej Posted January 9 Author Share Posted January 9 (edited) 1 hour ago, Nathan Stark said: I would argue killing Jon, only to ressurect him, would be an act of authorial cowardice. Especially since we already have another pov brought back from the dead. If you kill a popular character off, it should mean something. Jon dying, and then coming back, makes his death rather pointless. If he were to be resurrected and go back to exactly the way he was before I would agree with you, but the way Martin brought another character back from the dead is precisely why, for me, Jon's return it's a good choice. Catelyn was completely changed in character when she was resurrected, her role in the story has changed drastically and this is a possibility that I find very interesting to apply to Jon. Jon dealing with the chaos that must reign on the Wall after his death, the succession crisis of Winterfell, his true origin, Daenerys and the threat of the Others with the tormented mind of someone who has passed through death and returned is something that makes me very excited for the next book. Martin said The Winds of Winter will have a lot of dark chapters, Jon should be one of the characters that should provide that. I know to many readers this reasons aren't enough, but I loved. Edited January 9 by Odej Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apoplexy Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 (edited) 28 minutes ago, Odej said: For a number of reasons, but the main one is: Martin has complained more than once about how common in fiction it is for characters to be often placed in life-threatening situations, but we never really fear for them because they are heroes and heroes always get saved. He wants his story to be different, he wants us to fear for his characters, and he wants his characters suffer the consequences for their actions. Even if Martin doesn't always do it - cough cough Tyrion cough cough. And while leaving a seriously injured character at the end of a play to continue to reveal that he survived is a recurring cliffhanger, he's not always consistent. I dunno, we have had a lot of characters die with no return, catelyn and beric have already been resurrected. Jon just being injured would be a refreshing change. And I agree about tyrion. Edited January 9 by Apoplexy Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odej Posted January 9 Author Share Posted January 9 (edited) 1 hour ago, Apoplexy said: Jon just being injured would be a refreshing change. I don't think so, I mentioned Tyrion because it happens to him constantly, but asoiaf isn't strange to put characters in likely death situations in which they left only injuried. Brienne, Theon, Asha, Sandor, Jon himself, Sam, are some examples. It's happens a lot with Arya too, and her case it's as bad as Tyrion, or worst, since she is child. The things she went through in ACOK... Edited January 9 by Odej Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corvo the Crow Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 (edited) Of course not. Tormund will donate a third of his member and then Bran will warg into Jon and guide his long spear for a tilt because he is a good jouster as proven by warged Howland beating three knights. This is known. Edited January 9 by Corvo the Crow Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Phylum of Alexandria Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 Vigor mortis. Daeron the Daring 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Damsel in Distress Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 Wights do not reproduce. An erection is useless in their case. Also, the blood stops flowing within the body. Now, if he died with an erection? The stiffy will be permanent. I will have to agree with Lord Of The Crossing. Ghost-Jon and Nym-Arya will eventually mate and have cubs. Darth Sidious 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darryk Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 Laughed almost as hard as when I saw "Sansa: Portrait of a psychopath" thread title. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Lannister Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 9 minutes ago, Darryk said: Laughed almost as hard as when I saw "Sansa: Portrait of a psychopath" thread title. Oh my. I missed that gem. Jaenara Belarys and Darryk 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Apoplexy Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 12 hours ago, Odej said: I don't think so, I mentioned Tyrion because it happens to him constantly, but asoiaf isn't strange to put characters in likely death situations in which they left only injuried. Brienne, Theon, Asha, Sandor, Jon himself, Sam, are some examples. It's happens a lot with Arya too, and her case it's as bad as Tyrion, or worst, since she is child. The things she went through in ACOK... Westeros is portrayed as an extremely dangerous place, especially during war times. So characters will require some plot armor to survive, otherwise everyone will likely be dead unless in an extremely safe situation. For me, having characters be wounded and not dead doesn't seem that jarring. But not dying from your wounds seems mundane to me, having too many resurrected characters seems convenient. As for Arya, yeah it's terrible. I am hoping the toll it takes on her psyche will be addressed. Morte and EggBlue 2 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
EggBlue Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 24 minutes ago, Darryk said: Laughed almost as hard as when I saw "Sansa: Portrait of a psychopath" thread title. that's actually a thread?.. why can't I find it?!!!! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Odej Posted January 9 Author Share Posted January 9 27 minutes ago, EggBlue said: that's actually a thread?.. why can't I find it?!!!! https://asoiaf.westeros.org/index.php?/topic/77107-sansa-stark-a-portrait-of-a-psychopath/ EggBlue 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Raven Princling Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 I cannot stop laughing! Thank you so much! This made my day better! Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaenara Belarys Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 4 hours ago, Lord Lannister said: Oh my. I missed that gem. And I thought that the Stark Hate group a a relatively "recent" phenomenon. Look at me, I look like Chandler and Karl on Mr. Beast's channel. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lord Lannister Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 19 minutes ago, Jaenara Belarys said: And I thought that the Stark Hate group a a relatively "recent" phenomenon. Look at me, I look like Chandler and Karl on Mr. Beast's channel. I guess "haters gonna hate" may as well be ancient wisdom at this point. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nathan Stark Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 1 hour ago, Jaenara Belarys said: And I thought that the Stark Hate group a a relatively "recent" phenomenon. Look at me, I look like Chandler and Karl on Mr. Beast's channel. 57 minutes ago, Lord Lannister said: I guess "haters gonna hate" may as well be ancient wisdom at this point. I remember the "Sansa: Portrait of a psycopath" thread from way back when. Sansa and Catelyn have always been divisive characters. I guess people just don't like redheads? At that time thoigh, I remember it was Danaerys who was constantly getting hated on, more than anyone else. I didn't love that any more than the endless Stark hate these days. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaenara Belarys Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 1 hour ago, Nathan Stark said: I remember the "Sansa: Portrait of a psycopath" thread from way back when. Sansa and Catelyn have always been divisive characters. I guess people just don't like redheads? I prefer my blonds before my redheads. 1 hour ago, Nathan Stark said: At that time thoigh, I remember it was Danaerys who was constantly getting hated on, more than anyone else. I didn't love that any more than the endless Stark hate these days. Well, that don't sound nice. Were the Dany haters similar to our modern Stark haters? Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jaenara Belarys Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 (edited) On 1/8/2022 at 3:42 PM, Apoplexy said: Maybe its really about cocks in the end.. sigh.. Going by that logic, Dany'll lose if she fights a battle with an army of "Men without Cocks." Edited January 10 by Jaenara Belarys Apoplexy, Lord Lannister and EggBlue 3 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Falcon2909 Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 He'll probably fuck through Ghost (like varvmyr did with his pets) BlackLightning 1 Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.