Jump to content

Ukraine: Holding


Ser Scot A Ellison

Recommended Posts

31 minutes ago, A Horse Named Stranger said:

No good would come out of this.

If they have any sense, they will destroy it and share the video of its destruction. 

  • t would show Russia did indeed deploy those
  • Russia couldn'T claim it was used against them as pretext to further escalate things and unleash whatever they could come up with.

Will Isildur have the good sense to destroy the bloody ring? Thus far Ukraine have acted in a way, that they might very well be able to do that.

Could they replace the thermobaric missiles with other missiles and just use it against Russian artillery and tanks?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Corvinus85 said:

Could they replace the thermobaric missiles with other missiles and just use it against Russian artillery and tanks?

Good question. I've no idea. Also no idea if this kind of equipment requires some sort of passcode or key that the Russians presumably would've taken with them (although you'd think they wouldn't abandon a thing like this either).

21 minutes ago, Ser Scot A Ellison said:

I hope they don’t.  The world sees Ukraine as the underdog and the victim, with good cause.  If they use a captured TOS-1A… that will slip.

While true, there is a difference between attacking military and civilian targets, even with a weapon like this. If Ukraine used it only against a Russian military target, they'd still have the relative moral high ground in my mind.

Now if Ukraine started infiltrating saboteurs into Russian cities to blowup metro stations and whatnot, that'd be a different story. But that's not what anyone's talking about.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Fragile Bird said:

Anyone who supports Putin is dead to me.

Tell me, how can I blame my Armenian friend for being ambiguous about the Russian side when a strong Russia is the only thing that might prevent a possible genocide in her country? The West did nothing to stop Azerbaijan during the last war or to pressure Turkey regarding the arms supplies, possibly just to get Russia bogged down there. Now Russia has forced them into alliances, but hatred runs deep between the Azeri and Armenians and if big powers look the other way, things will get bad. Really bad.

Notice, she believes that Russian invasion is a mistake, a big mistake, but she is terribly afraid what it could mean for her country in the future.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Maithanet said:

10% killed/wounded/surrendered/fled would be 20k troops, and I haven't seen anything close to that even from Ukrainian sources (which have an incentive to inflate numbers).  Even 5% casualties in the first week feels implausible.  While I agree there is strong evidence that Russian morale is low and some desertion is occurring, it is very hard to know how common that is. 

Yeah I agree that if depletion/attrition was actually anywhere around even 10k troops we'd be hearing much more about it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, rotting sea cow said:

Tell me, how can I blame my Armenian friend for being ambiguous about the Russian side when a strong Russia is the only thing that might prevent a possible genocide in her country? The West did nothing to stop Azerbaijan during the last war or to pressure Turkey regarding the arms supplies, possibly just to get Russia bogged down there. Now Russia has forced them into alliances, but hatred runs deep between the Azeri and Armenians and if big powers look the other way, things will get bad. Really bad.

Notice, she believes that Russian invasion is a mistake, a big mistake, but she is terribly afraid what it could mean for her country in the future.

The last war. 

Not to derail that thread, however. Armenia held onto a part of Azerbaijan, that they were basically occupying. Usually, I have a quite bit more sympathy for Armenia than I have for Azerbaijan, but there the Azeris basically beat back occupiers. Yes, it was an area were the population was pre-dominantly Armenian, but it was not Armenia.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, A Horse Named Stranger said:

Not to derail that thread, however. Armenia held onto a part of Azerbaijan, that they were basically occupying. Usually, I have a quite bit more sympathy for Armenia than I have for Azerbaijan, but there they basically beat back occupiers. Yes, it was an area were the population was pre-dominantly Armenian, but it was not Armenia.

It's not my intention to discuss the truth of the claims. Just state a reality. I come from the New World, a region where these old unsettled problems do not exist or certainly not a this level. For me is both fascinating and terrifying.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, HoodedCrow said:

Pat Robertson, who seems to be still alive, has said that God made Putin do it, to promote End Times. 

Tell old Pat:

“But of that day and hour no one knows, not even the angels of heaven, but My Father only.” Matthew 24:36.  
 

Evangelical christians who push eschatological predictions always skip that.  They also forget that people have been claiming “we are in the end times” for the entire 2000 years that Christian eschatology has existed.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

46 minutes ago, Maithanet said:

10% killed/wounded/surrendered/fled would be 20k troops, and I haven't seen anything close to that even from Ukrainian sources (which have an incentive to inflate numbers).  Even 5% casualties in the first week feels implausible.  While I agree there is strong evidence that Russian morale is low and some desertion is occurring, it is very hard to know how common that is. 

According to a military friend of mine, usually the ratio of wounded to killed in a combat scenario is around 4 or 5 to 1, so if we are to believe that over 5,000 Russian troops have died thus far, it's conceivable that the number of killed and wounded combined could be in the 20 to 25 thousand range, and that's not accounting for those who have been captured or deserted. 

And I think we can probably all agree that Russia won't be releasing any sort of numbers confirming these things.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Varysblackfyre321 said:

Hey maybe this end times prediction will be right.

Considering Robertson has been making it for - at least - as long as I can remember (so about 25 years), I don't think that'd count as a correct prediction.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

This [specifically but not exclusively the last] makes my blood boil. Like, incandescent rage. I'm jumping offline for a bit before I lose my shit. 

Fuck Putin in the head, with a stick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

4 minutes ago, DMC said:

Considering Robertson has been making it for - at least - as long as I can remember (so about 25 years), I don't think that'd count as a correct prediction.

That black-hearted fuckface will face his own end-times soon. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Interesting thread suggesting that Russian communications are a shambles, using analog, unencrypted radios -- sometimes even (allegedly) a civilian radio -- to communicate, and that pretty much anyone can listen in:

They have some clips of recordings from the past days, one of them (allegedly) indicating that one battle outside Kyiv left at least 200 Russians dead. See here for what appears to have been a live translation as it was being monitored on Reddit.

I suspect this sort of signal monitoring is part of why we have the various figures we have for destroyed vehicles and so on -- they're literally letting the Russians tell them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...