Jump to content

Football: Heartening Developments


polishgenius

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Tywin et al. said:

Or basically every large club that preceded them? 

No. Because other big clubs got wealthy by being successful, not the other way round. They had history. 20 years ago you would struggle to say Chelsea were a top 10 historical club, 10-12 at best. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, BigFatCoward said:

No. Because other big clubs got wealthy by being successful, not the other way round. They had history. 20 years ago you would struggle to say Chelsea were a top 10 historical club, 10-12 at best. 

Riiight. So old money is good, new money is bad. Got it! 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Tywin et al. said:

Riiight. So old money is good, new money is bad. Got it! 

Old money is better than corrupt russian oligarch money certainly. 

If they had been taken over by a local lad done good like Blackburn and won shit, nobody would care as much. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BigFatCoward said:

Old money is better than corrupt russian oligarch money certainly. 

The old money is from corrupt Western European oligarchs, buddy. Or Job Creators as they're called here in the states. 

And why are we haggling about who is more corrupt when we're discussing things under the umbrella of FIFA? The entire fucking thing is corrupt. 

Officer, get on that!!! :P

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's really disappointing that City will likely win the PL even though they have not a single player in the top 5 for either goals scored or assists.What a team!

Here's a crazy stat , we have 3 players in the top 4 for goals scored:

1.Salah (20)

2.Jota (14)

4.Mane (12)

We also have 3 players in top 4 for assists:

1. TAA (11)

2.Robertson (10)

3. Salah (10)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...