Secretary of Eumenes Posted August 3, 2022 Share Posted August 3, 2022 3 minutes ago, briantw said: I mean, sure, there are plenty of reasons to be critical of the Browns, but I think evidence shows that they would have given that same sort of contract structure to Watson had he not been accused of anything, as they would have with any QB they signed or traded for. If Baker had been extended, the contract certainly would have looked similar (albeit probably for a lot less money). The same is true if they had been able to trade for Russ like they tried to, or if Rodgers had become available and they had landed him. That's basically exactly the structure of the extension that Rodgers actually got. They put special language in his contract that prevents his guarantees from being voided (as is standard in NFL deals) if he is suspended. That language ain't in Rodgers' extension. Quote Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Join the conversation
You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.