Jump to content

US Politics: Fate of congress hangs in the Ballots


A Horse Named Stranger

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, Gorn said:

What is the context? The quoted sentence, by itself, is a factually correct statement.

The problem is that the peoples who came were also constantly at war with each other.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Ser Scot A Ellison said:

Is Palin attempting to claim victory in Alaska?

I mean, she complains in the video that we might not know the results until Thanksgiving.  Looking it up, she clarified in a press release that she's "anticipating" victory.  Which..is fine.  So now I'm pretty pissed at you, Scot, for making me watch a 2 minute video of Sarah Palin.  Although I did like how she referred to Alaska as the "Fort Knox of America" in regards to energy resources.  Where does she think Fort Knox is?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Maithanet said:

Looks like boebert is gonna hang on.  Big drop from the more democratic part of the district was apparently election day votes, and increased her lead.  Now she's up 1200 votes.  :angry::bawl:

It was fun while it lasted, tho.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, A Horse Named Stranger said:

It was fun while it lasted, tho.

Perhaps it will lead to a primary challenge for a more conventional, less terrible Republican.  Like with cawthorn.  We can hope anyway.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Maithanet said:

Looks like boebert is gonna hang on.  Big drop from the more democratic part of the district was apparently election day votes, and increased her lead.  Now she's up 1200 votes.  :angry::bawl:

Be interesting to see if she can avoid the 0.5% automatic trigger.  Looks like there's about 320 thousand total votes, so right now that'd be >1600 votes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Zorral said:

This run of "success" raised the profile of right-wing pollsters and caused the media to become less skeptical. The New York Times noted that while traditional media organizations cut back on the number of polls they commissioned, "there has been a wave of polls by firms like the Trafalgar Group, Rasmussen Reports, Insider Advantage and others that have tended to produce much more Republican-friendly results than the traditional pollsters." These Republican pollsters do not "adhere to industry standards for transparency or data collection." 

This is true and I'll get to it in a second, but I think it's important to emphasize - because there does seem to be a lot of whining about polling again (shocker!) - that the polls, on average, weren't that bad.  Can't tell for sure yet obviously, but it appears it will be another average polling error.  It's just the error went the Dems' way, which after 2016 and 2020 many people mistakenly believed wasn't possible.  Moreover, the "traditional" polls actually did really fucking well this cycle.  So, hopefully that's a lesson.

Now, it is true that traditional, "Grade A" pollsters produced far fewer rounds than previous cycles - and that vacuum was filled by your Trafalgars and Insider Advantages flooding the dataset.  Silver poo-pooed this being a problem on Monday (I think) because 538's model accounts for the pollsters' bias.  And he's right!  The model should correct for this - that's the point of constructing a sophisticated model.  But it's pretty clear his model failed to do so, at least not to the extent it should.  And more importantly, it's very difficult to do so when you're getting so many more data points from these rather nakedly partisan firms.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Corvinus85 said:

My answer to that was "Must you ask?"

Citizenship question number two I hope you answered correctly: When did The Simpsons stop being a great show?

Let DHS deal with that nightmare. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, DMC said:

So Clark County revised the amount of outstanding ballots from 70k to 50k.  That's..gonna make it much harder for Cortez Masto to make up the margin there.

Actually, it sounds like what the county clerk meant was that there 50k uncounted ballots, and that there's another 20k-ish ballots that have been counted but haven't been reported yet.

Meanwhile, in AZ, there was another good drop from Pima county (and importantly has about 140k more ballots to still report)

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I got ninja'd, because I was just about to post that tweet from Ralston. Boy what a mess this post-election counting is turning out to be for Nevada.

Regarding Arizona, it still looks like Kelly will pull it off. 

Maybe I should just have frozen myself too at 4 AM EST on 11/9 and stopped looking at updates, instead trusting the Needle hybrid projection to be gospel rather than subject myself to this slow torture.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, Fez said:

Actually, it sounds like what the county clerk meant was that there 50k uncounted ballots, and that there's another 20k-ish ballots that have been counted but haven't been reported yet.

...Ok, so Kornacki is saying now he's assuming the 26k was counting what was released last night and just now - just under 12 thousand - combined.  Leaving 56k votes from Clark.

Anyway, the just released votes saw 61/34 split to cut the lead to 12,671.  If all that is true, it's gonna be very, very close.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...