Rhom Posted January 9, 2023 Author Share Posted January 9, 2023 2 minutes ago, Tywin et al. said: Even if they lose their first playoff game, which is still TBD because the Seahawks are now in OT, don't you have to start him given this run? Lance has shown you nothing so far. Not sure you can be that dismissive. Three firsts for a QB that might never do anything for you? That's pretty tough, especially when, *lowers voice*, I tried to tell you almost any QB would be good on your team. Like even Zach Wilson or Sam Darnold. That's how QB friendly the system is. Also why I wouldn't trade for Jimmy, no matter how beautiful his smile is. CJ Beathard disagrees with your assessment. Yes, it’s the best possible place for a rookie QB, but there’s a reason only Jimmy had had a winning record with Shanny the Younger. Playing QB in the NFL is hard no matter where you are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMC Posted January 9, 2023 Share Posted January 9, 2023 3 minutes ago, Tywin et al. said: Even if they lose their first playoff game, which is still TBD because the Seahawks are now in OT, don't you have to start him given this run? Lance has shown you nothing so far. If they lose against the 7th seed no, I don't think you have to start him at all. It's up to Shanahan. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Chatywin et al. Posted January 9, 2023 Share Posted January 9, 2023 7 minutes ago, Rhom said: CJ Beathard disagrees with your assessment. Yes, it’s the best possible place for a rookie QB, but there’s a reason only Jimmy had had a winning record with Shanny the Younger. Playing QB in the NFL is hard no matter where you are. Jimmy isn't that good though. 7 minutes ago, DMC said: If they lose against the 7th seed no, I don't think you have to start him at all. It's up to Shanahan. But if he plays really well in a loss? Idk how you just give the keys back to Lance. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Chatywin et al. Posted January 9, 2023 Share Posted January 9, 2023 LET'S GO LIONS!!!! It sucks that they're eliminated, of the three teams left alive they were the most deserving, but go fuck up the Packers season anyways!!!!!!! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMC Posted January 9, 2023 Share Posted January 9, 2023 Just now, Tywin et al. said: But if he plays really well in a loss? Idk how you just give the keys back to Lance. I don't think you "just give him the keys back" either, but you give him the chance to win it in camp. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhom Posted January 9, 2023 Author Share Posted January 9, 2023 2 minutes ago, Tywin et al. said: But if he plays really well in a loss? Idk how you just give the keys back to Lance. There’s a difference in “giving the keys back” and holding a competition. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhom Posted January 9, 2023 Author Share Posted January 9, 2023 Sounds crazy, but I’d much rather face A-A-Ron and the Packers rather than round three with Geno the Jets Reject and the Seachickens. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DireWolfSpirit Posted January 9, 2023 Share Posted January 9, 2023 Yep with the Seahawks win the Lions will not get a WC slot. Still a chance to deny the Dirty Packers if they can topple SlackerRodgers. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMC Posted January 9, 2023 Share Posted January 9, 2023 1 minute ago, Rhom said: Sounds crazy, but I’d much rather face A-A-Ron and the Packers rather than round three with Geno the Jets Reject and the Seachickens. Absolutely. And not just because it'd be fun to kick the shit out of Rodgers in the playoffs again. Never want to play a team three times. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Chatywin et al. Posted January 9, 2023 Share Posted January 9, 2023 Time for a playoff themed thread. And don't think I haven't multi-quoted you bastards. I just need to make dinner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMC Posted January 9, 2023 Share Posted January 9, 2023 I also think we should give Purdy his due. He adds a dimension simply not available with Garoppolo - his scrambling and pocket presence that allows him to extend plays (and, conversely, limit the amount of stupid throws Garoppolo would make and instead take sacks or run out of it). A lot of his biggest throws so far have been on broken plays, and that's obviously not because of Shanahan. It does, however, certainly have something to do with throwing to perhaps the best group of skill position players in football. Albeit Deebo was out for much of it. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhom Posted January 9, 2023 Author Share Posted January 9, 2023 27 minutes ago, DMC said: I also think we should give Purdy his due. He adds a dimension simply not available with Garoppolo - his scrambling and pocket presence that allows him to extend plays (and, conversely, limit the amount of stupid throws Garoppolo would make and instead take sacks or run out of it). A lot of his biggest throws so far have been on broken plays, and that's obviously not because of Shanahan. It does, however, certainly have something to do with throwing to perhaps the best group of skill position players in football. Albeit Deebo was out for much of it. He really seems to have made Aiyuk a favorite security blanket. I think that has really helped Aiyuk’s development too. Jimmy just didn’t look his way the same way Purdy does. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMC Posted January 9, 2023 Share Posted January 9, 2023 2 minutes ago, Rhom said: He really seems to have made Aiyuk a favorite security blanket. I think that has really helped Aiyuk’s development too. Jimmy just didn’t look his way the same way Purdy does. Yeah. Kittle, too, has more consistently been a factor. Again, some of that has to do with Deebo being out though. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mcbigski Posted January 9, 2023 Share Posted January 9, 2023 2 hours ago, Tywin et al. said: Do you make him your starter next year? Because if not, that's one of the worst trades of all time. This one time, at the draft, Chicago over paid and traded up one spot so they didn't have to settle for Mahomes over Trubisky. Really how can you ever beat that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMC Posted January 9, 2023 Share Posted January 9, 2023 There's also the Tunsil trade. And the Wilson trade looks pretty horrible. Then there's the Gobert trade...whoops wrong sport. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Chatywin et al. Posted January 9, 2023 Share Posted January 9, 2023 1 hour ago, DMC said: I don't think you "just give him the keys back" either, but you give him the chance to win it in camp. 1 hour ago, Rhom said: There’s a difference in “giving the keys back” and holding a competition. You two good setting four first round picks on fire? 1 hour ago, Rhom said: Sounds crazy, but I’d much rather face A-A-Ron and the Packers rather than round three with Geno the Jets Reject and the Seachickens. Yeah, that is crazy. 6 minutes ago, mcbigski said: This one time, at the draft, Chicago over paid and traded up one spot so they didn't have to settle for Mahomes over Trubisky. Really how can you ever beat that? I would have take Watson first TBH. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jace, Extat Posted January 9, 2023 Share Posted January 9, 2023 Nah. The Japanese sank some outmoded deep-sea fishing equipment and by way of butterfly-effect skullfucked Hitler Trading (was it a 3rd and a 5th?) up 1 spot or whatever to select Mitch 'NVP' Trubisky like ten spots ahead of Swaggs Mahomes will live in infamy. ETA: syntax Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMC Posted January 9, 2023 Share Posted January 9, 2023 11 minutes ago, Tywin et al. said: You two good setting four first round picks on fire? Well, first of all it was three. And one was just moving up to get Lance. I was ambivalent about giving up that much at the time, but you were the one that all gung-ho. Anyway, ShanaLynch were also just making the estimation that they'd be late round picks. Last year's pick was the 29th - the Pats used it on Cole Strange. Their original pick in 2021 was Micah Parsons, but the Niners weren't gonna draft him anyway. It probably would have been Mac Jones. This year's pick will almost certainly be in the late 20s as well. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMC Posted January 9, 2023 Share Posted January 9, 2023 18 minutes ago, BBB Jacelyn said: Trading (was it a 3rd and a 5th?) up 1 spot or whatever to select Mitch 'NVP' Trubisky like ten spots ahead of Swaggs Mahomes will live in infamy. It was two 3rds and a 4th. One of the 3rds turned into Fred Warner. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mr. Chatywin et al. Posted January 9, 2023 Share Posted January 9, 2023 2 minutes ago, DMC said: Well, first of all it was three. And one was just moving up to get Lance. I was ambivalent about giving up that much at the time, but you were the one that all gung-ho. It was three and the one you used... And I was gung-ho about this? When? Quote Their original pick in 2021 was Micah Parsons, but the Niners weren't gonna draft him anyway. It probably would have been Mac Jones. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.