Tywin et al. Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 8 minutes ago, Mexal said: I hate the NFL so much. Because of the NFL being fucktards to the Bengals and treating them differently than every other team, they're still playing starters in a game that is mostly meaingless and as such, they just lost their starting RG. Once again, they have no players left on the right side of the OL going into the playoffs. Big big problem. Be a brave cat! Ferrum Aeternum 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramsay B. Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 2 hours ago, Tywin et al. said: Stop trying to win!!! you want the three seed so you can play that obvious cheater @Ramsay B. and his Giants. Don't fuck around and get the two seed!!! Go 9ers! Rhom 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywin et al. Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 (edited) 3 minutes ago, Ramsay B. said: Go 9ers! Fucking AJ Also, as dictator of Pick'em, I'm subtracting 100 points from your total score. Because!!! Edited January 8 by Tywin et al. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mexal Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 That was an incredibly costly and unnecessary game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramsay B. Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 1 minute ago, Tywin et al. said: Fucking AJ Inauspicious start Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywin et al. Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 1 minute ago, Ramsay B. said: Inauspicious start Idk why you'd want to face the Niners. Vikings and Giants fans are the ultimate Spiderman meme of frauds. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramsay B. Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 8 minutes ago, Tywin et al. said: Idk why you'd want to face the Niners. Vikings and Giants fans are the ultimate Spiderman meme of frauds. Huh? I don’t want to face SF. That’s why I want them to win this game. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywin et al. Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 11 minutes ago, Ramsay B. said: Huh? I don’t want to face SF. That’s why I want them to win this game. It would appear the Niners want you too! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramsay B. Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 If SF wins then Giants play Vikings. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywin et al. Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 1 hour ago, Ramsay B. said: If SF wins then Giants play Vikings. See you next week. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhom Posted January 8 Author Share Posted January 8 Texans are really bad at this tanking thing. So the Bears are in a great spot to dangle Bryce Young out there and get a ton of good picks. Looks like Niners are the two seed. Which is great… except it really makes you frustrated about the loss to the Bears… the Broncos… the Falcons…. Take care of business in any one of those and you are resting next week. Secretary of Eumenes 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywin et al. Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 @DMC, @Rhom What do you do with Lance now going forward? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMC Posted January 8 Share Posted January 8 Just now, Tywin et al. said: @DMC, @Rhom What do you do with Lance now going forward? Considering the recent injury history of Niner quarterbacks, I'm absolutely fine keeping both Purdy and Lance on the roster. Especially while they're still on rookie contracts. Rhom and Prince of the North 2 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywin et al. Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 4 minutes ago, DMC said: Considering the recent injury history of Niner quarterbacks, I'm absolutely fine keeping both Purdy and Lance on the roster. Especially while they're still on rookie contracts. Do you make him your starter next year? Because if not, that's one of the worst trades of all time. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rhom Posted January 9 Author Share Posted January 9 3 minutes ago, Tywin et al. said: Do you make him your starter next year? Because if not, that's one of the worst trades of all time. Unless Purdy wins the Super Bowl, I think you say it’s an open competition in camp (secretly weighted to Purdy). And yes, that makes for a terrible trade… but Purdy is on team record lists with Montana and Young and setting league records for rookie QBs. If that’s what he really is, then you go with it and pretend the trade was for him. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMC Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 4 minutes ago, Tywin et al. said: Do you make him your starter next year? Because if not, that's one of the worst trades of all time. I think Purdy has definitely earned the right to compete for the starting job in camp. After that it's up to Shanahan. Granted if Purdy leads to to a Super Bowl win, or even just to the Super Bowl, it will be hard not to start him. But that's a good problem to have. I really don't care how it looks in terms of the trade. Hell, all they gave up was draft capital and drafting Purdy in the 7th round significantly makes up for that. I doubt Shanahan or Lynch care either. All things considered, they had a pretty great draft this year without a first rounder (especially if you count Mason, who was undrafted but still a rookie). Rhom 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ramsay B. Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 Golladay’s first Giants td! Dude is clutch as hell! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
DMC Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 I mean, let's face it, if Garoppolo had led the Niners to the Super Bowl again - and especially if he led them to a win - there'd be immense pressure on the Niners to resign him rather than (just) roll with Lance too. This way they still have that security, but without having to pay Garoppolo what will probably be at least a $20 million cap hit next year. Win-win in my book. Rhom 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Secretary of Eumenes Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 56 minutes ago, Rhom said: Texans are really bad at this tanking thing. So the Bears are in a great spot to dangle Bryce Young out there and get a ton of good picks. Looks like Niners are the two seed. Which is great… except it really makes you frustrated about the loss to the Bears… the Broncos… the Falcons…. Take care of business in any one of those and you are resting next week. Dawg, that Colts-Texans game was beautiful. If you'd like to know what Tanking looks like, it's marginally talented (even for) replacement QBs just throwing deep on 2nd and 3rd down regardless of coverage to get picked off. Yo, the Texans are so good at it they won! Rhom 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tywin et al. Posted January 9 Share Posted January 9 (edited) 17 minutes ago, Rhom said: Unless Purdy wins the Super Bowl, I think you say it’s an open competition in camp (secretly weighted to Purdy). 16 minutes ago, DMC said: I think Purdy has definitely earned the right to compete for the starting job in camp. After that it's up to Shanahan. Granted if Purdy leads to to a Super Bowl win, or even just to the Super Bowl, it will be hard not to start him. But that's a good problem to have. Even if they lose their first playoff game, which is still TBD because the Seahawks are now in OT, don't you have to start him given this run? Lance has shown you nothing so far. Quote And yes, that makes for a terrible trade… but Purdy is on team record lists with Montana and Young and setting league records for rookie QBs. If that’s what he really is, then you go with it and pretend the trade was for him. I really don't care how it looks in terms of the trade. Hell, all they gave up was draft capital and drafting Purdy in the 7th round significantly makes up for that. I doubt Shanahan or Lynch care either. All things considered, they had a pretty great draft this year without a first rounder (especially if you count Mason, who was undrafted but still a rookie). Not sure you can be that dismissive. Three firsts for a QB that might never do anything for you? That's pretty tough, especially when, *lowers voice*, I tried to tell you almost any QB would be good on your team. Like even Zach Wilson or Sam Darnold. That's how QB friendly the system is. Also why I wouldn't trade for Jimmy, no matter how beautiful his smile is. Edited January 9 by Tywin et al. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts