Jump to content

US Politics: Sorry, we do make the rules.


LongRider

Recommended Posts

Santos’ story makes everyone look bad. Not sure if that’s what’ll keep him around, but it might help. Particularly when, again, the party it makes look the worst is the one containing a big chunk of people who want representative government to look as inept as possible. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, James Arryn said:

Santos’ story makes everyone look bad. Not sure if that’s what’ll keep him around, but it might help. Particularly when, again, the party it makes look the worst is the one containing a big chunk of people who want representative government to look as inept as possible. 

It's simple why They will; there would have to be a new election and it's unlikely the replacement will vote with Their craziness.  The winner might even be a Dem.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Wade1865 said:

So he fibbed a little -- no big deal. It’s part of the profession. He’s still a great American (or whatever).

Give him a chance /cdn-cgi/mirage/6dc3d3eb1a38505cabd90fb7ffd43995f14702a0df4cf40d6136ae67a48e140e/1280/https://asoiaf.westeros.org/uploads/emoticons/default_leer.gif

:shocked:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

51 minutes ago, Gaston de Foix said:

You have to grade him on a curve.  His grandparents fled the Holocaust.  

No no no, you got it all wrong. His grandparents died in the Holocaust. Nazi bastards actually ate the food that their victims s(laved)erved to them. Just ate it. Right off the plate! Whole steps, literal physical steps, in-between Order Up!ding! and "Your Bvratvurst, Herr Commandant." 

These fuckin fascists ain't too bright, is what I'm sayin. Curves indeed

 

 

 

ETA:

We call ^that^ "writing off the page"

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Boring procedural question: Can the House vote for anything (outside of its own operating rules?) that is not subject to a senate vote and presidential assent? Just thinking about the recent "defund the IRS" vote, which I believe seeks to reverse the 10-year IRS funding that I understand was part of the Inflation Reduction Act.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, The Anti-Targ said:

Boring procedural question: Can the House vote for anything (outside of its own operating rules?) that is not subject to a senate vote and presidential assent? Just thinking about the recent "defund the IRS" vote, which I believe seeks to reverse the 10-year IRS funding that I understand was part of the Inflation Reduction Act.

Subpoenas are the big one. The House can do all sorts of investigations (and "investigations") on its own.

Also impeachments. Yeah, you need the senate to convict. But if, say, DHS Sec. Mayorkas gets impeached (articles have already been introduced) it's a big hassle/distraction until the senate acquits.

And they can both file lawsuits and submit court briefs on their own. Last time Republicans had the House majority they made the House party to several Obamacare-related lawsuits.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, DanteGabriel said:

Look here, JA, no one has brought up Prince Harry in this thread... Yet.

 

Maybe not, but they will. It’s all about partisanship now, no one gives a shit about real values. If Santos had pretended to be a Democrat the way he pretended to be a Republican, all the people pretending to attack “him” would be pretending to defend “him”, and all the people pretending to defend “him” would be invading the capital. He didn’t pretend to do anything wrong, people should pretend to leave him alone. Remember what they (allegedly) said about throwing imaginary bricks through fake glass houses.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Fez said:

Subpoenas are the big one. The House can do all sorts of investigations (and "investigations") on its own.

Also impeachments. Yeah, you need the senate to convict. But if, say, DHS Sec. Mayorkas gets impeached (articles have already been introduced) it's a big hassle/distraction until the senate acquits.

And they can both file lawsuits and submit court briefs on their own. Last time Republicans had the House majority they made the House party to several Obamacare-related lawsuits.

Thanks. So their big defund the IRS show was just blowing smoke.

I guess the problem with the House knowing they can't get any legislation through the senate and POTUS without bipartisan support means they have nothing meaningful to do until 2024 except investigations, impeachments, lawsuits and budget brinkmanship.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, James Arryn said:

Maybe not, but they will. It’s all about partisanship now, no one gives a shit about real values. If Santos had pretended to be a Democrat the way he pretended to be a Republican, all the people pretending to attack “him” would be pretending to defend “him”, and all the people pretending to defend “him” would be invading the capital. He didn’t pretend to do anything wrong, people should pretend to leave him alone. Remember what they (allegedly) said about throwing imaginary bricks through fake glass houses.

What is this intoxicating clarity?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, James Arryn said:

Can’t believe the man who single-handedly ended the Holocaust is getting shit on so much in this thread. 

Let's not forget, his mother died twice!  Have you no respect for motherless grifters?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...