Jump to content

Spare a Moment for H&M, Part 3


Tywin et al.

Recommended Posts

18 minutes ago, Fragile Bird said:

It’s dismissed “without prejudice” which means she can try suing again. The judge states she can try one more time to get relief. I wonder if she’ll try.

The claims regarding the Oprah interview were “without prejudice”, the claims about the Scobie book were “with prejudice”. (I think). There was a lot going on there.

the claims about the Oprah interview were a particular sticking point at the last hearing because Scammy’s filing “paraphrased” segments of the interview and didn’t include the actual words spoken or a transcript. That point ion of the complaint was heavily revised and some portions removed. That’s some crack legal talent she’s hired right there.

She will probably re-file. Assuming this whole thing has always been about generating tabloid fodder. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...

It's true they would be slammed no matter whether he/she/they went or didn't go.  It doesn't help that the will they/won't they was long and drawn out, with H even missing the RSVP window. 

I don't know if it's really surprising that a couple who have trashed the royal family and the British media would be....treated harshly by the royal family and the British media.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, Wall Flower said:

Yes, the same media shills that were outraged by the thought of Meghan attending are now outraged by her not attending.

At least we can all rest easy that poor "the hardest thing I've ever done" Kate will be spared further trauma.

They should have blatantly just asked the mail etc do you think we should come or not come and pinned them to a decision before they made it? So they couldn't be cunts regardless of what they decided. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Cas Stark said:

Hmmm, just judging by the headlines in that link, most of those articles are critical of Harry, not Meghan.....but of course that doesn't fit the narrative.

I guess you'd be the authority on this because you probably read every single one of them.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Cas Stark said:

Is it supposed to be some kind of penetrating insight that Meg and Harry after a 2+ year campaign against the monarchy, were going to be criticized no matter whether they did or did not go to the coronation?  

 

It’s like you could just repeat the mantra ‘what did you expect to happen??’ to Meghan at every single stage since she met Harry. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Cas Stark said:

Is it supposed to be some kind of penetrating insight that Meg and Harry after a 2+ year campaign against the monarchy, were going to be criticized no matter whether they did or did not go to the coronation?  

 

Is it supposed to be some kind of penetrating insight that just because these people meet the horrible expectations of being ridiculously hypocritical and hateful media we're not supposed to criticize them for doing so?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, DMC said:

Is it supposed to be some kind of penetrating insight that just because these people meet the horrible expectations of being ridiculously hypocritical and hateful media we're not supposed to criticize them for doing so?

I'd say, "surpassed expectations", a long time ago. Like the slick asshole on a recent panel discussion who joked about hanging  Archie over the balcony like Michael Jackson. And the similarly pasty ghouls who chuckled at the notion. Congratufuckinglations, you're a grown man scoring points off a 3 year old boy. I wouldn't shed a tear if they all got cancer of the eyes. 

And I'll say again, this is not some vague environmental phenomenon. There are maybe a handful of organization and a dozen public personas who have made a professional sport out of going after this family. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Deadlines? What Deadlines? said:

Like the slick asshole on a recent panel discussion who joked about hanging  Archie over the balcony like Michael Jackson.

Only thing that surprises me about this is they didn't say Lilibet.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/15/2023 at 8:52 AM, Heartofice said:

It’s like you could just repeat the mantra ‘what did you expect to happen??’ to Meghan at every single stage since she met Harry. 

Okay first you praised Chris rock for saying Megan should have know the royal family would be massively racist.
Now you’re praising someone for saying she should have known the level of hypocrisy of the British tabloids.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 2 weeks later...
On 4/27/2023 at 12:38 PM, Deadlines? What Deadlines? said:

Yeah he is.

 

Hmm you know if Megan had been the one to make the public statement Morgen would have attacked her directly.

Come to think of it through out most of these threads in terms of recent comments coming from the couple it’s generally been Harry despite the never ending insinuation of her talking over her husband.

Also today I just learned Archie’s birthday is on the day of the coronation.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Archived

This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...