Tywin et al. Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 1 hour ago, BigFatCoward said: I've got no problem with this. If it meant he could get back to work and not quarantine. Agreed. Like it or not you need to prioritize a high ranking member of government, especially if there was a chance he too could be infected and may have already possibly spread it while not experiencing any symptoms. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mormont Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 1 hour ago, BigFatCoward said: I've got no problem with this. If it meant he could get back to work and not quarantine. Yeah, but there's an assumption there that Jacob Rees-Mogg being at work was a net positive for the country. Lord of Oop North and Derfel Cadarn 1 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derfel Cadarn Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 (edited) 2 hours ago, BigFatCoward said: I've got no problem with this. If it meant he could get back to work and not quarantine. This prick on the other hand https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-64814421 He could work from home? edit: and he junped the queue over people doing actual frontline jobs, like medical staff who can’t work from home Edited March 2 by Derfel Cadarn Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derfel Cadarn Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 More texts! Hancock and Facin Williamson slagging off teachers and their union Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigFatCoward Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 47 minutes ago, mormont said: Yeah, but there's an assumption there that Jacob Rees-Mogg being at work was a net positive for the country. Well quite. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Which Tyler Posted March 2 Author Share Posted March 2 40 minutes ago, Derfel Cadarn said: More texts! Hancock and Facin Williamson slagging off teachers and their union Comes with another reminder of "don't read the comments section!" Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spockydog Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 State of this lying cunt spreading another pack of lies. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heartofice Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 McDonald’s is probably the cheapest way to get a dinner for a family of 4. It’s insane how cheap a maccy d’s is Which Tyler 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Which Tyler Posted March 2 Author Share Posted March 2 (edited) Laughable that Kemi thinks she's center-right, that was Cameron's coalition government were mile from that now. 1 minute ago, Heartofice said: McDonald’s is probably the cheapest way to get a dinner for a family of 4. It’s insane how cheap a maccy d’s is Can't disagree with that. Calories per £, McD's has got to be at, or close to, the cheapest option - and that was before the currently costs of turning an oven on. Edited March 2 by Which Tyler Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spockydog Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 13 minutes ago, Which Tyler said: Laughable that Kemi thinks she's center-right, that was Cameron's coalition government were mile from that now. Where the fuck do they find all these awful people? ants 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heartofice Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 2 minutes ago, Spockydog said: Where the fuck do they find all these awful people? Not sure what she has said that is so awful, unless you have purple hair. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zorral Posted March 2 Share Posted March 2 1 hour ago, Spockydog said: Where the fuck do they find all these awful people? They breed 'em. Eugenic policies in action! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
BigFatCoward Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 Anderson is the absolute worst. https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-politics-64823712 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spockydog Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 Lol. Back to your constituents, you fucking wobble-headed cunt. Also, could Starmer not have waited a few weeks before appointing Sue Gray? The dumb fuck. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spockydog Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 "Misled the house on several ocassions." Bye bye, Bozo. You're never coming back. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spockydog Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 We all know it's bollocks. Well, those of us who actually use our eyes, ears, and brains will know it's bollocks. But as we all know, there are millions of gullible fucking morons in this country who will fall for any old shite smeared across the front pages of the Mail and the Telegraph. Enormous error of judgement from Sir Keeer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
mormont Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 (edited) Starmer has made mistakes, but this won't even register. He won't lose a single percentage point in the polls for appointing Sue Gray at this time or any other. Edited March 3 by mormont ants 1 Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Spockydog Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 (edited) 22 minutes ago, mormont said: Starmer has made mistakes, but this won't even register. He won't lose a single percentage point in the polls for appointing Sue Gray at this time or any other. How can you say that? There will definitely be people who suck up the JRM Kool-aid. And Labour's lead in the polls is already shrinking by the day. Starmer's team were briefing that appointing Gray was another sign that Labour are 'preparing for Government.' But why oh why did he insist on doing this at *precisely* the moment the Privileges Committee reports for the first time? Why not wait a while? Why give the likes of JRM and Hartley-Brewer and all the rest of them any ammunition? It's fucking bizarre. Edited March 3 by Spockydog Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Heartofice Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 Yeah I don't think it hurts Starmer at all. The optics on it are bad but they don't affect him especially. It might help Boris as it just gives off the air of a stitch up and gives him a way back in. I do think it's an odd choice by Starmer. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Derfel Cadarn Posted March 3 Share Posted March 3 Johnson whatsapping Hancock: “We’ll need to get heavy with the police to better enforce lockdown breaches.” Hancock: “yeah.” Johnson: “We’ll discuss it at tonight’s leaving party.” Hancock: “can’t make that. Working late with my PA.” Johnson: “You can make my birthday party yes?” Hancock: “yeah, see you there!” Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts