House Connington Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 Uh, I said Prester was evil first? Here's a cookie. Upcliff made a strong (strong-ish, it's day 1) statement about the chances of either me or Sars being evil based on (a small amount) of actual gameplay. You being the first to call me evil after my first post does not make you a leader. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dayne Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 You were only first because you happened to type faster because we crossposted. Bah. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dondarrion Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 Here's a cookie. Upcliff made a strong (strong-ish, it's day 1) statement about the chances of either me or Sars being evil based on (a smal amount) of actual gameplay. You being the first to call me evil after my first post does not make you a leader. Did I say I was the leader? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dondarrion Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 You were only first because you happened to type faster because we crossposted. Bah. You might want to grab Mavis Beacon. It works wonders. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dayne Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 I was the leader Right there! Mavis Beacon?? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dondarrion Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 Right there! Mavis Beacon?? Teaches you how to type Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Stokeworth Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 Let me say sorry to Prester Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Connington Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 Uller - your defense to Sars calling you sympish was that you voted me first and therefore weren't following Uller. Kind of implied that you took the lead on voting me because you actually believed I was evil. When you placed the vote on me, it was in a joking tone (as was my post) and if your suspicions on me have solidified, you've not taken the time to explain. Just "Yep. Nope. I agree" type posts. So yeah, as it stands, you look like a follower. A dirty sympish follower Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Sunglass Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 Let me say sorry to Prester Anything to add to that? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Connington Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 Oakheart, baby - you're killing me here! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Gaga Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 It would be nice if people would start listing reasons why they're voting the way they are. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dondarrion Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 Uller - your defense to Sars calling you sympish was that you voted me first and therefore weren't following Uller. Kind of implied that you took the lead on voting me because you actually believed I was evil. When you placed the vote on me, it was in a joking tone (as was my post) and if your suspicions on me have solidified, you've not taken the time to explain. Just "Yep. Nope. I agree" type posts. So yeah, as it stands, you look like a follower. A dirty sympish follower I was serious actually. I remember last game where a player was innocent and was ignored for the rest of the game because of stupid crap like your first post. People always go "oh a killer wouldn't say something like that" so one day a killer will and I think you are it. I didn't know it wasn't obvious why I was voting you? There is also a difference between "being a leader" and "voting first." One implies that I'm trying to get others to follow me, the other implies that I was the first to vote. If someone calls me a symp for following another player, you would expect me to have followed the other player. Since I voted first, I wasn't following therefore the symp claim follows no logic that I understand. So then we're stuck with why Sarsfield would attempt to discredit me and that's because Upcliff hit a nerve. It follows logical reasoning. Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Magic Mirror Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 Ok so we have Prester and Sarfield as sypm / counter symp. Yeah right, Personally I think they are just having early day 1 fun. But pressure is good. However I do not understand why Norcross see's this as a reason to vote for night. We won't catch the killers my avoiding lynches especially without no real discussion. Its far too early for the odd even rule to be considered, also I think 2 evil teams affect it. Ambrose I think voted night as a joke, going by the tone of his post but I was waiting for him to place it elsewhere Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Clegane Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 (welcomes self to game) Welcome to the game Lefford! Oakheart, baby - you're killing me here! why do you call oakheart your baby, do you feel special feelings toward him? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dayne Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 I'm not quite ready to be lynching anyone at this moment, so I'll remove vote. The joke has gone far enough. By the way, someone is posting visible. Be careful! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lady Gaga Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 I was serious actually. I remember last game where a player was innocent and was ignored for the rest of the game because of stupid crap like your first post. People always go "oh a killer wouldn't say something like that" so one day a killer will and I think you are it. I didn't know it wasn't obvious why I was voting you? There is also a difference between "being a leader" and "voting first." One implies that I'm trying to get others to follow me, the other implies that I was the first to vote. If someone calls me a symp for following another player, you would expect me to have followed the other player. Since I voted first, I wasn't following therefore the symp claim follows no logic that I understand. So then we're stuck with why Sarsfield would attempt to discredit me and that's because Upcliff hit a nerve. It follows logical reasoning. My symp comment was based on the lack of detail in your posts. I didn't realize you were the 'first' to place a vote on Prestor, but looking at it it just adds more weight to my argument. I mean, you provide us with an explanation for your vote now that you're pressed, but why not when you actually cast it? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Westerling Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 It would be nice if people would start listing reasons why they're voting the way they are. It would also be nice if the killers would just confess and we make this a short game. But Sarsfield, since you have been amusing so far, I give you a hint: SPOILER: look here, SarsfieldThey have no reason, dude! Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Dondarrion Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 My symp comment was based on the lack of detail in your posts. I didn't realize you were the 'first' to place a vote on Prestor, but looking at it it just adds more weight to my argument. I mean, you provide us with an explanation for your vote now that you're pressed, but why not when you actually cast it? Because it was obvious? He came out and proclaimed himself evil. I voted him and said he was evil. 2 + 2 = 4. Next time I'll hold a big neon sign over my head? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Frey Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 Oh. I thought there's no actual point of lynching someone the first day as we have no info. I thought the probability of lynching a Lannister on the day 1 is way too high, so why should we do that? But if that's really true and we really have to lynch someone in order to get rid of killers, I think I'll just have to reconsider my vote. Whom am I supposed to choose then? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
House Westerling Posted February 11, 2008 Share Posted February 11, 2008 Because it was obvious? He came out and proclaimed himself evil. I voted him and said he was evil. 2 + 2 = 4. Next time I'll hold a big neon sign over my head? So you really really believe that Prester has three masters? Link to comment Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Archived
This topic is now archived and is closed to further replies.